Liveable cities and urban underground space

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2016, Pages 8-20

  Hunt, D V L ^a   Makana, L O ^a   Jefferson, I ^a   Rogers, C D F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cities; Planning; Underground space

Indexed keywords

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING; PLANNING; TUNNELS;

CARBON REDUCTION; CITIES; RADICAL TRANSFORMATION; UNDERGROUND SPACE; URBAN CITIES; URBAN UNDERGROUND SPACES; WELLBEING;

CARBON;

MAPPING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

EID: 84949843689     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Admiraal J. A bottom-up approach to the planning of underground space. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2006, 21(3):464-465.
2. Admiraal, J., 2010. Planning the use of underground space: asset or liability. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of ITA World Tunnelling Congress, Vancouver, CD Rom.
3. Angel S., Sheppard S., Civco D.L., Buckley R., Chabaeva A., Gitlin L., Perlin M. The Dynamics of Global Urban Expansion 2005, Citeseer.
4. Baiden G., Bissiri Y., Luoma S., Henrich G. Mapping utility infrastructure via underground GPS positioning with autonomous telerobotics. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 39:6-14.
5. Bélanger P. Underground landscape: the urbanism and infrastructure of Toronto's downtown pedestrian network. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2007, 22(3):272-292.
6. Besner, J. (2002). The sustainable usage of the underground space in metropolitan area. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of ACUUS, Torino.
7. Bobylev N. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city's master plan: a case of urban underground space use. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(4):1128-1137.
8. Bobylev N. Underground space as an urban indicator: measuring use of subsurface. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55:40-51.
9. Boivin D.J. Montreal's underground network: a study of the downtown pedestrian system. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1991, 6(1):83-91.
10. Braithwaite P. Improving company performance through sustainability assessment. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2007, 160(2):95-103.
11. Brown K., Westaway E. Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2011, 36:321-342.
12. Brundtland G.H. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" 1987, United Nations.
13. Carmody J., Sterling R.L. Underground Space Design: Part 1: Overview of Subsurface Space Utilization Part 2: Design for People in Underground Facilities 1993, University of Texas Press.
14. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. Human factors engineering in utility tunnel design. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2001, 16(3):211-215.
15. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. Risks and potential hazards in utility tunnels for urban areas. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 2003, 156(1):51-56.
16. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. An analysis of utility tunnel viability in urban areas. Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 2006, 23(1):11-19.
17. Canto-Perello J., Curiel-Esparza J. Assessing governance issues of urban utility tunnels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2013, 33:82-87.
18. Carpenter S.R., Folke C. Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21(6):309-315.
19. Chow, F., Paul, T., Vahaaho, I., Sellberg, B., & Lemos, L. (2002). Hidden aspects of urban planning: utilisation of underground space. In: Paper Presented at the Proc. 2nd Int. Conference on Soil Structure Interaction in Urban Civil Engineering.
20. Duffaut, P., 1977. Site reservation policies for large underground openings. In: Subsurface Space: Rockstore, vol. 77, pp. 10.
21. Duffaut P., Labbé M. Contribution du sous-sol à la vie urbaine, exemple du Val-de-Marne. Tunnels et ouvrages souterrains 2008, (209):383-389.
22. Evans D., Stephenson M., Shaw R. The present and future use of 'land' below ground. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:S302-S316.
23. Fairhurst C. Going Under to Stay on Top 1976, Pergamon Press, New York.
24. Fiksel J. Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustain.: Sci. Pract. Policy 2006, 2(2):14-21.
25. Folke C., Carpenter S.R., Walker B., Scheffer M., Chapin T., Rockström J. Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(4):20.
26. Godard J.P., Sterling R.L. General considerations in assessing the advantages of using underground space. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1995, 10(3):287-297.
27. Godard, J.P., 2004. Urban underground space and benefits of going underground. In: Paper Presented at the World Tunnel Congress.
28. Hanamura, T., 1998. Underground space creation and utilization for a high quality city. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of 3rd International Congress on Construction, Singapore.
29. Hanamura, T., 2002. Underground space development for subway and sewage as a key solution to the urban congestion problems. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Innovation and Sustainable Development of Civil Engineering in the 21st Century, Beijing.
30. Hénard E. Études sur les transformations de Paris de Paris et autres écrits sur l'urbanisme 1903, Librairies-Imprimeries Réunis, Paris.
31. Hinze C., Sobisch H., Voss H. Spatial modelling in geology and its practical use. Math. Geol. 1999, 4:51-60.
32. Hopwood B., Mellor M., O'Brien G. Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain. Devel. 2005, 13(1):38-52.
33. Horvat E., Edelenbos J., Monnikhof R., Haasnoot J., Van Der Hoeven F., Van Der Krogt R. Strategic study on the utilization of underground space in the Netherlands. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1998, 13(2):159-165.
34. Hunt D.V.L., Rogers C.D. Barriers to sustainable infrastructure in urban regeneration. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2005, 158(2):67-81.
35. Hunt D.V.L., Lombardi D.R., Rogers C.D.F., Jefferson I. Application of sustainability indicators in decision-making processes for urban regeneration projects. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2008, 161(1):77-91.
36. Hunt D.V.L., Jefferson I., Gaterell M.R., Rogers C.D.F. Planning for sustainable utility infrastructure. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plann. 2009, 162(4):187-201.
37. Hunt D.V.L., Jefferson I., Rogers C. Assessing the sustainability of underground space usage-A toolkit for testing possible urban futures. J. Mt. Sci. 2011, 8(2):211-222.
38. Hunt D.V.L., Nash D., Rogers C.D.F. Sustainable utility placement via multi-utility tunnels. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 39:15-26.
39. ITA Examples of benefits of underground urban public transportation systems, ITA working group on costs-benefits of underground urban public transportation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1987, 2(1):5-54.
40. ITA Legal and administrative issues in underground space use: a preliminary survey of ITA member nations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1991, 6(2):191-209.
41. ITA Policy statement on legal and administrative issues in underground space use, ITA working group on subsurface planning. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1991, 6(4):471.
42. ITA Report on the damaging effects of water on tunnels during their working life, ITA working group on maintenance and repair of underground structures. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1991, 6(1):11-76.
43. ITA Planning and mapping of underground space: an overview. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2000, 15(3):271-286. Working Group 4.
44. ITA, 2002. Why go underground? In: I.T. Association (Ed.), Lausanne, Switzerland.
45. Jacobs, R., 2010. Retrofit Heat Pumps for Buildings. Final Report.
46. Jefferson, I., Rogers, C., Hunt, D. (2006). Achieving sustainable underground construction in Birmingham Eastside. In: Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG), Nottingham, UK.
47. Kates R.W., Travis W.R., Wilbanks T.J. Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109(19):7156-7161.
48. Kessler H., Mathers S., Sobisch H.-G. The capture and dissemination of integrated 3D geospatial knowledge at the British Geological Survey using GSI3D software and methodology. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35(6):1311-1321.
49. Kessler, H., Turner, A., Culshaw, M., Royse, K., 2008. Unlocking the potential of digital 3D geological subsurface models for geotechnical engineers.
50. Leach M., Scoones I., Stirling A. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice 2010, Earthscan.
51. Li, X., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Bao, W., 2009. Some thoughts concerning development and utilization of urban underground space in China. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of 12th International Conference of Associated Research Centers for Urban Underground Space (ACUUS), Shenzhen, China.
52. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Lubchenco J. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317(5844):1513-1516.
53. Lombardi D.R., Leach J.M., Rogers C.D., Aston R., Barber A., Boyko C., Caputo S. Designing Resilient Cities: A Guide to Good Practice 2012, IHS BRE Press.
54. Makana, L.O., Jefferson, I., Hunt, D.V.L., 2016. Assessment of the future resilience of urban sub-surface environments. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. XX(X), XXX-XXX.
55. Matsumoto, R., 2005. Deep underground utilization law and its benefits. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress, Istanbul.
56. Metje N., Atkins P., Brennan M., Chapman D., Lim H., Machell J., Redfern M. Mapping the underworld-state-of-the-art review. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2007, 22(5):568-586.
57. Monnikhof R., Edelenbos J., Van der Krogt R. How to determine the necessity for using underground space: an integral assessment method for strategic decision-making. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech. 1998, 13(2):167-172.
58. Narvi S., Vihavainen U., Korpi J., Havukainen J. Legal, administrative and planning issues for subsurface development in Helsinki. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1994, 9(3):379-384.
59. National-Research-Council Geological and Geotechnical Engineering in the New Millennium: Opportunities for Research and Technological Innovation 2006, National Academies Press.
60. National Research Council, C.o.U.E., 2013. Underground Engineering for Sustainable Urban Development. National Academy of Sciences.
61. Nelson D.R., Adger W.N., Brown K. Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2007, 32(1):395.
62. O'Sullivan A. Urban Economics 2012, MCGRAW-HILL Higher Education.
63. Parker H.W., Daly W. Underground technology: a new direction in development. Nat. Devel. 1981, 40:49.
64. Parker, H.W., 2004. Underground space: good for sustainable development, and vice versa. In: Paper Presented at the International Tunnelling Association (ITA) Open Session, World Tunnel Congress, Singapore.
65. Parker, H.W., 2008b. Security of tunnels and underground space: challenges and opportunities. In: SP RAPPORT (2008: 11).
66. Parriaux, A., Tacher, L., Kaufmann, V., Blunier, P., 2006. Underground resources and sustainable development in urban areas.
67. Parriaux, A., Blunier, P., Maire, P., Tacher, L., 2007. The DEEP CITY project: a global concept for a sustainable urban underground management. In: Paper Presented at the 11th ACUUS International Conference, Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers.
68. Price S.J., Burke H.F., Terrington R.L., Reeves H., Boon D., Scheib A.J. The 3D characterisation of the zone of human interaction and the sustainable use of underground space in urban and peri-urban environments: case studies from the UK. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 2010, 161(2):219-235.
69. Raskin P., Monks F. Global scenarios in historical perspective. Ecosyst. Hum. Well-Being 2005, 35.
70. Redman C.L. Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19(2):37.
71. Rieker K. Construction of a combined stormwater management and road tunnel in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2006, 21(3-4):360.
72. Rinaldi S.M., Peerenboom J.P., Kelly T.K. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. Control Syst., IEEE 2001, 21(6):11-25.
73. Rochat, D., Erkman, S., Chambaz, D., 2006. Le recyclage des matériaux de construction à Genève. Service cantonal de gestion des déchets, Genève.
74. Rogers C.D.F. Substructures, underground space and sustainable urban environments. Geol. Soc., London, Eng. Geol. Spec. Publ. 2009, 22(1):177-188.
75. Rogers C.D.F., Bouch C.J., Williams S., Barber A.R.G., Baker C.J., Bryson J.R., Chapman D.N., Chapman L., Coaffee J., Jefferson I., Quinn A.D. Resistance and resilience - paradigms for critical local infrastructure. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 2012, 165(2):73-84.
76. Rogers, C.D.F., Hunt, D.V.L., 2006. Sustainable utility infrastructure via multi-utility tunnels. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering 2006 Conference, Towards a Sustainable Future, Calgary.
77. Rogers C.D.F., Lombardi D.R., Leach J.M., Cooper R.F.D. The urban futures methodology applied to urban regeneration. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2012, 165(1):5-20.
78. Rosenbaum M. Characterisation of the shallow subsurface: implications for urban infrastructure and environmental assessment. New Paradigms in Subsurface Prediction 2003, 3-6. Springer.
79. Shah J., Jefferson I., Hunt D.V.L. Resilience assessment for geotechnical infrastructure assets. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Asset Manage. 2014, 1(4):95-104.
80. Simpson B., Tatsuoka F. Geotechnics: the next 60 years. Geotechnique 2008, 58(5):357-368.
81. Sobisch H.-G., Bombien H. 11 Regional subsurface models and their practical usage. Subsurface Cond. 2003, 99:129.
82. Sterling R.L., Admiraal H., Bobylev N., Parker H., Godard J.-P., Vähäaho I., Hanamura T. Sustainability issues for underground space in urban areas. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plann. 2012, 165(4):241-254.
83. Sterling R.L., Nelson S.R., Jaffe M. Planning for Underground Space 1983, American Planning Association.
84. Sterling, R.L., Anspach, J.H., Allouche, E.N., Simicevic, J., Rogers, C.D., Weston, K.E., Hayes, K., 2009. Encouraging innovation in locating and characterizing underground utilities.
85. Sterling R., Nelson P. City resiliency and underground space use. Adv. Undergr. Space Devel. 2013.
86. Sterling R.L. Urban underground space use planning: a growing dilemma. Urban Plann. Int. 2007, 6:004.
87. Singapore-Government, 2010. The Economic Strategies Committee (ESC) Key recommendations February 2010. Singapore: Retrieved from http://www.esc.gov.sg/recommendation.html.
88. Subspace A. A mined underground space master plan for Minneapolis, Minnesota-Part I. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 1990, 5(3):233-243.
89. Thapa S. Understanding Peri-Urban Sustainability: The Role of the Resilience Approach 2010, STEPS Centre.
90. United-Nations, 2010. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2009 Revision: UN.
91. Utudjian E. L'urbanisme souterrain 1952, Presses universitaires de France.
92. Utudjian E., Bernet D. Architecture et urbanisme souterrains 1966, vol. 4. R. Laffont, 1966.
93. Vähäaho I. Underground Master Plan of Helsinki: a city growing inside bedrock. City of Helsinki 2009.
94. Vitt J.E., Kjelshus B. Developing Kansas City's underground space. Undergr. Space 1980, 4(5). (United States).
95. Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S.R., Kinzig A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2004, 9(2):5.
96. Walker B., Gunderson L., Kinzig A., Folke C., Carpenter S., Schultz L. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):13.
97. Walker B., Salt D. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World 2006, Island Press.
98. Wiek A., Withycombe L., Redman C.L. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain. Sci. 2011, 6(2):203-218.
99. Zektser I.S., Lorne E. Groundwater Resources of the World: And their Use. IhP Series on Groundwater 2004, Unesco.