Assessing the sustainability of underground space usage - A toolkit for testing possible Urban Futures

Journal of Mountain Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 211-222

  Hunt, D V L ^a   Jefferson, I ^a   Rogers, C D F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

sustainability; toolkit; underground space; urban futures

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953290466     PISSN: 16726316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-011-2093-8     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Berkhout F, M Eames and J Skea (1998) Environmental Futures Scoping Study: Final Report. SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research). Brighton, UK.
2. Berr (2007) Energy Market Outlook. Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. Ofgem. p 121.
3. Blakely EJ and MG Snyder (1998) Separate places: Crime and security in gated communities. In: M. Felson and R. B. Peiser eds.), Reducing crime through real estate development and management, Washington, D. C.: Urban Land Institute, pp 53-70.
4. Christozov D (1997) Montreal underground: a case for indoor city planning. Conference of the Associated research Centers for Urban Underground Space, Montreal.
5. Cosgrove W, Rijsberman F (2000) World Water Vision: making water everybody's business. London: Earthscan.
6. Costanza R (2003) A vision for the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature. Futures 35: 651-671.
7. Defra (2002) Sewage Treatment in the UK: UK Implementation of the EC Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive. Dept. for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs. p 20.
8. Defra (2008a) Future Water: The Government's water strategy for England. Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs, p 98.
9. Defra (2008b) Municipal Waste Management Statistics. Department for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs. p 2.
10. Dempsey N (2009) Briefing: UK-India research network. Proceedings - Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning.
11. DTI (2002) Futures 2020: Revised Scenarios and Guidance. Department of Trade and Industry. p 36.
12. DFT (2008) Regulations for Part 3 of the Traffic Management Act 2004: Permit Schemes (England) Regulations 200[7] [retrieved on January 5th 2011 from www. dft. gov. uk/consultations/aboutia/ria/pddraftregria. pdf-2008-12-19].
13. EA (2006) Environment Agency Scenarios 2030. Environment Agency: Bristol.
14. EA (2009) Water for people and the environment. Environment Agency: Bristol. p 92.
15. Galil NI and Yaacov L (2001) Analysis of sludge management parameters resulting from the use of domestic garbage disposers. Water Science and Technology, 44(10): 27-34.
16. Gallopin G, Hammond AL, Raskin P and Swart R (1997) Branch Points: Global Scenarios and Human Choice. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm. p 55.
17. Golany G (1989) Urban underground space design in China. University of Delaware Press, Newark. p 160.
18. Hammond A (1998) Which World? Scenarios for the 21st Century, p 293.
19. Hall L (2004), Underground Buildings: More than Meets the Eye, Quill Driver Books, World Dancer Press, inc., Sanger, California. p 215.
20. Hunt DVL, Jefferson I and Rogers CDF (2009). Geotechnics the next 60 years. Discussion Article. Geotechnique, 59(8): 723-724.
21. ICE (2009) The State of the Nation: Defending Critical Infrastructure. Institution of Civil Engineers, London. p 16.
22. IPCC (2000) Emissions scenarios: summary for policy makers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp 3-12.
23. Kahn H and AJ Wiener (1967) The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-three Years. Macmillan publishers, New York.
24. Kaplan RD (1994) The coming anarchy. The Atlantic Monthly, 273(2): 44-76.
25. Karlberg T and Erik N (1999) Food Waste Disposers - Effects on Wastewater Treatment Plants. A Study from the Town of Surahammar. VA-FORSK REPORT.
26. Makropoulos C, Memon FA, Shirley-Smith C et al (2008) Futures: an exploration of scenarios for sustainable urban water management. Water Policy 10(4): 345-373.
27. Marvin S and Slater S (1997) Urban infrastructure: the contemporary conflict between roads and utilities. Progress in Planning 48: 247-318.
28. NJUG (2003) Utilities guidelines on positioning and colour coding of apparatus. National Joint Utilities Group, London, UK.
29. OECD (2001) OECD Environmental Outlook. OECD, Paris. p 309.
30. OECD (2008) OECD Environmental outlook to 2030. Environment & Sustainable Development 2008 2008(1): 523.
31. Ofwat (2009) Service and delivery - performance of the water companies in England and Wales 2008-09. The Water Services Regulation Authority, Birmingham. p 50.
32. Parker HW (2004) Underground space: good for sustainable development, and vice versa. International Tunnelling Association (ITA) Open Session: World Tunnel Congress, Singapore. May, 2004. p 17.
33. th.
34. Raskin P, Gallopi{dotless}n G, Gutman P, et al (1998) Bending the Curve: Toward Global Sustainability. Stockholm Environment Institute.
35. Raskin P (2005) Global scenarios and the millennium ecosystem assessment: an historic overview. Ecosystems 8: 133-142.
36. th 2011 from http://www. gsg. org].
37. Ratcliffe JS and Sirr L (2004) Futures thinking for the built and human environment - The Prospective Process Through Scenario Thinking for the Built and Human Environment: a tool for exploring urban futures. The Futures Academy. Dublin Institute of Technology. p 14.
38. Ravetz J (2000) City Region 2020: Integrating planning for sustainable environment. Earthscan, London 2000, p 307.
39. rd 2006, Paper CT-001.
40. Sellberg B (1996) Environmental benefits: a Key to increased underground space use in urban planning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 11(4): 369-371.
41. Sterling RL (2000) Planning for cost effective underground space use in urban areas. In: Zhao, Shirlaw and Krishnan (eds), Tunnels and Underground Structures. pp 51-59.
42. Sterling R and Carmody J (1993) Underground Space Design: A Guide to Subsurface Utilization and Design for People in Underground Spaces. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. p 328.
43. UNEP (2002) Global Environment Outlook 3: Past present and future perspectives. United Nations Environment Programme. p 410.
44. UNEP (2007) Global Environment Outlook 4: Environment for Development. United Nations Environment Programme. p 572.
45. van Asselt MBA, De Niet R, Peters SSM, et al (1998) Towards Visions for a Sustainable Europe: An overview and assessment of the last decade of European scenario-studies. 1998, ICIS: Maastricht. p 96.
46. Von Meijenfeldt, Ernst (2003) Below Ground Level, Creating New Spaces for Contemporary Architecture, Birkhauser Publisher for Architecture, Basel. p 264.
47. Walton JS, El-Haram M, Castillo NH et al. (2005). Integrated assessment of urban sustainability. Engineering Sustainability 158(2): 57-65.
48. Water UK (2009) Water Facts: Water Resources [retrieved on January 5th 2011 from http://www. water. org. UK/home/resources-and-links/waterfacts/resources].
49. WBCSD (1997) Exploring Sustainable Development. Summary Brochure. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Geneva.
50. Yoo C, Kim SB, Shin HC and Baek SC (2005) Effect of tunnelling and groundwater interaction on ground and lining responses. Underground space use: Analysis of the past and lessons for the future. Erdem and Sollak (eds). pp 217-223.