Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city's Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use

Land Use Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1128-1137

  Bobylev, Nikolai ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Land Use Planning; Master plan; Urban sustainability; Urban Underground Infrastructure; Urban Underground Space

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; SPACE USE; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 64049109881     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Admiraal, J.B.M., 2006. A bottom-up approach to the planning of underground space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Volume 21, Issues 3-4, May-July 2006, pp. 464-465. Safety in the Underground Space - Proceedings of the ITA-AITES 2006 World Tunnel Congress and 32nd ITA General Assembly.
2. Bobylev N. Environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure. In: Pan T., and Meguro K. (Eds). "New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia," Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium. 18-19 October 2005, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (2005) 499-508
3. Bobylev N. Report on Environmental Assessment of Urban Underground Infrastructure (2006), University of Tokyo, United Nations University
4. Bobylev, Nikolai 2006b, Strategic environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure development policies. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Volume 21, Issues 3-4, May-July 2006. Safety in the Underground Space - Proceedings of the ITA-AITES 2006 World Tunnel Congress and 32nd ITA General Assembly. Elsevier. ISSN: 0886-7798, pp. 469-479.
5. Bobylev N. Sustainability and vulnerability analysis of critical underground infrastructure (pp. 445-469). In: Linkov I., Wenning R., and Kiker G. (Eds). Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks. NATO Security through Science Series (2007), Springer, Netherlands 10.1007/978-1-4020-6385-5_26
6. Bobylev, Nikolai 2008, Urbanization and environmental security: infrastructure development, environmental indicators, and sustainability. In: Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Environmental Change and Human Security: Recognizing and Acting on Hazard Impacts, June 2-10, 2007 Newport, Rhode Island, USA. NATO Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences, Springer, pp. 203-216.
7. Boyd J., and Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63 (2007) 616-626
8. City Law "Master Plan of Saint Petersburg and borders of the Cultural Heritage protection Zone" (http://www.kgainfo.spb.ru). Committee for City Planning and Architecture of the St.Petersburg City Administration.
9. Cullingworth B., and Nadin V. Town and Country Planning in the UK. fourteenth ed. (2006), Routledge 585 p
10. Duffaut, P., 2007. Urbanisme souterrain. Pano-rama historique et géographique. Techniques de l'Ingénieur C3061-2, Paris.
11. Duffaut P., and Labbe M. Les réseauxcomme germe d'urbanisme souterrain. Tunnels et ouvrages souterrains (1995) 255-261
12. Dunkel F. Underground and earth sheltered food storage: historical, geographic and economic considerations. Underground Space 9 5-6 (1985) 310-315
13. Ehrlich P.R., and Ehrlich A.H. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species (1981), Random House, New York
14. Erdem A. Subterranean space use in Cappadocia: the Uchisar example. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 23 2008 (2007) 492-499
15. Fisher B., and Turner R.K. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological Conservation 141 5 (2008) 1167-1169
16. Labs K. The architectural underground. Underground Space 1 (1976) 1-8
17. Legal and Administrative Issues in Underground Space Use: a Preliminary Survey of ITA Member Nations, 1991. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 191-209.
18. Matsumoto, R., 2005. Deep underground utilization law and its benefits. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress 2005 "Underground space use-Analysis of the Past and Lessons for the Future", Istanbul.
19. McMahon, W., Burtwell, M.H., Evans, M., 2005. Minimising street works disruption: the real costs of street works to the utility industry and society (05/WM/12/8). UK water industry research, London, UK.
20. Metropolis - World Association of the Major Metropolises. www.metropolis.org.
21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report, 2006, http://www.maweb.org/en/index.aspx.
22. Ovando-Shelley E., Ossa A., and Romo M. The sinking of Mexico City: its effects on soil properties and seismic response. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27 April (4) (2007) 333-343
23. Parriaux A., Blunier1 P., Maire P., and Tacher L. The DEEP CITY Project: a global concept for a Sustainable Urban Underground Management. Proceedings of 11th ACUUS Conference: "Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers". September 10-13, 2007, Athens, Greece (2007)
24. Parriaux, A., Tacher, L., Kaufmann, V., Blunier, P., 2006. Underground resources and sustainable development in urban areas. IAEG 2006 Engineering geology for tomorrow's cities. Nottingham.
25. Policy Statement on Legal and Administrative Issues in Underground Space Use, 1991. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 471.
26. Sterling R.L. Urban underground space use planning: a growing dilemma. Underground space and Rock Mechanics: Proceedings of the 10th ACUUS Conference on Underground Space: Economy and Environment and the ISRM Regional Symposium on Rock Mechanics for Underground Environment. TA Engineering, Moscow (2005)
27. Urban Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Asian Mega-Cities, 2004. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.
28. In: Vaouchsky N. (Ed). Integrated underground space development conception for Saint Petersburg City Master Plan (2003), Centre for Integrated Underground Space Utilization, St.Petersburg, Russia (in Russian)
29. Wende W., Hanusch M., Gassner E., Guennewig D., Koeppel J., Lambrecht H., Langenheld A., Peters W., and Roethke-Habeck P. Requirements of the SEA Directive and the German Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan. European Environment 14 2 (2004) 105-122
30. Westman W. How much are nature's services worth. Science 197 (1977) 960-964