Efficient named entity annotation through pre-empting

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2015-January, Issue , 2015, Pages 123-130

  Derczynski, Leon ^a   Bontcheva, Kalina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOWN-STREAM; LINGUISTIC ANNOTATIONS; NAMED ENTITIES; PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84949795498     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Aker, M. El-Haj, M.-D. Albakour, and U. Kruschwitz. 2012. Assessing crowdsourcing quality through objective tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1456-1461.
2. K. Bontcheva, I. Roberts, L. Derczynski, and D. Rout. 2014. The GATE Crowdsourcing Plugin: Crowdsourcing Annotated Corpora Made Easy. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL). Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. K. Bontcheva, L. Derczynski, and I. Roberts. 2015. Crowdsourcing named entity recognition and entity linking corpora. In N. Ide and J. Pustejovsky, editors, The Handbook of Linguistic Annotation (to appear). Springer.
4. H. Daumé III. 2004. Notes on CG and LMBFGS optimization of logistic regression. Paper available at http://pub.hal3.name# daume04cg-bfgs, implementation available at http://hal3.name/megam/, August.
5. L. Derczynski and K. Bontcheva. 2014. Passiveaggressive sequence labeling with discriminative post-editing for recognising person entities in tweets. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 2, pages 69-73.
6. L. Derczynski, D. Maynard, N. Aswani, and K. Bontcheva. 2013. Microblog-Genre Noise and Impact on Semantic Annotation Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. ACM.
7. L. Derczynski, D. Maynard, G. Rizzo, M. van Erp, G. Gorrell, R. Troncy, and K. Bontcheva. 2015. Analysis of named entity recognition and linking for tweets. Information Processing and Management, 51:32-49.
8. J. Eisenstein. 2013. What to do about bad language on the internet. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 359-369. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. T. Finin,W. Murnane, A. Karandikar, N. Keller, J. Martineau, and M. Dredze. 2010. Annotating named entities in Twitter data with crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon's Mechanical Turk, pages 80-88.
10. J. Finkel, T. Grenager, and C. Manning. 2005. Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 363-370. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. D. Garrette and J. Baldridge. 2013. Learning a partof- speech tagger from two hours of annotation. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 138-147.
12. D. Hovy, T. Berg-Kirkpatrick, A. Vaswani, and E. Hovy. 2013. Learning Whom to trust with MACE. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 1120-1130.
13. Y. Hu, K. Talamadupula, S. Kambhampati, et al. 2013. Dude, srsly?: The surprisingly formal nature of Twitter's language. Proceedings of ICWSM.
14. T. Joachims. 1999. Svmlight: Support vector machine. SVM-Light Support Vector Machine http://svmlight. joachims. org/, University of Dortmund, 19(4).
15. S. Khanna, A. Ratan, J. Davis, and W. Thies. 2010. Evaluating and improving the usability of Mechanical Turk for low-income workers in India. In Proceedings of the first ACM symposium on computing for development. ACM.
16. S. Krug. 2009. Don't make me think: A common sense approach to web usability. Pearson Education.
17. F. Laws, C. Scheible, and H. Schütze. 2011. Active learning with amazon mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 1546-1556. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. K. Morik, P. Brockhausen, and T. Joachims. 1999. Combining statistical learning with a knowledgebased approach - a case study in intensive care monitoring. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-99), pages 268-277, San Francisco.
19. L. Ratinov and D. Roth. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 147-155. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20. A. Ritter, S. Clark, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. 2011. Named entity recognition in tweets: An experimental study. In Proc. of Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Edinburgh, UK.
21. M. Rowe, M. Stankovic, A. Dadzie, B. Nunes, and A. Cano. 2013. Making sense of microposts (#msm2013): Big things come in small packages. In Proceedings of the WWW Conference - Workshops.
22. M. Sabou, K. Bontcheva, L. Derczynski, and A. Scharl. 2014. Corpus annotation through crowdsourcing: Towards best practice guidelines. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC14), pages 859-866.
23. D. Shen, J. Zhang, J. Su, G. Zhou, and C.-L. Tan. 2004. Multi-criteria-based active learning for named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. G. Szarvas, R. Farkas, L. Felföldi, A. Kocsor, and J. Csirik. 2006. A highly accurate named entity corpus for hungarian. In Proceedings of International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
25. E. F. Tjong Kim Sang and F. D. Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2003, pages 142-147. Edmonton, Canada.
26. E. F. Tjong Kim Sang. 2002. Introduction to the CoNLL-2002 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002, pages 155-158. Taipei, Taiwan.
27. K. Toutanova, D. Klein, C. D. Manning, and Y. Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, NAACL '03, pages 173-180.
28. A. Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the conference on Computational linguistics, pages 947-953. Association for Computational Linguistics.