A Look to the Future

The SAGE Handbook of Remote Sensing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 475-481

  Foody, Giles M ^a   Warner, Timothy A ^b   Nellis, M Duane ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949769009     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9780857021052.n34     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Asner, G. and S. V.Ollinger, in this volume. Remote Sensing for Terrestrial Biogeochemical Modeling. Chapter 29.
2. AsnerG. P. D.Nepstad G.Cardinot D.Ray. Drought stress and carbon uptake in an Amazon forest measured with spaceborne imaging spectroscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 6039-6044. 2004. doi:10.1073/pnas.0400168101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400168101
3. Bergen, K. M A. M.Gilboy D. G.Brown. Multidimensional vegetation structure in modeling avian habitat. Ecological Informatics 2 9-22. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.01.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.01.001
4. Boyd, D. S. F. M.Danson. Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development. Progress in Physical Geography 29 1-26. 2005. doi:10.1191/0309133305pp432ra http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp432ra
5. Boyd, D. S. G. M.Foody P. J.Curran R. M.Lucas M.Honzak. An assessment of radiance in Landsat TM middle and thermal infrared wavebands for the detection of tropical forest regeneration. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17 249-261. 1996. doi:10.1080/01431169608949003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949003
6. Campbell, J., in this volume. Remote Sensing of Soils. Chapter 24.
7. Carleer, A. E.Wolff. Exploitation of very high resolution satellite data for tree species identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70 135-140. 2004.
8. Cayuela, L. J. M.Benayas A.Justel J.Salas-Rey. Modelling tree diversity in a highly fragmented tropical montane landscape. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15 602-613. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00255.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00255.x
9. Chapin, F. S. E. S.Zavaleta V. T.Eviner R. L.Naylor P. M.Vitousek H. L.Reynolds D. U.Hooper S.Lavorel O. E.Sala S. E.Hobbie M. C.Mack S.Diaz. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405 234-242. 2000. doi:10.1038/35012241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35012241
10. Chen, X. and D.Campagna, in this volume. Remote Sensing of Geology. Chapter 23.
11. Chowdhury, R. R. Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: Modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels. Applied Geography 26 129-152. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.004
12. Clark, D. B. J. M.Read M. L.Clark A. M.Cruz M. F.Dotti D. A.Clark. Application of 1-M and 4-M resolution satellite data to ecological studies of tropical rain forests. Ecological Applications 14 61-74. 2004a. doi:10.1890/02-5120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/02-5120
13. Clark, D. B. C. S.Castro L. D. A.Alvarado J. M.Read. Quantifying mortality of tropical rain forest trees using high-spatial-resolution satellite data. Ecology Letters 7 52-59. 2004b. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00547.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00547.x
14. Cohen, W. B. S. N.Goward. Landsat's role in ecological applications of remote sensing. Bioscience 54 535-545. 2004. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0535:LRIEAO]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568%282004%29054%5B0535:LRIEAO%5D2.0.CO;2
15. Cracknell, A. P. and D. S.Boyd, in this volume. Interactions of Middle Infrared (3-5 μm) Radiation with the Environment. Chapter 4.
16. Crews, K. and S. J.Walsh, in this volume. Remote Sensing and the Social Sciences. Chapter 31.
17. Curran, P. J., 1985. Principles of Remote Sensing.Longman, Harlow.
18. Dash, J. P. J.Curran. The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 5403-5413. 2004. doi:10.1080/0143116042000274015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116042000274015
19. DeFries, R. S. S. O.Los. Implications of land-cover misclassification for parameter estimates in global land-surface models: An example from the simple biosphere model (SiB2). Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65 1083-1088. 1999.
20. Deng, Y., in this volume. Making Sense of the Third Dimension Through Topographic Analysis. Chapter 22.
21. Dozier, J., in this volume. Remote Sensing of the Cryosphere. Chapter 28.
22. Duro, D. N. C.Coops M. A.Wulder T.Han. Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing. Progress in Physical Geography 31 235-260. 2007. doi:10.1177/0309133307079054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309133307079054
23. Foody, G. M. Monitoring the magnitude of land-cover change around the southern limits of the Sahara. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67 841-847. 2001.
24. Foody, G. M. Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing, (in press) 2008.
25. Foody, G. M. M. E. J.Cutler. Tree biodiversity in protected and logged Bornean tropical rain forests and its measurement by satellite remote sensing. Journal of Biogeography 30 1053-1066. 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00887.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00887.x
26. Foody, G. M. A.Mathur C.Sanchez-Hernandez D. S.Boyd. Training set size requirements for the classification of a specific class. Remote Sensing of Environment 104 1-14. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.004
27. Fuller, R. M. B. J.Devereux S.Gillings R. A.Hill G. S.Amable. Bird distributions relative to remotely sensed habitats in Great Britain: Towards a framework for national modeling. Journal of Environmental Management 84 586-605. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.001
28. Gaston, K. J. Biodiversity and extinction: species and people. Progress in Physical Geography 29 239-247. 2005. doi:10.1191/0309133305pp445pr http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp445pr
29. Gewin, V. Mapping opportunities. Nature 427 376-377. 2004. doi:10.1038/nj6972-376a http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nj6972-376a
30. GoetzS. D.Steinberg R.Dubayah B.Blair. Laser remote sensing of canopy habitat heterogeneity as a predictor of bird species richness in an eastern temperate forest, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 108 254-263. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.016
31. Goodwin, N. R.Turner R.Merton. Classifying Eucalyptus forests with high spatial and spectral resolution imagery: an investigation of individual species and vegetation communities. Australian Journal of Botany 53 337-345. 2005. doi:10.1071/BT04085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT04085
32. Goward, S. N., T.Arvidson, D. L.Williams, R.Irish and J.Irons, in this volume. Moderate Spatial Resolution Optical Sensors. Chapter 9.
33. Haara, A. M.Haarala. Tree species classification using semi-automatic delineation of trees on aerial images. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17 556-565. 2002. doi:10.1080/02827580260417215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827580260417215
34. Harris, R., in this volume. Remote Sensing Policy. Chapter 2.
35. Huang, C. L. S.Davis J. R. G.Townshend. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 725-749. 2002. doi:10.1080/01431160110040323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110040323
36. Hurtt, G. X. M.Xiao M.Keller M.Palace G. P.Asner R.Braswell E. S.Brondizio M.Cardoso C. J. R.Carvalho M. G.Fearon L.Guild S.Hagen S.Hetrick B.Moore C.Nobre J. M.Read T.Sa A.Schloss G.Vourlitis A. J.Wickel. IKONOS imagery for the Large Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA). Remote Sensing of Environment 88 111-127. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.004
37. Hutton, J. A.Melihen. Emergency response-remote sensing evolves in the wake of experience. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 72 977-981. 2006.
38. Hyyppä, J., W.Wagner, M.Hollaus and H.Hyyppä, in this volume. Airborne Laser Scanning. Chapter 14.
39. Innes, J. L. Koch, B. Forest biodiversity and its assessment by remote sensing. Global Ecology and Biogeography 7 397-419. 1998. doi:10.1046/j.1466-822X.1998.00314.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.1998.00314.x
40. Janetos, A. C. C. O.Justice. Land cover and global productivity: a measurement strategy for the NASA programme. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21 1491-1512. 2000. doi:10.1080/014311600210281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311600210281
41. Jensen, J. R., J.Im, P.Hardin, and R. R.Jensen, in this volume. Image Classification. Chapter 19.
42. Johannsen, C. J. and C. S. T.Daughtry, in this volume. Surface Reference Data Collection. Chapter 17.
43. Justice, C. O. and C. J.Tucker, in this volume. Coarse Spatial Resolution Optical Sensors. Chapter 10.
44. Kellndorfer, J. and K.McDonald, in this volume. Active and Passive Microwave Systems. Chapter 13.
45. Kerekes, J. P., in this volume. Optical Sensor Technology. Chapter 7.
46. Kerr, J. T. T. R. E.Southwood J.Cihlar. Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 11365-11370. 2001. doi:10.1073/pnas.201398398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201398398
47. Lambin, E. F. Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress in Physical Geography 21 375-393. 1997. doi:10.1177/030913339702100303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913339702100303
48. Lassau, S. A. D. F.Hochuli. Associations between wasp communities and forest structure: Do strong local patterns hold across landscapes? Austral Ecology 32 656-662. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01751.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01751.x
49. Lavender, S., in this volume. Optical Remote Sensing of the Hydrosphere: From the Open Ocean to Inland Waters. Chapter 27.
50. Leimgruber, P. C. A.Christen A.Laborderie. The impact of Landsat satellite monitoring on conservation biology. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 106 81-101. 2005. doi:10.1007/s10661-005-0763-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-0763-0
51. LepersE E. F.Lambin A. C.Janetos R.DeFries F.Achard N.Ramankutty R. J. A.Scholes. A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981-2000 Bioscience 55 115-124. 2005. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0115:ASOIOR]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568%282005%29055%5B0115:ASOIOR%5D2.0.CO;2
52. Leyequien, E. J.Verrelst M.Slot G.Schaepman-Strub I. M. A.Heitkonig A.Skidmore. Capturing the fugitive: Applying remote sensing to terrestrial animal distribution and diversity. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 9 1-20. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2006.08.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.08.002
53. Liang, S., in this volume. Quantitative Models and Inversion in Optical Remote Sensing. Chapter 20.
54. Lillesand, T. M., R. W.Kiefer and J. W.Chipman, 2004. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, fifth edition, Wiley, New York.
55. Luoto, M. M.Kuussaari T.Toivonen. Modelling butterfly distribution based on remote sensing data. Journal of Biogeography 29 1027-1037. 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00728.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00728.x
56. Luoto, M. R.Virkkala R. K.Heikkinen K.Rainio. Predicting bird species richness using remote sensing in boreal agricultural-forest mosaics. Ecological Applications 14 1946-1962. 2004. doi:10.1890/02-5176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/02-5176
57. Martin, M. E. S. D.Newman J. D.Aber R. G.Congalton. Determining forest species composition using high spectral resolution remote sensing data. Remote Sensing of Environment 65 249-254. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00035-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2898%2900035-2
58. Melgani, F. L.Bruzzone. Classification of hypersepectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42 1778-1790. 2004. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865
59. Menon, S. R. G.Pontius J.Rose M. L.Khan K. S.Bawa. Identifying conservation-priority areas in the tropics: a land-use change modeling approach. Conservation Biology 15 501-512. 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002501.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002501.x
60. Merchant, J. and S.Narumalani, in this volume. Integrating Remote Sensing and Geographic Information systems. Chapter 18.
61. Moghaddam, M., in this volume. Polarimetric SAR Phenomenology and Inversion Techniques for Vegetated Terrain. Chapter 6.
62. Mondello, C. G. F.Hepner R. A.Williamson. 10-year industry forecast. Phases I-III - study documentation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70 5-58. 2004.
63. Mondello, C. G. F.Hepner R. A.Williamson. 10-year remote sensing industry forecast. Phase IV - study documentation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 72 985-1000. 2006.
64. Muldavin, E. H. P.Neville G.Harper. Indices of grassland biodiversity in the Chihuahuan Desert ecoregion derived from remote sensing. Conservation Biology 15 844-855. 2001. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004844.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004844.x
65. Nabiullin, A. A., in press. Measuring remote sensing science: bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1975-2005. International Journal of Remote Sensing.
66. National Science and Technology Council, 2007. A Plan for a U.S. National Land Imaging Program, Office of Science and Technology Policy, 120 pp. (available at http://www.ostp.gov).
67. Nellis, M. D., K.Price and D.Rundquist, in this volume. Remote Sensing Applications in Agriculture. Chapter 26.
68. Nepstad, D. C. A.Verissimo A.Alencar C.Nobre E.Lima P.Lefebvre P.Schlesinger C.Potter P.Moutinho E.Mendoza M.Cochrane V.Brooks. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire Nature 398 505-508. 1999. doi:10.1038/19066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/19066
69. Nichol, J., in this volume. Remote Sensing of Urban Areas. Chapter 30.
70. Osborne, P. E. G. M.Foody S.Suarez-Seoane. Non-stationarity and local approaches to modelling the distributions of wildlife. Diversity and Distributions 13 313-323. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00344.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00344.x
71. Pal, M. P. M.Mather. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26 1007-1011. 2005. doi:10.1080/01431160512331314083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331314083
72. Quattrochi, D. and J. C.Luvall, in this volume. Thermal Remote Sensing in Earth Science Research. Chapter 5.
73. Rindfuss, R. R. S. J.Walsh B. L.Turner J.Fox V.Mishra. Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 13976-13981. 2004. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401545101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0401545101
74. Rocchini, D. C.Ricotta. Are landscapes as crisp as we may think? Ecological Modelling 204 535-539. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.028
75. Sanchez-Azofelfa, G. A. K. L.Castro B.Rivard M. R.Kalascka R. C.Harriss. Remote sensing research priorities in tropical dry forest environments. Biotropica 35 134-142. 2003.
76. Sanchez-Hernandez, C. D. S.Boyd G. M.Foody. One-class classification for mapping a specific land-cover class: SVDD classification of fenland. IEEE T ransactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 45 1061-1073. 2007. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2006.890414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.890414
77. Schaepman, M. E., in this volume. Imaging Spectrometers. Chapter 12.
78. Schaepman-Strub, G., M. E.Schaepman, J. V.Martonchik, T. H.Painter, and S.Dangel, in this volume. Radiometry and Reflectance: From Concepts to Measured Quantities. Chapter 15.
79. Southworth, J. H.Nagendra D. K.Munroe. Are parks working? Exploring human-environment tradeoffs in protected area conservation. Applied Geography 26 87-95. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.001
80. Stehman, S. V. and G.M.Foody, in this volume. Accuracy Assessment. Chapter 21.
81. Steven, M. D. T. J.Malthus F.Baret H.Xu M. J.Chopping. Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems. Remote Sensing of Environment 88 412-422. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.010
82. Stow, D., L. L.Coulter and C. A.Benkelman, in this volume. Airborne Digital Multispectral Imaging. Chapter 11.
83. Strahler, A. H., L.Boschetti, G. M.Foody, M. A.Friedl, M. C.Hansen, M.Herold, P.Mayaux, J. T.Morisette, S. V.Stehman and C. E.Woodcock, 2006. Global Land Cover Validation: Recommendations for Evaluation and Accuracy Assessment of Global Land Cover Maps, Euopean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, EUR 22156 EN, 48 pp.
84. Teeuw, R., P.Aplin, N.McWilliam, T.Wicks, K.Matthieu, and G.Ernst, in this volume. Hazard Assessment and Disaster Management Using Remote Sensing. Chapter 32.
85. Toutin, T., in this volume. Fine Spatial Resolution Optical Sensors. Chapter 8.
86. Trisurat, Y. A.Eiumnoh S.Murai M. Z.Hussain R. P.Shrestha. Improvement of tropical vegetation mapping using a remote sensing technique: a case of Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21 2031-2042. 2000. doi:10.1080/01431160050021277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160050021277
87. Turner, W. S.Spector N.Gardiner M.Fladeland E.Sterling M.Steininger. Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 306-314. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00070-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347%2803%2900070-3
88. van der Meer, F., H.van der Werff and S.de Jong, in this volume. Pre-processing of Optical Imagery. Chapter 16.
89. van Leeeuwen, W. J. D., in this volume. Visible, Near-IR, and Shortwave IR Spectral Characteristics of Terrestrial Surfaces. Chapter 3.
90. Wang, L. W. P.Sousa P.Gong G. S.Biging. Compar-isonofIKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama. Remote Sensing of Environment 91 432-440. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.005
91. Warner, T., M. D.Nellis and G.Foody, in this volume. Remote Sensing Data Selection Issues. Chapter 1.
92. Wilson, R. J. C. D.Thomas R.Fox D. B.Roy W. E. S.Kunin. Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change Nature 432 393-396. 2004. doi:10.1038/nature03031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03031
93. Wulder, M., J. C.White, S.Ortlepp and N. C.Coops, in this volume. Remote Sensing for Studies of Vegetation Condition: Theory and Application. Chapter 25.