Remote Sensing for Studies of Vegetation Condition: Theory and Application

The SAGE Handbook of Remote Sensing

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 357-367

  Wulder, Michael A ^a   White, Joanne C ^b   Coops, Nicholas C ^c   Ortlepp, Stephanie ^d  

^a The Pacific Forestry Centre ^*

^b PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949799660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9780857021052.n25     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Anger, C. D., S.Mah, and S. K.Babey, 1994. Technological enhancements to the compact airborne spectrographic imager (casi). In Proceedings of the Second International Airborne Remote Sensing Conference and Exhibition, September 12-15 Strasbourg, France. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: ERIM International, Inc. pp. 205-214.
2. Asner, G. P. A. S.Warner. Canopy shadow in the LBA IKONOS satellite archive: Implications for multispectral studies of tropical forests and savannas. Remote Sensing of Environment 87 521-533. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.006
3. Asner, G. P., J. A.Hicke, and D. B.Lobell, 2003. Per-pixel analysis of forest structure: vegetation indices, spectral mixture analysis, and canopy reflectance modelling. In: M. A.Wulder, and S. E.Franklin, (eds), Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies.Kluwer Academic, Boston: pp. 209-254. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_8
4. Blackburn, G. A. Spectral indices for estimating photosynthetic pigment concentrations: a test using senescent tree leaves. International Journal of Remote Sensing 19 657-675. 1998. doi:10.1080/014311698215919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311698215919
5. Carter, G. A. A. K.Knapp. Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. American Journal of Botany 88 677-684. 2001. doi:10.2307/2657068 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657068
6. Chappelle, E. W. M. S.Kim J. E.McMurtrey. Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra (RARS): an algorithm for the remote estimation of the concentrations of chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B and the carotenoids in soybean leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment 39 239-247. 1992. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(92)90089-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257%2892%2990089-3
7. Cocks, T., R.Jenssen, and A.Stewart, 1998. The HyMap airborne hyperspectral sensor: The system, calibration and performance. In M.Schaepman et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 1st EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy.Remote Sensing Laboratories, Zurich. pp. 37-42.
8. Cohen, W. B. T. A.Spies M.Fiorella. Estimating the age and structure of forests in a multi-ownership landscape of western Oregon, U.S.A. International Journal of Remote Sensing 16 721-746. 1995. doi:10.1080/01431169508954436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954436
9. Coops, N. C. N.Goodwin C.Stone N.Sims. Assessment of forest plantation canopy condition from high spatial resolution digital imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 32 19-32. 2006. doi:10.5589/m06-002 http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m06-002
10. Crist, E. P. R. C.Cicone. A physically-based transformation of Thematic Mapper data - the Tasselled Cap IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 22 256-263. 1984. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1984.350619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1984.350619
11. Culvenor, D.2003. Extracting individual tree information: A survey of techniques for high spatial resolution imagery. In: M. A.Wulder, and S. E.Franklin, (eds), Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies.Kluwer Academic, Boston: pp. 255-277. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_9
12. Dial, G. H.Bowen F.Gerlach J.Grodecki R.Oleszczuk. IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products. Remote Sensing of Environment 88 23-36. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.014
13. Dymond, C. C. D. J.Mladenoff V. C.Radeloff. Phenological differences in Tasseled Cap indices improve deciduous forest classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 80 460-472. 2002. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00324-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2801%2900324-8
14. Franklin, S. E. Lavigne, M. B. Moskal, L. M. Wulder, M. A. T. M.McCaffrey. Interpretation of forest harvest conditions in New Brunswick using Landsat TM enhanced wetness difference imagery (EWDI). Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 27 118-128. 2001.
15. Franklin, S. E. Lavigne, M. Wulder, M. A. G. B.Stenhouse. Change detection and landscape structure mapping using remote sensing. The Forestry Chronicle 78 618-625. 2002.
16. Franklin, S. M.Wulder R.Skakun A. L.Carroll. Mountain pine beetle red attack damage classification using stratified Landsat TM data in British Columbia, Canada. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69 283-288. 2003.
17. Franklin, S. E. C. B.Jagielko M. B.Lavigne. Sensitivity of the Landsat enhanced wetness difference index (EWDI) to temporal resolution. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 31 149-152. 2005. doi:10.5589/m05-005 http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m05-005
18. Gamon, J. A., and H. L.Qiu, 1999. Ecological applications of remote sensing at multiple scales. In: F. I.Pugnaire and F.Valladares, (eds), Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology.Marcel Dekker Inc., New York: pp. 805-846.
19. Gamon, J. A. K. F.Huemmrich D. R.Peddle J.Chen D.Fuentes F. G.Hall J. S.Kimball S.Goetz J.Gu K. C.McDonald J. R.Miller M.Moghaddam A. F.Rahman J.-L.Rougean E. A.Smith C. L.Walthall P.Zarco-Tejada B.Hu R.Fernandes J.Cihlar. Remote Sensing in BOREAS: Lessons Learned. Remote Sensing of Environment 30 139-162. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.08.017
20. Goetz, S. J. R. K.Wright A. J.Smith E.Zinecker E.Schaub. IKONOS imagery for resource management: Tree cover, impervious surfaces, and riparian buffer analysis in the mid-Atlantic region. Remote Sensing of Environment 88 195-208. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.07.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.07.010
21. Gould, W. Remote sensing of vegetation, plant species richness, and regional biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Applications 10 1861-1870. 2000. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1861:RSOVPS]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761%282000%29010%5B1861:RSOVPS%5D2.0.CO;2
22. Healy, S. P. Z.Yang W. B.Cohen D. J.Pierce. Application of two regression-based methods to estimate the effects of partial harvest on forest structure using Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment 101 115-126. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.006
23. Hoffer, A. M.1978. Biological and physical considerations in applying computer-aided analysis techniques to remote sensor data. In: P. H.Swain and S. M.Davis (eds), Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach.McGraw-Hill, New York. Chapter 5: 227-289.
24. Homer, C. R.Ramsey T.Edwards A.Falconer. Landscape cover-type modeling using a multi-scene thematic mapper mosaic. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63 59-67. 1997.
25. Huang, C. B.Wylie C.Homer L.Yang G.Zylstra. Derivation of a tasseled cap Transformation based on Landsat-7 at-sensor reflectance. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23 1741-1748. 2002. doi:10.1080/01431160110106113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110106113
26. Kneppeck, I. D. F. J.Ahern. A comparison of images from a pushbroom scanner with normal color aerial photographs for detecting scattered recent conifer mortality. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55 333-337. 1989.
27. Lefsky, M. A., and W. B.Cohen, 2003. Selection of remotely sensed data. In: M. A.Wulder, and S. E.Franklin, (eds), Remote Sensing of Forest Environments: Concepts and Case Studies.Kluwer Academic, Boston: pp. 13-46. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0306-4_2
28. Lei, J. A. J.Peters. Performance evaluation of spectral vegetation indices using a statistical sensitivity function. Remote Sensing of Environment 106 59-65. 2007. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.010
29. Lillesand, T. M. and R. W.Kiefer, 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 4th edition.John Wiley and Sons, New York, 736 p.
30. Lunetta, R. S. D. M.Johnson J. G.Lyon J.Crotwell. Impacts of imagery temporal frequency on land-cover change detection monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment 89 444-454. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.022
31. Luther, J. E. R. A.Fournier D. E.Piercey L.Guindon R. J.Hall. Biomass mapping using forest type and structure derived from Landsat TM imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation 8 173-187. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2005.09.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2005.09.002
32. Maki, M. M.Ishiara M.Tamura. Estimation of leaf water status to monitor the risk of forest fires by using remotely sensed data Remote Sensing Environment 90 441-450. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.002
33. Morisette, J. T. J. E.Nickeson P.Davis Y.Wang Y.Tian C. E.Woodcock N.Shabanov M.Hansen W. B.Cohen D. R.Oetter R. E.Kennedy. High spatial resolution satellite observations for validation of MODIS land products: IKONOS observations acquired under the NASA scientific data purchase. Remote Sensing of Environment 88 100-110. 2003. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.04.003
34. Radeloff, V. D.Mladenoff M.Boyce. Detecting Jack Pine budworm defoliation using sprectral mixture analysis: separating effects from determinants. Remote Sensing of Environment 69 156-169. 1999. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00008-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2899%2900008-5
35. Roberts, D. A. B. W.Nelson J. B.Adams F.Palmer. Spectral changes with leaf aging in Amazon caatinga. Trees 12 315-325. 1998. doi:10.1007/s004680050157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004680050157
36. Rock, B. J.Vogelmann D.Williams A.Vogelmann T.Hoshizaki. Remote detection of forest damage. BioScience 36 439-445. 1986. doi:10.2307/1310339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1310339
37. Rogan, J. and J.Miller, 2006. Integrating GIS and remotely sensed data for mapping forest disturbance and change. Chapter 6 in M.Wulder, and S.Franklin (eds), Forest Disturbance and Spatial Pattern: Remote Sensing and GIS Approaches.Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, 264 p.
38. Rossini, M. C.Panigada M.Meroni R.Colombo. Assessment of oak forest condition based onleaf biochemical variables and chlorophyll fluroescence. T ree Physiology 26 1487-1496. 2006.
39. Skakun, R. S. M. A.Wulder S. E.Franklin. Sensitivity of the thematic mapper enhanced wetness difference index to detect mountain pine beetle red attack damage. Remote Sensing Environment 86 433-443. 2003. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00112-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257%2803%2900112-3
40. Slaton, M. R. W. K.Smith. Estimating near-infrared leaf reflectance from leaf structural characteristics. American Journal of Botany 88 278-284. 2001. doi:10.2307/2657019 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657019
41. Stone, C. L.Chisholm N.Coops. Spectral reflectance characteristics of eucalypt foliage damaged by insects. Australian Journal of Botany 49 687-698. 2001. doi:10.1071/BT00091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT00091
42. Strahler, A. C.Woodcock J.Smith. On the nature of models in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 20 121-139. 1986. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(86)90018-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257%2886%2990018-0
43. Tao, C. V. Y.Hu W.Jiang. Photogrammetric exploitation of IKONOS imagery for mapping applications. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 2833-2853. 2004. doi:10.1080/01431160310001618392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160310001618392
44. Tian, Q. Q.Tong R.Pu X.Guo C.Zhao. Spectroscopic determination of wheat water status using 1650-1850 nm spectral absorption features International Journal of Remote Sensing 10 2329-2338. 2001.
45. Ustin, S. D.Roberts J.Gamon R.Green. Using imaging spectroscopy to study ecosystem processes and properties. BioScience 54 523-534. 2004. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0523:UISTSE]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568%282004%29054%5B0523:UISTSE%5D2.0.CO;2
46. Vane, G. A.Goetz. Terrestrial imaging spec-trometry: current status, future trends. Remote Sensing of Environment 44 117-126. 1993. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(93)90011-L http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257%2893%2990011-L
47. Vane, G. R. O.Green T. G.Chrien H. T.Enmark E. G.Hansen W. M.Porter. The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer. R emote Sensing of the Environment 44 127-143. 1993. doi:10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257%2893%2990012-M
48. White, J. C. M. A.Wulder D.Brooks R.Reich R.Wheate. Mapping mountain pine beetle infestation with high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 96 240-251. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.007
49. Wulder, M. Optical remote-sening techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters. Progress in Physical geography 24 (4) 449-476. 1998.
50. Wulder, M. A. R.Hall N.Coops S.Franklin. High spatial resolution remotely sensed data for ecosystem characterization. BioScience 54 1-11. 2004a. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0511:HSRRSD]2.0.CO;2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568%282004%29054%5B0511:HSRRSD%5D2.0.CO;2
51. Wulder, M. A. S.Franklin J. C.White. Sensitivity of hyperclustering and labeling land cover classes to Land-sat image acquisition date. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 5337-5344. 2004b. doi:10.1080/0143116042000192385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116042000192385
52. Wulder, M. A. R. S.Skakun S. E.Franklin J. C.White. Enhancing forest inventories with mountain pine beetle infestation information. Forestry Chronicle 81 149-159. 2005.
53. Wulder, M. A. J. C.White B.Bentz M. F.Alvarez N. C.Coops. Estimating the probability of mountain pine beetle red attack damage. Remote Sensing of Environment 101 150-166. 2006a. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.12.010
54. Wulder, M. A. C. C.Dymond J. C.White D. G.Leckie Carroll, A. L. Surveying mountain pine beetle damage of forests: A review of remote sensing opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 221 27-41. 2006b. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.09.021
55. Zarco-Tejada, P. J. A.Berjón R.López-Lozano J. R.Miller P.Martín V.Cachorro M. R.González A.Frutos. Assessing Vineyard Condition with Hyperspectral Indices: Leaf and Canopy Reflectance Simulation in a RowStructured Discontinuous Canopy. Remote Sensing of Environment 99 271-287. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.09.002
56. Zheng, D. J.Rademacher T.Chen M.Bresee J.Le Moine S.Ryu. Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a manged landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment 93 402-411. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.08.008