The effects of tDCS across the spatial frequencies and orientations that comprise the contrast sensitivity function

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue NOV, 2015, Pages

  Richard, Bruno ^a,b   Johnson, Aaron P ^a   Thompson, Benjamin ^c,d   Hansen, Bruce C ^e  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^e Assistant Professor in the University Libraries   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Orientation; Spatial frequency; Spatial vision; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949654616     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01784     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Accornero, N., Li Voti, P., La Riccia, M., and Gregori, B. (2007). Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization. Exp. Brain Res. 178, 261-266. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0733-y
2. Adini, Y., Sagi, D., and Tsodyks, M. (2002). Context-enabled learning in the human visual system. Nature 415, 790-793. doi: 10.1038/415790a
3. Adini, Y., Wilkonsky, A., Haspel, R., Tsodyks, M., and Sagi, D. (2004). Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination: the effect of contrast uncertainty. J. Vis. 4, 993-1005. doi: 10.1167/4.12.2
4. Antal, A., Kincses, T. Z., Nitsche, M. A., Bartfai, O., and Paulus, W. (2004a). Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 702-707. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0688
5. Antal, A., Nitsche, M. A., Kruse, W., Kincses, T. Z., Hoffmann, K.-P., and Paulus, W. (2004b). Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 521-527. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057263
6. Antal, A., Nitsche, M. A., and Paulus, W. (2001). External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport 12, 3553-3555. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200111160-00036
7. Antal, A., Nitsche, M. A., and Paulus, W. (2006). Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Res. Bull. 68, 459-463. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.006
8. Appelle, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychol. Bull. 78, 266-278. doi: 10.1037/h0033117
9. Bex, P. J., Mareschal, I., and Dakin, S. C. (2007). Contrast gain control in natural scenes. J. Vis. 7, 1-12. doi: 10.1167/7.11.12
10. Bikson, M., Datta, A., and Elwassif, M. (2009). Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. Off. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120, 1033-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.018
11. Bikson, M., Name, A., and Rahman, A. (2013). Origins of specificity during tDCS: anatomical, activity-selective, and input-bias mechanisms. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:688. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00688
12. Blin, O., Mestre, D., Paut, O., Vercher, J. L., and Audebert, C. (1993). GABA-ergic control of visual perception in healthy volunteers: effects of midazolam, a benzodiazepine, on spatio-temporal contrast sensitivity. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 36, 117-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb04206.x
13. Campbell, F. W., Kulikowski, J. J., and Levinson, J. (1966). The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J. Physiol. 187, 427-436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100
14. Chaieb, L., Antal, A., and Paulus, W. (2008). Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Vis. Neurosci. 25, 77-81. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080097
15. Chatrian, G. E., Lettich, E., and Nelson, P. L. (1985). Ten Percent Electrode System for Topographic Studies of Spontaneous and Evoked EEG Activities. Am. J. EEG Technol. 25, 83-92. doi: 10.1080/00029238.1985.11080163
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edn. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Costa, T. L., Gualtieri, M., Barboni, M. T. S., Katayama, R. K., Boggio, P. S., and Ventura, D. F. (2015). Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields. Exp. Brain Res 233, 1391-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4213-0
18. Cumming, G., and Finch, S. (2001). A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educ. Psychol. 61, 532-574. doi: 10.1177/0013164401614002
19. Datta, A., Bansal, V., Diaz, J., Patel, J., Reato, D., and Bikson, M. (2009). Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul 2, 201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005
20. De Valois, R. L., Albrecht, D. G., and Thorell, L. G. (1982). Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res. 22, 545-559. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90113-4
21. Dorais, A., and Sagi, D. (1997). Contrast masking effects change with practice. Vision Res. 37, 1725-1733. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00329-X
22. Duecker, F., and Sack, A. T. (2015). Rethinking the role of sham TMS. Front. Psychol. 6:210. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00210
23. Edden, R. A. E., Muthukumaraswamy, S. D., Freeman, T. C., and Singh, K. D. (2009). Orientation discrimination performance is predicted by GABA concentration and gamma oscillation frequency in human primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 15721-15726. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4426-09.2009
24. Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., and Wandell, B. A. (1997). Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 7, 181-192. doi: 10.1093/cercor/7.2.181
25. Essock, E. A. (1980). The oblique effect of stimulus identification considered with respect to two classes of oblique effects. Perception 9, 37-46. doi: 10.1068/p090037
26. Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. Am. Psychol. 50, 5-13. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.1.5
27. Ferster, D., and Miller, K. D. K. (2000). Neuron mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 441-471. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441
28. Fertonani, A., Ferrari, C., and Miniussi, C. (2015). What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects. Clin. Neurophysiol 126, 2181-2188. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.015
29. Foster, K. H., Gaska, J. P., Nagler, M., and Pollen, D. A. (1985). Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J. Physiol. 365, 331-363. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015776
30. Graham, N. V. (1989). Visual Pattern Analyzers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31. Graham, N. V., Robson, J. G., and Nachmias, J. (1978). Grating summation in fovea and periphery. Vision Res. 18, 815-825. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90122-0
32. Grill-Spector, K., and Malach, R. (2004). The human visual cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 649-677. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144220
33. Hansen, B. C., Richard, B., Andres, K., Johnson, A. P., Thompson, B., and Essock, E. A. (2015). A cortical locus for anisotropic overlay suppression of stimuli presented at fixation. Vis. Neurosci. 32, E023. doi: 10.1017/S0952523815000255
34. Henriksson, L., Nurminen, L., Hyvärinen, A., and Vanni, S. (2008). Spatial frequency tuning in human retinotopic visual areas. J. Vis. 8, 1-13. doi: 10.1167/8.10.5
35. Horton, J. C. (2006). Ocular integration in the human visual cortex. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 41, 584-593. doi: 10.1016/S0008-4182(06)80027-X
36. Jacobson, L., Koslowsky, M., and Lavidor, M. (2012). TDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp. Brain Res. 216, 1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9
37. Katzner, S., Busse, L., and Carandini, M. (2011). GABAA inhibition controls response gain in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 5931-5941. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5753-10.2011
38. Kessler, S. K., Turkeltaub, P. E., Benson, J. G., and Hamilton, R. H. (2012). Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 5, 155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.02.007
39. Kingdom, F. A. A., and Prins, N. (2010). PsychophysicsA Practical Introduction. 1st Edn. London: Elsevier.
40. Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Kraft, A., Roehmel, J., Olma, M. C., Schmidt, S., Irlbacher, K., and Brandt, S. A. (2010). Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Exp. Brain Res. 207, 283-290. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2453-6
42. Lang, N., Siebner, H. R., Chadaide, Z., Boros, K., Nitsche, M. A., Rothwell, J. C., et al. (2007). Bidirectional modulation of primary visual cortex excitability: a combined tDCS and rTMS study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 5782-5787. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0706
43. Lapenta, O. M., Minati, L., Fregni, F., and Boggio, P. S. (2013). Je pense donc je fais: transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain oscillations associated with motor imagery and movement observation. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:256. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00256
44. Legge, G. E. (1978). Space domain properties of a spatial frequency channel in human vision. Vision Res. 18, 959-969. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90024-X
45. Li, G., Yang, Y., Liang, Z., Xia, J., Yang, Y., and Zhou, Y. (2008). GABA-mediated inhibition correlates with orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex of cat. Neuroscience 155, 914-922. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.06.032
46. Li, R., Polat, U., Makous, W., and Bavelier, D. (2009). Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through video game training. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 549-551. doi: 10.1038/nn.2296
47. Maehara, G., and Goryo, K. (2007). Perceptual learning in monocular pattern masking: experiments and explanations by the twin summation gain control model of contrast processing. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 1009-1021. doi: 10.3758/BF03193939
48. Meese, T. S., and Hess, R. F. (2004). Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. J. Vis. 4, 843-859. doi: 10.1167/4.10.2
49. Meese, T. S., and Summers, R. J. (2007). Area summation in human vision at and above detection threshold. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274, 2891-2900. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.3002
50. Minhas, P., Datta, A., and Bikson, M. (2011). Cutaneous perception during tDCS: role of electrode shape and sponge salinity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 122, 637-638. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.09.023
51. Miniussi, C., Harris, J. A., and Ruzzoli, M. (2013). Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 37, 1702-1712. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014
52. Miniussi, C., Ruzzoli, M., and Walsh, V. (2010). The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition. Cortex 46, 128-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.004
53. Miranda, P. C., Lomarev, M., and Hallett, M. (2006). Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1623-1629. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.009
54. Miranda, P. C., Mekonnen, A., Salvador, R., and Ruffini, G. (2013). The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation. Neuroimage 70, 48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.034
55. Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., et al. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 1, 206-223. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
56. Nitsche, M. A., Doemkes, S., Karaköse, T., Antal, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., et al. (2007). Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 3109-3117. doi: 10.1152/jn.01312.2006
57. Nitsche, M. A., Fricke, K., Henschke, U., Schlitterlau, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., et al. (2003a). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. J. Physiol. 553, 293-301. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916
58. Nitsche, M. A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Antal, A., Tergau, F., Paulus, W., et al. (2003b). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans [1] (multiple letters). Clin. Neurophysiol. 114, 2220-2223. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00235-9
59. O'Connell, N. E., Cossar, J., Marston, L., Wand, B. M., Bunce, D., Moseley, G. L., et al. (2012). Rethinking Clinical Trials of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: participant and Assessor Blinding Is Inadequate at Intensities of 2mA. PLoS ONE 7:e47514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047514
60. Paulus, W. (2011). Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES - tDCS; tRNS, tACS) methods. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 21, 602-617. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.557292
61. Peli, E., Arend, L. E., Young, G. M., and Goldstein, R. B. (1993). Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation. Spat. Vis. 7, 1-14. doi: 10.1163/156856893X00018
62. Pelli, D. G. (1985). Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 1508. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.2.001508
63. Pellicciari, M. C. M., Brignani, D., and Miniussi, C. (2013). Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach. Neuroimage 83, 569-580. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.076
64. Peterchev, A. V., Wagner, T. A., Miranda, P. C., Nitsche, M. A., Paulus, W., Lisanby, S. H., et al. (2012). Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices. Brain Stimul. 5, 435-453. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.001
65. Peters, M. A. K., Thompson, B., Merabet, L. B., Wu, A. D., and Shams, L. (2013). Anodal tDCS to V1 blocks visual perceptual learning consolidation. Neuropsychologia 51, 1234-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.013
66. Pirulli, C., Fertonani, A., and Miniussi, C. (2014). Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level? Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:226. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00226
67. Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A., and Paulus, W. (2007). Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res. Bull. 72, 208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004
68. Prins, N., and Kingdom, F. A. A. (2009). Palamedes: Matlab Routines for Analyzing Psychophysical Data. Available at: http://www.palamedestoolbox.org/
69. Radman, T., Ramos, R. L., Brumberg, J. C., and Bikson, M. (2009). Role of cortical cell type and morphology in sub-and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2, 215-228. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.007
70. Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., et al. (2013). Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J. Physiol. 591, 2563-2578. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171
71. Reato, D., Rahman, A., Bikson, M., and Parra, L. C. (2010). Low-intensity electrical stimulation affects network dynamics by modulating population rate and spike timing. J. Neurosci. 30, 15067-15079. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2059-10.2010
72. Rosa, M. G. P., Casagrande, V. A., Preuss, T., and Kaas, J. H. (1997a). Visual field representation in striate and prestriate cortices of a prosimian primate (Galago garnetti). J. Neurophysiol. 77, 3193-3217.
73. Rosa, M. G. P., Fritsches, K. A., and Elston, G. N. (1997b). The second visual area in the marmoset monkey: visuotopic organisation, magnification factors, architectonical boundaries, and modularity. J. Comp. Neurol. 387, 547-567. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971103)387:4<547::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-2
74. Rose, D., and Blakemore, C. (1974). Effects of bicuculline on functions of inhibition in visual cortex. Nature 249, 375-377. doi: 10.1038/249375a0
75. Rushton, W. A. H. (1927). THe effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve. J. Physiol. 63, 357-377. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1927.sp002409
76. Russo, R., Wallace, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., and Cooper, N. R. (2013). Perception of comfort during active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation: a double blind study. Brain Stimul. 6, 946-951. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.05.009
77. Shipp, S. (2005). The importance of being agranular: a comparative account of visual and motor cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360, 797-814. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1630
78. Shipp, S. (2007). Structure and function of the cerebral cortex. Curr. Biol. 17, 443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.044
79. Sowden, P. T., Rose, D., and Davies, I. R. L. (2002). Perceptual learning of luminance contrast detection: specific for spatial frequency and retinal location but not orientation. Vision Res. 42, 1249-1258. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00019-6
80. Spiegel, D. P., Byblow, W. D., Hess, R. F., and Thompson, B. (2013). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation transiently improves contrast sensitivity and normalizes visual cortex activation in individuals with amblyopia. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 27, 760-769. doi: 10.1177/1545968313491006
81. Spiegel, D. P., Hansen, B. C., Byblow, W. D., and Thompson, B. (2012). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces psychophysically measured surround suppression in the human visual cortex. PLoS ONE 7:e36220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036220
82. Stagg, C. J., Best, J. G., Stephenson, M. C., O'Shea, J., Wylezinska, M., Kincses, Z. T., et al. (2009). Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation. J. Neurosci. 29, 5202-5206. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-08.2009
83. Stagg, C. J., and Nitsche, M. A. (2011). Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Neuroscientist 17, 37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614
84. Tootell, R. B., Silverman, M. S., and De Valois, R. L. (1981). Spatial frequency columns in primary visual cortex. Science 214, 813-815. doi: 10.1126/science.7292014
85. Tootell, R. B., Switkes, E., Silverman, M. S., and Hamilton, S. L. (1988). Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. II. Retinotopic organization. J. Neurosci. 8, 1531-1568.
86. Tyler, C. W. (1997). Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. Spat. Vis. 10, 369-377. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00294
87. Wagner, T., Fregni, F., Fecteau, S., Grodzinsky, A., Zahn, M., and Pascual-Leone, A. (2007). Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 35, 1113-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.027
88. Ward, R., and Weiskrantz, L. (1969). Impaired Discrimination Following Polarisation of the Striate Cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 356, 346-356. doi: 10.1007/BF00235243
89. Webster, M. A., and Miyahara, E. (1997). Contrast adaptation and the spatial structure of natural images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2355-2366. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.14.002355
90. Yu, H.-H. H., Verma, R., Yang, Y., Tibballs, H. A., Lui, L. L., Reser, D. H., et al. (2010). Spatial and temporal frequency tuning in striate cortex: functional uniformity and specializations related to receptive field eccentricity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 31, 1043-1062. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07118.x