A comprehensive assessment of somatic mutation detection in cancer using whole-genome sequencing

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Alioto, Tyler S ^a,b   Buchhalter, Ivo ^c   Derdak, Sophia ^a,b   Hutter, Barbara ^c   Eldridge, Matthew D ^d   Hovig, Eivind ^e,f   Heisler, Lawrence E ^g   Beck, Timothy A ^g   Simpson, Jared T ^g   Tonon, Laurie ^h   Sertier, Anne Sophie ^h   Patch, Ann Marie ^i,j   Jäger, Natalie ^c,k   Ginsbach, Philip ^c   Drews, Ruben ^c   Paramasivam, Nagarajan ^c   Kabbe, Rolf ^c   Chotewutmontri, Sasithorn ^c   Diessl, Nicolle ^c   Previti, Christopher ^c   Schmidt, Sabine ^c   Brors, Benedikt ^c   Feuerbach, Lars ^c   Heinold, Michael ^c   Gröbner, Susanne ^l   Korshunov, Andrey ^l   Tarpey, Patrick S ^m   Butler, Adam P ^m   Hinton, Jonathan ^m   Jones, David ^m   Menzies, Andrew ^m   Raine, Keiran ^m   Shepherd, Rebecca ^m   Stebbings, Lucy ^m   Teague, Jon W ^m   Ribeca, Paolo ^a,b   Giner, Francesc Castro ^a,b   Beltran, Sergi ^a,b   Raineri, Emanuele ^a,b   Dabad, Marc ^a,b   Heath, Simon C ^a,b   Gut, Marta ^a,b   Denroche, Robert E ^g   Harding, Nicholas J ^g   Yamaguchi, Takafumi N ^g   Fujimoto, Akihiro ⁿ   Nakagawa, Hidewaki ⁿ   Quesada, Víctor ^o   Valdés Mas, Rafael ^o   Nakken, Sigve ^e   Vodák, Daniel ^e   Bower, Lawrence ^d   Lynch, Andrew G ^d   Anderson, Charlotte L ^d,p   Waddell, Nicola ^i,j   Pearson, John V ^i,j   Grimmond, Sean M ^i,q   Peto, Myron ^r   Spellman, Paul ^r   He, Minghui ^s   Kandoth, Cyriac ^t   Lee, Semin ^u   Zhang, John ^u,v   Létourneau, Louis ^w   Ma, Singer ^x,ae   Seth, Sahil ^v   Torrents, David ^y   Xi, Liu ^z   Wheeler, David A ^z   López Otín, Carlos ^o   Campo, Elías ^aa   Campbell, Peter J ^m   Boutros, Paul C ^h,ab   Puente, Xose S ^o   Gerhard, Daniela S ^ac   Pfister, Stefan M ^c,l   McPherson, John D ^g,ab   Hudson, Thomas J ^g,ab   Schlesner, Matthias ^c   Lichter, Peter ^c   Eils, Roland ^c,ad   Jones, David T W ^c   Gut, Ivo G ^a,b   more..

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^g ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^h CENTRE LÉON BÉRARD   (France)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^j QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^k STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^m WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences   (Japan)

^o UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^p UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^q UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^r OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^s BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^t WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^u HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^v UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^w MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^x University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^y BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

^z BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^aa UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^ac NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^ae DNAnexus   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME; MODEL VALIDATION; MUTATION;

ARTICLE; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CHRONIC LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; SOMATIC MUTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN GENOME; LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA; MUTATION; PROCEDURES;

GENOME, HUMAN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA, LYMPHOID; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; MUTATION;

EID: 84949564442     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10001     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hudson, T. J. et al. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature 464, 993-998 (2010).
2. Mardis, E. R. & Wilson, R. K. Cancer genome sequencing: a review. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, R163-R168 (2009).
3. Ley, T. J. et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 2424-2433 (2010).
4. Puente, X. S. et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 475, 101-105 (2011).
5. Alkodsi, A., Louhimo, R. & Hautaniemi, S. Comparative analysis of methods for identifying somatic copy number alterations from deep sequencing data. Brief Bioinform. 16, 242-254 (2014).
6. Dewey, F. E. et al. Clinical interpretation and implications of whole-genome sequencing. JAMA 311, 1035-1045 (2014).
7. Kandoth, C. et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502, 333-339 (2013).
8. Jones, D. T. et al. Dissecting the genomic complexity underlying medulloblastoma. Nature 488, 100-105 (2012).
9. Cancer Genome Atlas Research, N. Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 2059-2074 (2013).
10. Li, H. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 30, 2843-2851 (2014).
11. McGinn, S. & Gut, I. G. DNA sequencing-spanning the generations. N. Biotechnol. 30, 366-372 (2013).
12. Xu, H., Di Carlo, J., Satya, R. V., Peng, Q. & Wang, Y. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data. BMC Genomics 15, 244 (2014).
13. Highnam, G. et al. An analytical framework for optimizing variant discovery from personal genomes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6275 (2015).
14. Zook, J. M. et al. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 246-251 (2014).
15. Pabinger, S. et al. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Brief Bioinform. 15, 256-278 (2014).
16. Fang, H. et al. Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data. Genome Med. 6, 89 (2014).
17. O'Rawe, J. et al. Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med. 5, 28 (2013).
18. Wang, Q. et al. Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers. Genome Med. 5, 91 (2013).
19. Kim, S. Y. & Speed, T. P. Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 189 (2013).
20. Louis, D. N. et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114, 97-109 (2007).
21. Taylor, M. D. et al. Molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma: the current consensus. Acta Neuropathol. 123, 465-472 (2012).
22. Ewing, A. D. et al. Combining tumor genome simulation with crowdsourcing to benchmark somatic single-nucleotide-variant detection. Nat. Methods 12, 623-630 (2015).
23. Kassahn, K. S. et al. Somatic point mutation calling in low cellularity tumors. PLoS ONE 8, e74380 (2013).
24. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a Map Reduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303 (2010).
25. Simpson, J. T. & Durbin, R. Efficient construction of an assembly string graph using the FM-index. Bioinformatics 26, i367-i373 (2010).
26. Garrison, E. & Marth, G. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. Preprint at arXiv:1207.3907 (2012).
27. Saunders, C. T. et al. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics 28, 1811-1817 (2012).
28. Rimmer, A. et al. Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications. Nat. Genet. 46, 912-918 (2014).
29. Challis, D. et al. An integrative variant analysis suite for whole exome next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 8 (2012).
30. Moncunill, V. et al. Comprehensive characterization of complex structural variations in cancer by directly comparing genome sequence reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1106-1112 (2014).
31. Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213-219 (2013).
32. Goode, D. L. et al. A simple consensus approach improves somatic mutation prediction accuracy. Genome Med. 5, 90 (2013).
33. Rieber, N. et al. Coverage bias and sensitivity of variant calling for four whole-genome sequencing technologies. PLoS ONE 8, e66621 (2013).
34. Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415-421 (2013).
35. Alexandrov, L. B., Nik-Zainal, S., Wedge, D. C., Campbell, P. J. & Stratton, M. R. Deciphering signatures of mutational processes operative in human cancer. Cell Rep. 3, 246-259 (2013).
36. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
37. Marco-Sola, S., Sammeth, M., Guigo, R. & Ribeca, P. The GEM mapper: fast, accurate and versatile alignment by filtration. Nat. Methods 9, 1185-1188 (2012).
38. Raineri, E., Dabad, M. & Heath, S. A note on exact differences between beta distributions in genomic (Methylation) studies. PLoS ONE 9, e97349 (2014).
39. Benson, G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 573-580 (1999).
40. Derrien, T. et al. Fast computation and applications of genome mappability. PLoS ONE 7, e30377 (2012).