Hamiltonian Systems and Optimal Control in Computational Anatomy: 100 Years since D'Arcy Thompson

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 17, Issue , 2015, Pages 447-509

  Miller, Michael I ^a,b   Trouvé, Alain ^c   Younes, Laurent ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

Brain mapping; Diffeomorphisms; Medical imaging; Shape

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; GEODESY; MAPPING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

COMPUTATIONAL ANATOMY; DIFFEOMORPHIC FLOWS; DIFFEOMORPHISMS; FUNCTIONAL INFORMATION; HAMILTONIAN CONTROLS; HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS; PARAMETRIC COORDINATES; SHAPE;

HAMILTONIANS;

ANATOMY; COMPUTATIONAL ANATOMY; CONTROL SYSTEM; FLOW; HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ANATOMIC MODEL; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BRAIN; HEART VENTRICLE; MATHEMATICAL PHENOMENA; METAMORPHOSIS; NEUROIMAGING; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANATOMY; ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; METAMORPHOSIS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEUROIMAGING;

EID: 84949519073     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: 15454274     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040601     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. Trouvé A. 1995. An approach of pattern recognition through infinite dimensional group action. Rep. LMENS-95-9, Lab. Math. l'Ecole Norm. Superieure, Paris
2. Christensen G,MillerMI, Rabbit RD. 1995. Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 5(10):1435-47
3. GrenanderU,MillerMI. 1998. Computational anatomy: An emerging discipline. Q. Appl.Math. 56:617-94
4. Dupuis P, Grenander U, Miller MI. 1998. Variation problems on flows of diffeomorphisms for image matching. Q. Appl. Math. 56:587-600
5. Miller MI, Younes L. 2001. Group actions, homeomorphisms, and matching: A general framework. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 41:61-84
6. Toga A, Thompson PM. 2001. Maps of the brain. Anat. Rec. 265:37-53
7. Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2002. On the metrics and Euler-Lagrange equations of computational anatomy. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 4:375-405
8. Thompson PM, Toga AW. 2002. A framework for computational anatomy. Comput. Vis. Sci. 5:13-34
9. MillerMI. 2004. Computational anatomy: shape, growth, and atrophy comparison via diffeomorphisms. NeuroImage 29(Suppl. 1):S19-33
10. Joshi S,Davis B, Jomier M, GerigG. 2004. Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy. NeuroImage 23(Suppl. 1):S151-60
11. Csernansky JG, Wang L, Joshi SC, Ratnanather JT, Miller MI. 2004. Computational anatomy and neuropsychiatric disease: probabilistic assessment of variation and statistical inference of group difference, hemispheric asymmetry, and time-dependent change. NeuroImage 23(Suppl. 1):S56-68
12. Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2007. Computational anatomy. In Statistical ParametricMapping: The Analysis of Functional Brain Images, ed. KJ Friston, JT Ashburner, SJ Kiebel, TE Nichols, WD Penny, pp. 49-100. London: Academic
13. Grenander U, Miller MI. 2007. Pattern Theory: From Representation to Inference. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Thompson P, Ayache N. 2008. Inferring brain variability from diffeomorphic deformations of currents: An integrative approach. Med. Image Anal. 12:626-37
15. Ashburner J. 2009. Computational anatomy with the SPM software. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27(8):1163-74
16. Younes L. 2010. Shapes and Diffeomorphisms. Appl.Math. Sci. 171. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 438 pp.
17. Pennec X. 2009. Statistical computing on manifolds: From Riemannian geometry to computational anatomy. In Emerging Trends in Visual Computing, ed. F Nielsen, pp. 347-86. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 5416. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
18. Adams RA, Stephan KE, Brown HR, Frith CD, Friston KJ. 2013. The computational anatomy of psychosis. Front. Psychiatry 4:47
19. Draganski B, Kherif F, Lutti A. 2014. Computational anatomy for studying use-dependant brain plasticity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:380
20. Reivich M, Bajcsy R, Lieberson R. 1983. A computerized system for the elastic matching of deformed radiographic images to idealized atlas images. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 7(4):618-25
21. Gee JC, Reivich M, Bajcsy R. 1993. Elastically deforming a three-dimensional atlas to match anatomical brain images. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 17:225-36
22. Amit Y, Grenander U, Piccioni M. 1991. Structural image restoration through deformable templates. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86:376-87
23. Grenander U, Chow Y, Keenan DM. 1990. Hands: A Pattern Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes. Res. Notes Neural Comput. 2. New York: Springer
24. Bookstein FL. 1989. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11.6:567-85
25. Haller JW, Banerjee A, Christensen GE, Gado M, Joshi S. 1997. Three-dimensional hippocampal MR morphometry with high-dimensional transformation of neuroanatomic atlas. Radiology 202:504-10
26. Piccioni M, Scarlatti S, Trouvé A. 1998. A variational problem arising from speech recognition. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 58(3):753-71
27. Davatzikos C, Karacali B. 2004. Estimating topology preserving and smooth displacement fields. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(7):868-80
28. Joshi SC, Miller MI. 2000. Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9(8):1357-70
29. Camion V, Younes L. 2001. Geodesic interpolating splines. In Energy MinimizationMethods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, ed.MATFigueiredo, J Zerubia, AK Jain, pp. 513-27. Lect.Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 2134. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
30. Glaunès J, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2004. Diffeomorphic matching of distributions: A new approach for unlabelled point-sets and sub-manifolds matching. Proc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., June 27-July 2, Washington, DC, pp. II-712-18. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
31. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2005. Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 61(2):139-57
32. VaillantM, Glaunès J. 2005. Surface matching via currents. In Information Processing in Medical Imaging, ed. GE Christensen, M Sonka, pp. 381-92. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 3565. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
33. MillerMI, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2006. Geodesic shooting for computational anatomy. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 24:209-28
34. Glaunès J, Qiu A,MillerMI, Younes L. 2008. Large deformation diffeomorphic metric curve matching. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 80(3):317-36
35. Ceritoglu C,Wang L, Selemon LD, Csernansky JG, MillerMI, Ratnanather JT. 2010. Large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping registration of reconstructed 3D histological section images and in vivo MR images. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4:43
36. Risser L, Vialard FX, Wolz R, Murgasova M, Holm DD, et al. 2011. Simultaneous multi-scale registration using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(10):1746-59
37. Sommer S, Nielsen M, Lauze F, Pennec X. 2011. A multi-scale kernel bundle for LDDMM: towards sparse deformation description across space and scales. Inf. Process. Med. Imaging 22:624-35
38. Tward DJ, Ceritoglu C, Kolasny A, Sturgeon GM, Segars WP, et al. 2011. Patient specific dosimetry phantoms using multichannel LDDMM of the whole body. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2011:481064
39. Du J, Younes L, Qiu A. 2011. Whole brain diffeomorphic metric mapping via integration of sulcal and gyral curves, cortical surfaces, and images. NeuroImage 56(1):162-73
40. Vadakkumpadan F, Arevalo H, Ceritoglu C, Miller M, Trayanova N. 2012. Image-based estimation of ventricular fiber orientations for personalized modeling of cardiac electrophysiology. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31(5):1051-60
41. Du J, Hosseinbor AP, Chung MK, Bendlin BB, Suryawanshi G, et al. 2014. Diffeomorphic metric mapping and probabilistic atlas generation of hybrid diffusion imaging based on BFOR signal basis. Med. Image Anal. 18(7):1002-14
42. Schmah T, Risser L, Vialard F-X. 2013. Left-invariantmetrics for diffeomorphic image registration with spatially-varying regularisation. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 16(Part 1):203-10
43. Tang X, Oishi K, Faria AV, Hillis AE, Albert MS, et al. 2013. Bayesian parameter estimation and segmentation in the multi-Atlas random orbit model. PLOS ONE 8(6):e65591
44. Tward DJ, Ma J, MillerMI, Younes L. 2013. Robust diffeomorphic mapping via geodesically controlled active shapes. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2013:205494
45. Khan AR, Wang L, Beg MF. 2013. Multistructure large deformation diffeomorphic brain registration. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(2):544-53
46. Singh N, Fletcher PT, Preston JS, King RD, Marron JS, et al. 2014. Quantifying anatomical shape variations in neurological disorders. Med. Image Anal. 18(3):616-33
47. Avants B, Gee JC. 2004. Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation. NeuroImage 23(Suppl. 1):S139-50
48. Beg MF, Khan A. 2007. Symmetric data attachment terms for large deformation image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(9):1179-89
49. Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. 2008. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med. Image Anal. 12(1):26-41
50. VercauterenT, PennecX, Perchant A, AyacheN. 2009. Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration. NeuroImage 45(1, Suppl. 1):S61-72
51. Hernandez M, Bossa MN, Olmos S. 2009. Registration of anatomical images using paths of diffeomorphisms parameterized with stationary vector field flows. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 85(3):291-306
52. Hernandez M, Olmos S, Pennec X. 2008. Comparing algorithms for diffeomorphic registration: stationary LDDMMand diffeomorphic Demons. Proc. 2nd MICCAIWorkshop Math. Found. Comput. Anat., Sept. 6-10, New York, pp. 24-35. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
53. Sotiras A,Davatzikos C, Paragios N. 2013. Deformable medical image registration: A survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 32(7):1153-90
54. Thompson DW. 1992 (1917). On Growth and Form: The Complete Revised Edition. New York: Dover
55. Grenander U. 1994. General Pattern Theory: A Mathematical Study of Regular Structures. Oxford Math. Monogr. Oxford, UK: Clarendon/Oxford Univ. Press
56. Lang S. 1962. Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds. London/New York:Wiley Intersci. 1st. ed.
57. Abraham RH, Smale S. 1963. Lectures of Smale on Differential Topology. New York: Columbia Univ.
58. Palais RS. 1968. Foundations of Global Non-Linear Analysis. New York:W.A. Benjamin
59. Ebin D. 1970. The manifold of Riemannian metrics. Proc. Symp. AMS 15:11-40
60. Ebin DG, Marsden JE. 1970. Groups of diffeomorphisms and the motion of an incompressible fluid. Ann. Math. 92:102-63
61. Misioek G, Preston SC. 2010. Fredholm properties of Riemannian exponential maps on diffeomorphism groups. Invent. Math. 179(1):191-227
62. Inci H, Kappeler T, Topalov P. 2013. On the Regularity of the Composition of Diffeomorphisms. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. Vol. 226, No. 1062. Providence, RI: Am. Math. Soc.
63. Arnold VI. 1966. Sur un principe variationnel pour les ecoulements stationnaires des liquides parfaits et ses applications aux problèmes de stabilité non linéaires. J. Méc. 5:29-43
64. Arnold VI. 1989. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. New York: Springer. 2nd ed.
65. Marsden JE. 1992. Lectures on Geometric Mechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
66. Camassa R, Holm DD. 1993. An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71:1661-64
67. Holm DD, Marsden JE, Ratiu TS. 1998. The Euler-Poincaré equations and semidirect products with applications to continuum theories. Adv. Math. 137:1-81
68. Holm DD. 2008. Geometric Mechanics. London: Imperial College Press
69. Mumford D, Michor PW. 2013. On Euler's equation and 'EPDiff.' J. Geom. Mech. 5(3):319-44
70. Michor PW, Mumford D. 2013. A zoo of diffeomorphism groups on Rn. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 44(4):529-40
71. Michor PW, Mumford D. 2007. An overview of the Riemannian metrics on spaces of curves using the Hamiltonian approach. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 23(1):74-113
72. MicheliM,Michor PW, Mumford D. 2013. Sobolev metrics on diffeomorphism groups and the derived geometry of spaces of submanifolds. Izvestiya: Math. 77(3):541-570
73. Kurtek S, Klassen E, Gore JC, Zhaohua D, Srivastava A. 2012. Elastic geodesic paths in shape space of parameterized surfaces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 34(9):1717-30
74. BauerM, Bruveris M, MichorPW.2014. Overview of the geometries of shape spaces and diffeomorphism groups. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 50(1-2):60-97
75. Bruveris M. 2014. Completeness properties of Sobolev metrics on the space of curves. arXiv:1407.0601 [math.DG]
76. MillerMI, Younes L, Trouvé A. 2014. Diffeomorphometry and geodesic positioning systems for human anatomy. Technology 2(1):36
77. Bassingthwaighte JB. 2000. Strategies for the physiome project. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28(8):1043-58
78. Trouvé A. 1995. Action de groupe de dimension infinie et reconnaissance de formes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 321(8):1031-34
79. Miller MI, Qiu A. 2009. The emerging discipline of Computational Functional Anatomy. NeuroImage 45(Suppl. 1):S16-39
80. Young AA, Cowan BR, Thrupp SF, HedleyWJ, Dell'Italia LJ. 2000. Left ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide-point modeling on MR images. Radiology 216(2):597-602
81. Qiu A, Adler M, Crocetti D, Miller MI, Mostofsky SH. 2010. Basal ganglia shapes predict social, communication, and motor dysfunctions in boys with autism spectrum disorder. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 49(6):539-51
82. Qiu A, Fennema-Notestine C, Dale AM, Miller MI, Alzheimer's Dis. Neuroimaging Initiat. 2009. Regional shape abnormalities inmild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage 45(3):656-61
83. Ardekani S, Weiss RG, Lardo AC, George RT, Lima JA, et al. 2009. Computationalmethod for identifying and quantifying shape features of human left ventricular remodeling. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 37(6):1043-54
84. Ardekani S, Jain A, Jain S, Abraham TP, AbrahamMR, et al. 2012. Matching sparse sets of cardiac image cross-sections using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping algorithm. In Statistical Atlases and ComputationalModels of the Heart: Imaging andModelling Challenges, ed.OCamara, E Konukoglu,MPop, K Rhode,MSermesant, A Young, pp. 234-43. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 7085. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer
85. Younes L, Ratnanather JT, Brown T, Aylward E, Nopoulos P, et al. 2012. Regionally selective atrophy of subcortical structures in prodromal HD as revealed by statistical shape analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(3):792-809
86. Li X, Samei E,Williams CH, Segars WP, Tward DJ, et al. 2012. Effects of protocol and obesity on dose conversion factors in adult body CT. Med. Phys. 39(11):6550-71
87. Segars WP, Bond J, Frush J, Hon S, Eckersley C, et al. 2013. Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization. Med. Phys. 40(4):043701
88. Vaillant M, Miller MI, Younes L, Trouvé A. 2004. Statistics on diffeomorphisms via tangent space representations. NeuroImage 23(Suppl. 1):S161-69
89. Glaunès J, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2006. Modeling planar shape variation via Hamiltonian flows of curves. In Statistics and Analysis of Shapes, ed. H Krim, A Yezzi Jr, pp. 335-61. Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol. Boston: Birkhauser
90. Azencott R, Glowinski R, He J, Hoppe RHW, Jajoo A, et al. 2010. Optimal diffeomorphic matching in biomedical image processing.Work. Pap. 14/2010, Inst. Math., Univ. Augsburg, Ger.
91. TrouvéA,Younes L. 2011. Shape spaces. In Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging, ed.OSchertzer, pp. 1309-62. New York: Springer
92. Hoppe RHW. 2011. Optimal diffeomorphic matching in biomedical image processing. Presented at Workshop on Optimal Control in Image Processing, May 31-June 1, 2010, Heidelberg, Ger.
93. Vialard F-X, Risser L, Rueckert D, Cotter CJ. 2012. Diffeomorphic 3D image registration via geodesic shooting using an efficient adjoint calculation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 97(2):229-41
94. Trouvé A, Vialard F-X. 2012. Shape splines and stochastic shape evolutions: A second order point of view. Q. Appl. Math. 70(2):219-51
95. Ashburner J. 2007. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage 38(1):95-113
96. Oishi K, Faria A, Jiang H, Li X, Akhter K, et al. 2009. Atlas-based whole brain white matter analysis using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping: Application to normal elderly and Alzheimer's disease participants. NeuroImage 46(2):486-99
97. Risser L, Vialard FX, Wolz R, Holm DD, Rueckert D. 2010. Simultaneous fine and coarse diffeomorphic registration: Application to atrophy measurement in Alzheimer's disease. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 13(Part 2):610-17
98. Günther A, Lamecker H, Weiser M. 2013. Flexible shapematching with finite element based LDDMM. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 105(2):128-43
99. Seo D, Ho J, Vemuri BC. 2013. Computing diffeomorphic paths for large motion interpolation. Proc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., June 23-28, Portland, Ore., pp. 1227-32. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
100. Zolfaghari R, Epain N, Jin CT, Glaunès J, Tew A. 2014. Large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping and fast-multipole boundary element method provide new insights for binaural acoustics. arXiv:1401.7100v1 [cs.CG]
101. Ceritoglu C, Oishi K, Li X, Chou MC, Younes L, et al. 2009. Multi-contrast large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping for diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage 47(2):618-27
102. Thirion J-P. 1998. Image matching as a diffusion process: An analogy with Maxwell's demons. Med. Image Anal. 2(3):243-60
103. ChristensenGE, Johnson HJ. 2001. Consistent image registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(7):568-82
104. Ma J, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2008. Bayesian template estimation in computational anatomy. NeuroImage 42(1):252-61
105. Ma J, Miller MI, Younes L. 2010. A Bayesian generative model for surface template estimation. Int. J. Biomed. Imaging 2010:974957
106. Mori S, Oishi K, Faria AV, Miller MI. 2013. Atlas-based neuroinformatics via MRI: harnessing information from past clinical cases and quantitative image analysis for patient care. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 15:71-92
107. Miller MI, Faria AV, Oishi K, Mori S. 2013. High-throughput neuro-imaging informatics. Front. Neuroinform. 7:31
108. Cao Y, Miller MI, Winslow RL, Younes L. 2005. Large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping of fiber orientations. Proc. Tenth Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV 2005), Oct. 17-21, Beijing, pp. 1379-86. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
109. Alexander DC, Gee JC, Bajcsy R. 1999. Strategies for data reorientation during non-rigid warps of diffusion tensor images. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI'99, ed. C Taylor, A Colchester, pp. 463-72. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 1679. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
110. Cao Y, Miller MI, Mori S, Winslow RL, Younes L. 2006. Diffeomorphic matching of diffusion tensor images. Proc. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Workshop, June 17-22, New York, NY, p. 67. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
111. Hsu YC, Hsu CH, Tseng WY. 2012. A large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping solution for diffusion spectrum imaging datasets. NeuroImage 63(2):818-34
112. Van Essen DC, Drury HA. 1989. Structural and functional analyses of human cerebral cortex using a machine-based atlas. J. Neurosci. 17:7079-102
113. Van Essen DC, Lewis JW, Drury HA, Hadjikhani N, Tootell RB, et al. 2001. Mapping visual cortex in monkeys and humans using surface-based atlases. Vis. Res. 41(10-11):1359-78
114. Van EssenDC, DruryHA, Dickson J,Harwell J, Hanlon D, Anderson CH. 2001. An integrated software suite for surface-based analyses of cerebral cortex. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8(5):443-59
115. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Tootell RB, Dale AM. 1999. High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8(4):272-84
116. Fischl B, Dale AM. 2000. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. PNAS 97(20):11050-55
117. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, et al. 2006. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31(3):968-80
118. Csernansky JG, Joshi S, Wang L, Haller JW, Gado M, et al. 1998. Hippocampal morphometry in schizophrenia by high dimensional brain mapping. PNAS 95(19):11406-11
119. Csernansky JG, et al. 2004. Abnormalities of thalamic volume and shape in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 161.5:896-902
120. Mémoli F, Sapiro G, Thompson P. 2004. Implicit brain imaging. NeuroImage 23(Suppl. 1):S179-88
121. Csernansky JG, Wang L, Swank J, Miller JP, Gado M, et al. 2005. Preclinical detection of Alzheimer's disease: hippocampal shape and volume predict dementia onset in the elderly. NeuroImage 25(3):783-92
122. Vaillant M, Qiu A, Glaunès J, Miller MI. 2007. Diffeomorphic metric surface mapping in subregion of the superior temporal gyrus. NeuroImage 34(3):1149-59
123. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CE. 2008. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science 319(5870):1640-42
124. Qiu A, Miller MI. 2008. Multi-structure network shape analysis via normal surface momentum maps. NeuroImage 42(4):1430-38
125. Miller MI, Younes L, Ratnanather JT, Brown T, Trinh H, et al. 2013. The diffeomorphometry of temporal lobe structures in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage Clin. 3:352-60
126. Tang X, HollandD,Dale AM, Younes L, MillerMI, Alzheimer'sDis.Neuroimaging Initiat. 2014. Shape abnormalities of subcortical and ventricular structures in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: detecting, quantifying, and predicting. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35(8):3701-25
127. Remme E, Young AA, Augenstein KF, Cowan B, Hunter PJ. 2004. Extraction and quantification of left ventricular deformation modes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(11):1923-31
128. Helm PA, Younes L, Beg MF, Ennis DB, Leclercq C, et al. 2006. Evidence of structural remodeling in the dyssynchronous failing heart. Circ. Res. 98(1):125-32
129. Young AA, Frangi AF. 2009. Computational cardiac atlases: from patient to population and back. Exp. Physiol. 94(5):578-96
130. Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N. 2007. Measuring brain variability via sulcal lines registration: A diffeomorphic approach. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 10(Part 1):675-82
131. Durrleman S, Fillard P, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N. 2011. Registration, atlas estimation and variability analysis of white matter fiber bundles modeled as currents. NeuroImage 55(3):1073-90
132. Charon N, Trouvé A. 2013. The varifold representation of nonoriented shapes for diffeomorphic registration. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 6(4):2547-80
133. Hamm J, Lee D. 2008. Grassmann discriminant analysis: A unifying view on subspace-based learning. Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., July 5-9, Helsinki, Finl., pp. 376-83. New York: Assoc. Comput.Mach.
134. Wolf L, Shashua A. 2003. Learning over sets using kernel principal angles. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 4:913-31
135. Charon N, Charlier B, Trouvé A. 2015. The fshape framework for the variability analysis of functional shapes. arXiv:1404.6039v1 [cs.CG]
136. Foias C, Holm DD, Titi ES. 2001. TheNavier-Stokes-Alpha model of fluid turbulence. Phys.D152:505-19
137. Arrate F, Ratnanather JT, Younes L. 2010. Diffeomorphic active contours.SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 3(2):176-98
138. Staneva V, Younes L. 2014. Modeling and estimation of shape deformation for topology-preserving object tracking. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 7(1):427-55
139. Durrleman S, Allassonnière S, Joshi S. 2013. Sparse adaptive parameterization of variability in image ensembles. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 101(1):161-83
140. Younes L. 2012. Constrained diffeomorphic shape evolution. Found. Comput. Math. 12(3):295-325
141. Younes L. 2014. Gaussian diffeons for surface and image matching within a Lagrangian framework. Geom. Imaging Comput. 1(1):141-71
142. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, et al. 2002. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105(4):539-42
143. Steinert-Threlkeld S, Ardekani S, Mejino JL, Detwiler LT, Brinkley JF, et al. 2012. Ontological labels for automated location of anatomical shape differences. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(3):522-27
144. Hung J, Francois C, Nelson NA, Young A, Cowan BR, et al. 2009. Cardiac image modeling tool for quantitative analysis of global and regional cardiac wall motion. Investig. Radiol. 44(5):271-78
145. Arguillère S, Trélat E, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2014. Shape deformation analysis from the optimal control viewpoint. arXiv:1401.0661 [math.OC]
146. Arguillère S,Trélat E. 2014. Sub-Riemannian structures on groups of diffeomorphisms. arXiv:1409.8378 [math.OC]
147. Trouvé A, Younes L. 2005. Metamorphoses through lie group action. Found. Comput. Math. 5(2):173-98
148. Lian NX,Davatzikos C. 2011. Morphological appearance manifolds for group-wise morphometric analysis. Med. Image Anal. 6:814-29
149. Trouvé A, Younes L. 2005. Local geometry of deformable templates. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 37(1):17-59
150. Garcin L, Younes L. 2005. Geodesic image matching: A wavelet based energy minimization scheme. In Energy MinimizationMethods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, ed. A Rangarajan, B Vemuri, AL Yuille, pp. 349-64. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 3757. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
151. Garcin L, Younes L. 2006. Geodesic matching with free extremities. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 25(3):329-40
152. Holm DD, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2009. The Euler-Poincare theory of metamorphosis. Q. Appl. Math. 67:661-85
153. Bruveris M, Gay-Balmaz F, Holm DD, Ratiu TS. 2011. The momentum map representation of images. J. Nonlinear Sci. 21(1):115-50
154. Richardson CL, Younes L. 2014. Metamorphosis of images in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. arXiv:1409.6573 [math.OC]
155. Richardson CL, Younes L. 2013. Computingmetamorphoses between discrete measures. J. Geom.Mech. 5(1):131-50
156. Allassonnière S, Trouvé A, Younes L. 2005. Geodesic shooting and diffeomorphicmatching via textured meshes. In Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, ed. A Rangarajan, B Vemuri, AL Yuille, pp. 365-81. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 3757. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
157. Niethammer M, Huang Y, Vialard F-X. 2011. Geodesic regression for image time-series. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 14(Part 2):655-62
158. Qiu A, Younes L, Miller MI. 2012. Principal component based diffeomorphic surface mapping. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31(2):302-11
159. Fletcher PT. 2012. Geodesic regression and the theory of least squares on Riemannian manifolds. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 105:171-85
160. Hinkle J, SzegediM,Wang B, Salter B, Joshi S. 2012. 4D CT image reconstruction with diffeomorphic motion model. Med. Image Anal. 16(6):1307-16