Geodesic regression and the theory of least squares on riemannian manifolds

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 171-185

  Thomas Fletcher, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Geodesic regression; Manifold statistics; Shape analysis

Indexed keywords

EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS; GEODESIC REGRESSION; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; LEAST-SQUARES ESTIMATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CRITERIA; NON-PARAMETRIC PERMUTATION; RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD; SHAPE ANALYSIS;

GEOMETRY; MEDICAL IMAGING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

GEODESY;

EID: 84883202912     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-012-0591-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bookstein, F. L. (1986). Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions (with discussion). Statistical Science, 1(2), 181-242.
2. Boothby, W. M. (1986). An introduction to differentiable manifolds and Riemannian geometry (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
3. do Carmo, M. (1992). Riemannian geometry. Boston: Birkhäuser.
4. Davis, B.; Fletcher, P. T.; Bullitt, E.; Joshi, S. (2007). Population shape regression from random design data. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision. Rio de Janeiro: IEEE.
5. Driesen, N.; Raz, N. (1995). The influence of sex, age, and handedness on corpus callosum morphology: A meta-analysis. Psychobiology, 23(3), 240-247.
6. Dryden, I.; Mardia, K. (1998). Statistical shape analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
7. Durrleman, S.; Pennec, X.; Trouvé, A.; Gerig, G.; Ayache, N. (2009). Spatiotemporal atlas estimation for developmental delay detection in longitudinal datasets (pp. 297-304). In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted Intervention intervention. Heidelberg: Springer.
8. Fletcher, P. T. (2011). Geodesic regression on Riemannian manifolds (pp. 75-86). In: MICCAI workshop on mathematical foundations of computational anatomy. Toronto: MFCA.
9. Fletcher, P. T.; Lu, C.; Joshi, S. (2003). Statistics of shape via principal geodesic analysis on lie groups (pp. 95-101). In: IEEE CVPR. Madison: IEEE.
10. Fréchet, M. (1948). Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancié. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, 10(3), 215-310.
11. Grenander, U. (1963). Probabilities on algebraic structures. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Helgason, S. (1978). Differential geometry, lie groups, and symmetric spaces. New York: Academic Press.
13. Hinkle, J.; Fletcher, P. T.; Muralidharan, P.; Joshi, S.; (2012). Polynomial regression on Riemannian manifolds. In: European conference on computer vision. Florence: ECCV.
14. Huckemann, S.; Hotz, T.; Munk, A. (2010). Intrinsic shape analysis: Geodesic principal component analysis for Riemannian manifolds modulo lie group actions. Statistica Sinica, 20, 1-100.
15. Jupp, P. E.; Kent, J. T. (1987). Fitting smooth paths to spherical data. Applied Statistics, 36(1), 34-46.
16. Karcher, H. (1977). Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. Communication on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 30, 509-541.
17. Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics, and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16, 18-121.
18. Kendall, W. S. (1990). Probability, convexity, and harmonic maps with small image I: Uniqueness and fine existence. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 3(61), 371-406.
19. Kenobi, K.; Dryden, I. L.; Le, H. (2010). Shape curves and geodesic modelling. Biometrika, 97(3), 567-584.
20. Klassen, E.; Srivastava, A.; Mio, W.; Joshi, S. (2004). Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces. IEEE PAMI, 26(3), 372-383.
21. Kume, A.; Dryden, I. L.; Le, H. (2007). Shape-space smoothing splines for planar landmark data. Biometrika, 94(3), 513-528.
22. Mardia, K. V. (2000). Directional statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
23. Michor, P. W.; Mumford, D. (2006). Riemannian geometries on spaces of plane curves. Journal of European Mathematical Society, 8, 1-48.
24. Miller, M. (2004). Computational anatomy: Shape, growth, and atrophy comparison via diffeomorphisms. NeuroImage, 23, S19-S33. (Pubitemid 39421704)
25. Muralidharan, P.; Fletcher, P. T. (2012). Sasaki metrics for analysis of longitudinal data on manifolds. In: IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Providence: CVPR.
26. Niethammer, M.; Huang, Y.; Viallard, F. X. (2011). Geodesic regression for image time-series. In: Proceedings of medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. Toronto: MICCAI.
27. Pennec, X. (2006). Intrinsic statistics on Riemannian manifolds: Basic tools for geometric measurements. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 25(1), 1-12.
28. Shi, X.; Styner, M.; Lieberman, J.; Ibrahim, J.; Lin, W.; Zhu, H. (2009). Intrinsic regression models for manifold-valued data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 5762, 192-199.
29. Sommer, S.; Lauze, F.; Nielsen, M. (2010). The differential of the exponential map, Jacobi fields and exact principal geodesic, analysis. Retrieved October 7, 2010 from arXiv:10081902v3.
30. Trouvé, A.; Vialard, F. X. (2010). A second-order model for time-dependent data interpolation: Splines on shape spaces. In: MICCAI STIA workshop. Beijing: MICCAI.
31. Younes, L. (1998). Computable elastic distances between shapes. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 58, 565-586. (Pubitemid 128496905)
32. Younes, L. (2006). Jacobi fields in groups of diffeomorphisms and applications. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. 65, 113-134.