Endurance and adaptation of community forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico

Forests

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 4295-4327

  Ellis, Edward A ^a   Kainer, Karen A ^b   Sierra Huelsz, José Antonio ^b   Negreros Castillo, Patricia ^a   Rodriguez Ward, Dawn ^c   DiGiano, Maria ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Peru)

^d Earth Innovation Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Community forestry; Ejido; Forest cover; Maya Forest; Yucat n

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON; COMMERCE; CONSERVATION; DEFORESTATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TIMBER;

ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; EJIDO; FOREST COVER; MAYA FOREST;

FORESTRY;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITY FORESTRY; DEFORESTATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; SILVICULTURE; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; TIMBER;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; QUINTANA ROO; YUCATAN PENINSULA;

EID: 84949495473     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19994907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/f6114295     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Charnley, S.; Poe, M.R. Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2007, 36, 301-336.
2. Arnold, J.E.M. Community Forestry: Ten Years in Review; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation (FAO): Rome, Italy, 1991.
3. Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI). What Rights? A Comparative Analysis of Developing Countries' National Legislation on Community and Indigenous Peoples' Forest Tenure Rights; RRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
4. Molnar, A.; France M.; Purdy, L.; Karver. J. Community-based Forest Management: The Extent and Potential Scope of Community and Smallhorder Forest Management and Enterprises; Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2011; p. 36.
5. De Jong, W.; Cornejo, C.; Pacheco, P.; Pokorny, B.; Stoian, D.; Sabogal, C.; Louman, B. Opportuniy and challenges for community forestry: Lessons from tropical America. In Forests and Society-Responding to Global Drivers of Change; Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., Alfaro, R.I., Kanninen, M., Lobovikov, M., Varjo, J., Eds.; IUFRO World Series: Vienna, Austria, 2010; Volume 25, p. 509.
6. Bray, D.B.; Merino-Pérez, L.; Negreros-Castillo, P.; Segura-Warnholtz, G.; Torres-Rojo, J.M.; Vester, H.F.M. Mexico's community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17, 672-677.
7. Porter-Bolland, L.; Ellis, E.A.; Guariguata, M.R.; Ruiz-Mallén, I.; Negrete-Yankelevich, S.; Reyes-García, V. Community managed forests and forest protected areas: An assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 268, 6-17.
8. Bray, D.B.; Merino-Peréz, L.; Barry, D. Community managed in the strong sense of the phrase: The community forest enterprises in Mexico. In The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes; Bray, D.B., Merino-Peréz, L., Barry, D., Eds.; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005; pp. 3-26.
9. Madrid, L.; Núñez, J.M.; Quiroz, G.; Rodríguez, Y. La propiedad social forestal en México. Investig. Ambient. 2009, 2, 179-196.
10. Segura, G.; Merino-Pérez, L.; Bray, D.B.; Jiménez, A.C. Manejo Forestal Comunitario en México: Un Modelo Emergente de Manejo Sustentable de Ecosistemas Forestales. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/ARTICLE/WFC/XII/0944-C1.HTM (accessed on 11 October 2012).
11. Bray, D.B. A path through the woods: 15 years of community forest management in Mexico. Grassroots Dev. 2007, 28, 40-47.
12. Klooster, D.; Ambinakudige, S. The global significance of Mexican community forestry. In The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes; Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L., Barry, D., Eds.; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005; pp. 305-334.
13. Klooster, D.; Masera, O. Community forest management in Mexico: Carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Glob. Environ. Change 2000, 10, 259-272.
14. Barsimantov, J.; Kendall, J. Community forestry, common property, and deforestation in eight Mexican states. J. Environ. Dev. 2012, 21, 414-437.
15. Durán-Medina, E.; Mas, J.E.; Velázquez, A. Cambios en las coberturas de vegetación y usos de suelo en regiones con manejo forestal comunitario y áreas naturales protegidas de México. In Los Bosques Comunitarios de México: Manejo Sustentable de Paisajes Forestales; Bray, D., Merino, L., Barry, D., Eds.; INE-SEMARNAT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007; pp. 267-299.
16. Bray, D.B.; Durán, E.M.; Merino Pérez, L.; Torres Rojo, J.M.; Velázquez, A.M. Nueva Evidencia: Los Bosques Comunitarios de México Protegen el Ambiente, Disminuyen la Pobreza y Promueven la Paz Social; Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007; p. 26.
17. Antinori, C.M.; Bray, D.B. Communities as entrepreneurial firms: Institutional and economic perspectives from Mexico. World Dev. 2005, 33, 1529-1543.
18. Bray, D.B.; Duran, E.; Ramos, V.H.; Mas, J.-F.; Velazquez, A.; McNab, R.B.; Barry, D.; Radachowsky, J. Tropical deforestation, community forests, and protected areas in the Maya Forest. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13, 56. Available online: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art56/(accessed on 22 February 2013).
19. Ellis, E.A.; Porter-Bolland, L. Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas? A comparison of land use/land cover change in two neighboring study areas of the Central Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 1971-1983.
20. Dalle, S.P.; de Blois, S.; Caballero, J.; Johns, T. Integrating analyses of local land-use regulations, cultural perceptions and land-use/land cover data for assessing the success of community-based conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 222, 370-383.
21. Bray, D.B.; Klepeis, P. Deforestation, forest transitions, and institutions for sustainability in Southeastern Mexico, 1990-2000. Environ. Hist. 2005, 11, 195-223.
22. Bray, D.B.; Ellis, E.A.; Armijo-Canto, N.; Beck, C.T. The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: A case study of the ''Mayan Zone'' in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 333-346.
23. Bray, D.B. Manejo adaptativo, organizaciones y manejo de la propiedad común: Perspectivas de los bosques comunales de Quintana Roo, México. In Uso, Conservación y Cambio en los Bosques de Quintana Roo; Armijo, N., Llorens, C., Eds.; Universidad de Quintana Roo-CONACYT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2004; pp. 56-85.
24. Stevens, C.; Winterbottom, R.; Springer, J.; Reytar, K. Securing Rights, Combating Climate Change: How Strengthening Community Forest Rights Mitigates Climate Change; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; p. 56.
25. Cronkleton, P.; Bray, D.B.; Medina, G. Community forest management and the emergence of multi-scale governance institutions: Lessons for REDD+ development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia. Forests 2011, 2, 451-473.
26. Agrawal, A.; Angelsen, A. Using community forestry management to achieve REDD+ goals. In Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options; Angelsen A., Ed.; CIFOR: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; pp. 201-211.
27. Hayes, T.; Persha, L. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest management in a REDD+ world. For. Policy Econ. 2010, 12, 545-553.
28. Nygren, A. Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras. World Dev. 2005, 33, 639-655.
29. Klooster, D.J. Toward adaptive community forest management: Integrating local forest knowledge with scientific forestry. Econ. Geogr. 2002, 78, 43-70.
30. Engle, N.L. Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2011, 21, 647-656.
31. Fisher, R.; Prabhu, R.; McDougall, C. Adaptive Collaborative Management of Community Forests in Asia: Experiences from Nepal, Indonesia and the Philippines; Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2007; p. 228.
32. Coe, M.D. The Maya, 7th ed.; Thames and Hudson, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 272.
33. Hernández, E.X. Maize and man in the greater Southwest. Econ. Bot. 1985, 39, 416-430.
34. Gómez-Pompa, A.; Klaus, A. Taming the wilderness myth. BioScience 1992, 42, 271-279.
35. Gómez-Pompa, A.; Bainbridge, D.A. Tropical forestry as if people mattered. In Tropical Forests: Management and Ecology; Lugo, A., Lowe, C., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 408-422.
36. DiGiano, M.L. Privatizing the Commons? A Political Ecology of Mexico's 1992 Agrarian Reform in Quintana Roo, Yucatan Peninsula. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2011; p.188.
37. Higuera-Bonfil, A. Quintana Roo entre Tiempos. Política, Poblamiento y Explotación Forestal 1872-1925; Universidad de Quintana Roo-Norte Sur Ed.: Chetumal, Mexico, 1997; p. 322.
38. Reed, N.A. The Caste War of the Yucatan Peninsula, Revised Edition; Stanford University Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2001; p. 448.
39. Kiernan, M.J.; Freese, C.H. Mexico's Plan Piloto Forestal: The search for balance between socioeconomic and ecological sustainability. In Harvesting Wild Species: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation; Freese, C.H., Ed.; The Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1997; pp. 93-131.
40. Santos, V.; Carreón, M.; Nelson, K.C. La Organización de la Unión de Ejidos Productores Forestales de la Zona Maya: Un Proceso de Investigación Participativa; Red de Gestión de Recursos Naturales and Rockefeller Foundation: Mexico City, Mexico, 1998; p. 129.
41. Flores, J.S.; Espejel, I. Tipos de Vegetación de la Península de Yucatán. Etnoflora Yucatanense, Fascículo 3; Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán: Mérida, Mexico, 1994; p. 35.
42. Koleff, P.; Urquiza-Haas, T.; Contreras, B. Prioridades de conservación de los bosques tropicales en México: Reflexiones sobre su estado de conservación y manejo. Ecosistemas 2012, 21, 6-20.
43. Vester, H.F.M.; Navarro-Martínez, M.A. Ecological issues in community tropical forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico. In The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes; Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L., Barry, D., Eds.; University of Texas Press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005; pp. 183-213.
44. Gutiérrez-Granados, G.; Pérez-Salicrup, D.; Dirzo, R. Differential diameter-size effects of forest management on tree species richness and community structure: Implications for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20, 1571-1585.
45. Lawrence, D.; Vester, H.; Pérez-Salicrup, D.; Eastman, R.; Turner, B.L., II; Geoghegan, J. Integrated analysis of ecosystem interactions with land-use change: The southern Yucatán Peninsular region. In Ecosystem Interactions with Land Use Change; de Freis, R., Asner, G., Eds.; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 277-292.
46. Toledo-Aceves, T.; Purata-Velarde, S.; Peters, C.M. Regeneration of commercial tree species in a logged forest in the Selva Maya, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 2481-2489.
47. Snook, L.K.; Cámara-Cabrales, L.; Kelty, M.J. Six years of fruit production by mahogany trees (Swietenia macrophylla King): Patterns of variation and implications for sustainability. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 206, 221-235.
48. Hernández-Stefanoni, L.; Pineda, J.B.; Valdes-Valadez, G. Comparing the use of indigenous knowledge with classification and ordination techniques for assessing the species composition and structure of vegetation in a tropical forest. Environ. Manag. 2006, 37, 686-702.
49. Pérez-Salicrup, D. Forest types and their implications. In Integrated Land-change Science and Tropical Deforestation in the Southern Yucatán: Final Frontiers; Turner, B.L., II, Geoghegan, J., Foster, D., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2004; pp. 63-80.
50. Valdez-Hernández, M.; Sánchez, O.; Islebe, G.A.; Snook, L.K.; Negreros-Castillo, P. Recovery and early succession after experimental disturbance in a seasonally dry tropical forest in Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 334, 331-343.
51. Bonilla-Moheno, M. Damage and recovery of forest structure and composition after two subsequent hurricanes in the Yucatan Peninsula. Caribb. J. Sci. 2012, 46, 240-248.
52. Bonilla-Moheno, M.; Holl, K.D. Direct seeding to restore tropical mature-forest species in areas of slash-and-burn agriculture. Restor. Ecol. 2010, 18, 438-445.
53. Snook, L.K. Sustaining mahogany: Research and silviculture in Mexico's community forests. Bois For. Trop. 2005, 285, 55-65.
54. Snook, L.K.; Negreros-Castillo, P. Regenerating mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) on clearings in Mexico's Maya forest: The effects of clearing method and cleaning on seedling survival and growth. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 189, 143-160.
55. Negreros-Castillo, P.; Mize, C. Effects of partial overstory removal on the natural regeneration of a tropical forest in Quintana Roo, Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 1993, 58, 259-272.
56. McGroddy, M.; Lawrence, D.; Schneider, L.; Rogan, J.; Zager, I.; Schmook, B. Damage patterns after Hurricane Dean in the southern Yucatán: Has human activity resulted more resilient forests? For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 310, 812-820.
57. Sánchez-Sánchez, O.; Islebe, G.A. Hurricane Gilbert and structural changes in a tropical forest in south-eastern Mexico. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 1999, 8, 29-38.
58. Whigham, D.F.; Olmsted, I.; Cabrera-Cano, E.; Harmon, M.E. The impact of hurricane Gilbert on trees, litterfall, and woody debris in a dry tropical forest in the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula. Biotropica 1991, 23, 434-441.
59. Navarro-Martínez, M.A. Diagnóstico del Estado Actual de Swietenia macrophylla King (Caoba) en los Bosques Manejados de Quintana Roo, México: Perspectivas para Su Manejo. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico, 2015, p. 148.
60. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Conjunto Nacional de Datos Vectoriales de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación, Escala 1:250,000; Serie IV; INEGI: Aguascalientes, Mexico, 2010.
61. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Informe de la Situación del Medio Ambiente en México. Compendio de Estadísticas Ambientales; SEMARNAT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2009.
62. Arguelles, L.A.; Armijo, N. Utilización y Conservación de los Recursos Forestales en Quintana Roo. Problemática y Perspectivas del Manejo Forestal, Chetumal; Mimeo: Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico, 1995; p. 65.
63. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation (FAO). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Main Report; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010.
64. Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano (SEDATU). En Quintana Roo, 62 por Ciento de la Tierra es Propiedad Social; Boletín No. 109; SEDATU: Mexico City, Mexico, 2012. Available online: http://www.sedatu.gob.mx/sraweb/noticias/noticias-2012/junio-2012/12428/(accessed on 29 July 2015).
65. Forero, O.A.; Redclift, M. The role of the Mexican state in the development of Chicle extraction in Yucatán, and the Continuing Importance of Coyotaje. J. Lat. Am. Stud. 2006, 38, 65-93.
66. Ellis, E.A.; Beck, C.T. Dinámica de la vegetación y uso del suelo en los bosques tropicales de la Zona Maya de Quintana Roo. In Uso, Conservación y Cambio en los Bosques de Quintana Roo; Armijo, N., Llorens, C., Eds.; Universidad de Quintana Roo: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2004; pp. 203-230.
67. Ellis, E.A.; Rodriguez-Ward, D.; Romero-Montero, J.A.; Hernández-Gómez, I.U. Evaluation and Field Survey of Timber Producing Communities for Assessing Improved Forest Management Opportunities for Community Forests in the Peninsula Yucatan and Cutzamala Early Action Site; Technical Report prepared for MREDD+; Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana: Xalapa, Mexico, 2014.
68. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010; INEGI: Aguascalientes, Mexico, 2010.
69. Bray, D.B.; Antinori, C.; Torres-Rojo, J.M. The Mexican model of community forest management: The role of Agrarian policy, forest policy and entrepreneurial organization. For. Policy Econ. 2006, 8, 470-484.
70. Taylor, P.L.; Zabin, C. Neoliberal reform and sustainable forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico: Rethinking the institutional framework of the Forestry Pilot Plan. Agric. Hum. Values 2000, 17, 141-156.
71. Taylor, P.L. Community forestry as embedded process: Two cases from Durango and Quintana Roo, Mexico. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food 2001, 9, 59-81.
72. Merino-Pérez, L. Las políticas forestales y de conservación en México y en Quintana Roo. In Uso, Conservación y Cambio en los Bosques de Quintana Roo; Armijo, N., Llorens, C., Eds.; Universidad de Quintana Roo: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2004; pp. 14-42.
73. Ellis, E.A. (Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico). Personal Communication, 2015.
74. Nolasco, A.M. El Manejo de la Caoba en Quintana Roo Mexico. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente. Recur. Nat. Ambient. 2003, 44, 19-26.
75. Pérez-Cortés V.J. Diagnóstico Tecnológico de la Industria de la Madera en Quintana Roo y Estrategias para Su Desarrollo. Bachelor's Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Texcoco, México, 2012; p. 123.
76. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Forestal 2013; SEMARNAT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2014.
77. Silva-Guzmán, J.A. Diagnóstico de la Industria Forestal de Transformación Primaria del Sureste Mexicano; Proyecto ITTO PD 385/05 Rev.4 (I, F); ITTO-Universidad de Guadalajara-CONAFOR: Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 2011.
78. Bray, D.B. Community forestry as a strategy for sustainable management: Perspectives from Quintana Roo, Mexico. In Working Forests in the American Tropics; Zarin, D., Alavalapati, J., Putz, F.E., Schmink, M.C., Eds.; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 221-237.
79. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Informe 2015 Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable; Internal Report; SEMARNAT: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2015.
80. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Predios que Cuentan con Permiso de Aprovechamiento Persistente en el Estado de Quintana Roo 2006; SEMARNAT: Mexico City, Mexico, 2006.
81. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Programas Específicos de Intervención Institucional. Estrategia Nacional de Manejo Forestal para el Incremento de la Producción y Productividad 2013-2018; Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible (CCMSS): Mexico City, Mexico, 2014.
82. Arguelles, L.A.; Garcia Z.H. Lessons from trade in community forest products: Mexico. In Distinguishing Community Forest Products in the Market: Industrial Demand for a Mechanism that Brings Together Forest Certification and Fair Trade; IIED Small and Medium Forestry Enterprise Series No. 22; Macqueen, D., Dufey, A., Gomes, A.P.C., Nouer, M.R., Suárez, L.A.A., Subendranathan, V., Trujillo, Z.H.G., Vermeulen, S., de Voivodic, M.A., Wilson, E., Eds.; International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): Edinburgh, UK, 2008; pp. 45-56.
83. Forster R.; Albrect, R.; Belisle, M.; Caballero, A.; Galletti, H.; Lacayo, O.; Ortiz, S.; Robinson, D. Forest Communities and the Marketing of Lesser-Used Tropical Hardwoods in Mesoamerica; UQroo-USAID-USFS: Mexico City, Mexico, 2003; p. 145.
84. Racelis, A.E.; Barsimantov, J.A. The management of small diameter, lesser-known hardwood species as polewood in forest communities of central Quintana Roo, Mexico. J. Sustain. For. 2008, 27, 122-144.
85. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Informe 2012 Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable; Internal Report; SEMARNAT: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2013.
86. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (SEMARNAT). Informe 2013 Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable; Internal Report; SEMARNAT: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2014.
87. International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). Annual Review and Assessment of the World Timber Situation; ITTO: Yokohama, Japan, 2012.
88. Bray, D.B.; Wexler M.B. Forest policies in Mexico. In Changing Structures of Mexico: Political, Social, and Economic Prospects; Randall, L., Ed.; M.E. Sharpe: Armonk, NY, USA; London, UK, 1996; pp. 217-228.
89. Keys, E.; Roy-Chowdhury, R. Cash crops, smallholder decision-making and institutional interactions in a closing-frontier: Calakmul, Campeche, Mexico. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 2006, 5, 75-90.
90. Schmook, B.; Vance, C. Agricultural policy, market barriers, and deforestation: The case of Mexico's southern Yucatan. World Dev. 2009, 37, 1015-1025.
91. Barsimantov, J.; Racelis, A.; Barnes, G.; DiGiano, M. Tenure, tourism and timber in Quintana Roo, México: Land tenure changes in forest ejidos after agrarian reforms. Int. J. Commons 2010, 4, 293-318.
92. DiGiano, M.; Ellis, E.A.; Keys, E. Changing landscapes for forest commons: Linking land tenure with forest cover change following Mexico's 1992 counter-reforms. Hum. Ecol. 2013, 41, 707-723.
93. Nuitjen, M. Family property and the limits of intervention: The Article 27 reforms and the PROCEDE Programme in Mexico. Dev. Change 2003, 34, 475-497.
94. Haenn, N. The changing and enduring ejido: A state and regional examination of Mexico's land tenure counter reforms. Land Use Policy 2006, 23, 136-146.
95. Perramond, E.P. The rise, fall, and reconfiguration of the Mexican ejido. Geogr. Rev. 2008, 98, 356-371.
96. Antinori, C.M.; Bray, D.B. Communities as entrepreneurial firms: Institutional and economic perspectives from Mexico. World Dev. 2005, 33, 1529-1543.
97. Wilshusen, P.R. Shades of social capital: Elite persistence and the everyday politics of community forestry in southeastern Mexico. Environ. Plan. 2009, 41, 389-406.
98. Muñoz-Piña, C.; de Janvry, A.; Sadoulet, E. Recrafting rights over common property resources in Mexico. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 2003, 52, 129-158.
99. Chapela, G. Problemas y Oportunidades en el Mercado para las Empresas Sociales en México; CCMSS-Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo-USAID: Mexico City, Mexico, 2012; p. 241.
100. Torres-Rojo J.M. Informe Nacional México: Estudio y Perspectivas del Sector Forestal en América Latina, Documento de Trabajo; Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2004.
101. Carreón, V.G.; Svarch, M. El Mercado de Crédito en México; Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE): Mexico City, Mexico, 2007.
102. Mascorro, V.S.; Coops, N.C.; Kurz, W.A.; Olguín, M. Attributing changes in land cover using independent disturbance datasets: A case study of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Reg. Environ. Change 2014, doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0739-0.
103. Ejido Noh Bec. Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable y no Maderable en el Ejido Noh Bec, Municipio de Felipe Carrillo Puerto; Official Forest Management Plan; Ejido Noh Bec: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2011; p. 88.
104. Ejido Petcacab. Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable y no Maderable en el Ejido Petcacab, Municipio de Felipe Carrillo Puerto; Official Forest Management Plan; Ejido Petcacab: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2011; p. 112.
105. Ejido Tres Garantías. Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental proyecto: Programa de Manejo Nivel Avanzado para el Aprovechamiento Forestal Maderable y no Maderable en el Ejido Tres Garantías, Municipio de Othón P. Blanco; Official Forest Management Plan; Ejido Tres Garantías: Quintana Roo, Mexico, 2011; p. 92.
106. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). Visión de México Sobre REDD+: Hacia una Estrategia Nacional; CONAFOR: Zapopan, Mexico, 2010; p. 57.
107. Rodriguez-Ward, D. Why Should We Certify Our Forests? Factors that Influence the Adoption and Maintenance of Forest Certification in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2013; p. 234.
108. Registro Forestal Nacional. Sistema Nacional de Información Forestal; Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR): Mexico City, Mexico, 2013.
109. Registro Agrario Nacional (RAN). Núcleos Agrarios que Adoptaron el Dominio Pleno de Parcelas Ejidales y Aportación de Tierras de uso Común a Sociedades Mercantiles; RAN: Mexico City, Mexico, 2007.
110. Casse, T.; Milhøj, A. While waiting for the answer: A critical review of meta-studies of tropical forest management. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 131, 334-342.
111. Wilshusen, P.R. Community adaptation or collective breakdown? The emergence of "work groups" in two forestry ejidos in Quintana Roo, Mexico. In The Community Forests of Mexico; Bray, D.B., Merino-Perez, L., Barry D., Eds.; University of Texas press: Austin, TX, USA, 2005; pp. 151-179.
112. Chan, C. Ejido Petcacab, Petcacab, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Personal communication, 2014.
113. Romero-Montero, J.A. Evaluación de los Factores Ambientales, Socioeconómicos e Institucionales que Intervienen en la Dinámica del Cambio de Cobertura Forestal en Ejidos de Campeche y Quintana Roo, México. Master's Thesis, Centro de Investigaciones Tropicales, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Mexico, 2014.
114. Forero, O.A.; Redclift, M. The production and marketing of sustainable forest products: Chewing gum in Mexico. Dev. Pract. 2007, 17, 196-207.
115. Santos, V. Organización Ejidal de Productores Forestales de la Zona Maya, Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Personal Communication, 2014.
116. Elizondo, C.; López Merlín, D. Las áreas Voluntarias de Conservación en Quintana Roo. Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano; Serie Acciones 6; Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO): Mexico City, Mexico, 2009; p. 130.
117. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). México Impulsa Acciones Contra el Cambio Climático a Través del Pago por Servicios Ambientales; CONAFOR: Mexico City, Mexico, 2009.
118. McAfee, K.; Shapiro, E.N. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2010, 100, 579-599.
119. Shapiro, E.N. Political Economy and Community-level Impacts of the Mexican Federal Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010.
120. Blanco-Reyes, P. Ejido Noh Bec, Noh Bec, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Personal Communication, 2014.
121. Wilshusen, P.R. ITTO Country Case Study: Petcacab. Sociedad de Productores Forestales Ejidales de Quintana Roo (SPFEQR), Quintana Roo, México; Rights and Resources Initiative (RRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
122. Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed; The Penguin Group: New York, NY, USA, 2005; p. 575.
123. Orlove, B. Human adaptation to climate change: A review of three historical cases and some general perspectives. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8, 589-600.
124. Turner, B.L., II; Sabloff, J.A. Classic period collapse of the Central Maya lowlands: Insights about human-environment relationships for sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13908-13914.
125. Rogan, J.; Schneider, L.; Christman, Z.; Millones, M.; Lawrence, D.; Schmook, B. Hurricane disturbance mapping using MODIS EVI data in the southeastern Yucatán, Mexico. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 2, 259-267.
126. DiGiano M.; Racelis, A.E. Robustness, adaptation and innovation: Forest communities in the wake of Hurricane Dean. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 33, 151-158.
127. Arguelles, A. Tropica Rural Latinoamericana A.C. (TRL), Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Personal Communication, 2015.
128. Navarro-Martínez, A.; Durán-García, R; Méndez-González, M. El Impacto del Huracán Dean sobre la estructura y composición arbórea de un bosque manejado en Quintana Roo, México. Madera y bosques 2012, 18, 57-76.
129. Grinsted, A.; Moore, J.C.; Jevrejeva, S. Projected Atlantic hurricane surge threat from rising temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 5369-5373.
130. Gobierno de la República. Programa Nacional Forestal 2014-2018; Gobierno de la República: Mexico City, Mexico, 2014; 144 p.
131. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR). Estrategia Nacional para REDD+ (ENAREDD+); CONAFOR: Zapopan, Guadalajara, Mexico, 2014.
132. Fernández-Vázquez, E.; MendozaFuente, N. Sobrerregulación Forestal: Un Obstáculo para el Desarrollo Sustentable de México; Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible (CCMSS): Mexico City, Mexico, 2015; p. 28.