The global significance of Mexican community forestry

The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 305-334

  Klooster, Dan ^a   Ambinakudige, Shrinidhi ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57049144664     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (112)

1. Acharya, K. P. 2002. Twenty-four years of community forestry in Nepal. International Forestry Review 4(2): 149-156.
2. Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions: Community forestry and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29(10): 1623-1648.
3. Anderson, R. S., and W. Huber. 1988. The Hour of the Fox: Tropical Forests, the World Bank, and Indigenous People in Central India. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
4. Arnold, J. E. M. 1992. Community Forestry: Ten Years in Review. Rome: FAO.
5. -. 1998. Managing Forests as Common Property: FAO Forestry. Paper no. 136. Rome: FAO.
6. Ascher, W. 1995. Communities and Sustainable Forestry in Developing Countries. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
7. Baker, M., and J. Kusel. 2003. Community Forestry in the United States: Learning from the Past, Crafting the Future. Washington DC: Island Press.
8. Becker, C. D., and R. Leon. 1998. Indigenous Forest Management in the Bolivian Amazon: Lessons from the Yuracare People. Paper presented at Crossing Boundaries, the Seventh Annual Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, 10-14 June, Vancouver, Canada.
9. Benavides, M., and M. Pariona. 1995. The Yanesha forestry cooperative and community-based management in the central Peruvian forest. Case studies of community-based forestry enterprises in the Americas. Paper presented at the Symposium Forestry in the Americas: Community-Based Management and Sustainability, 3-4 February, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
10. Berkes, F, D. Feeny, B. J. McCay, and J. M. Acheson. 1989. The benefit of the commons. Nature 340:91-93.
11. Bhattacharya, P., and B. Mitra. 2002. Lessons from self-initiated forest protection systems in India: An eye-opener to CPR studies. Ninth Biennial Conference of IASCP, 17-21 June, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
12. Blair, H. W, and P. D. Olpadwala. 1988. Forestry in Development Planning: Lessons from the Rural Experience. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Blumberg, L., and D. Knuffke. 1998. Count us out: Why the Wilderness Society opposed the Quincy Library Group legislation. Chronicle of Community 2(2): 41-44.
14. Bray, D. B., and L. Merino-Pérez. 2002. The rise of community forestry in Mexico: History, concepts, and lessons learned from 25years of community timber production (version 2). Report to the Ford Foundation.
15. Bray, D. B., L. Merino-Pérez, P. C. Negreros-Castillo, G. Segura-Warnholtz, J. M. Torres-Rojo, and H. F M. Vester. 2003. Mexico's community-managed forests: A global model for sustainable landscapes? Conservation Biology 17(3): 672-677.
16. Brown, D., Y. Malla, K. Schreckenberg, and O. Springate-Baginski. 2002. From supervising "subjects" to supporting "citizens": Recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa. Natural Resource Perspectives 75:1-4.
17. Brown, D., and K. Schreckenberg. 2001. Community forestry: Facing up to the challenge in Cameroon. Rural Development Forestry Network. Forestry paper no. 25a.
18. Brownie, K. 1998a. The context for community forestry in Bolivia: Forest legislation and policy. International Network of Forests and Communities. URL http://www.forestsandcommunities.org/Country-Profiles/bolivia.html. Accessed 5 May 2003.
19. -. 1998b. Peru country profile. International Network of Forests and Communities. URL http://www.forestsandcommunities.org/Country-Profiles/Peru. html. Accessed 30 October 2002.
20. Campbell, B., and S. Shackleton. 2001. The organizational structures for community-based natural resources management in southern Africa. African Studies Quarterly: The Online Journal for African Studies 5(3). URL http://web.africa.ufl.edu/asq/v5/v5i3a6.htm. Accessed 8 May 2003.
21. Cernea, M. M. 1985. Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development. New York: Oxford University Press and the World Bank.
22. Challenger, A. 1998. Utilizacióny conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México, pasado, presente y futuro. Mexico City: Comisión para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; Instituto de Biología, UNAM; Agrupación Sierra Madre, S.C.
23. Chayax Huex, R., F. Tzul Colli, C. Gomez Caal, and S. P. Gretzinger. 1998. The Bio-Itzá reserve: History of an indigenous effort to conserve the Itzá Maya community of San José, El Petén, Guatemala. In Timber, Tourists and Temples, ed. R. B. Primack, D. Bray, H. A. Galettim, and I. Ponciano, 317-326. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Cheng, A. S., L. E. Kruker, and S. E. Daniels. 2003. "Place" as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources 16:87-104.
25. Clay, J. W 1988. Indigenous Peoples and Tropical Forests. Cambridge: Cultural Survival.
26. Colchester, M. 2003. Bridging the gap: Challenges to community forestry networking in Indonesia, CIFOR, as part of its study of "Learning from International Community Forestry Networks." URL http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/ publications/pdf-files/CF/Indonesia-CF.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2003.
27. Colvin, R. 2002. Community-based environment protection, citizen participation, and the Albany Pine Bush Preserve. Society and Natural Resources 15:447-454.
28. Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and M. T Vargas Rios. 2002. Social, Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Forest Policy Reforms in Bolivia. Washington, DC, and Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Trends and CIFOR. URL http://www.forest-trends.org/whoweare/pdf/BoliviaEnglish.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2003.
29. Danks, C. 2000. Community forestry initiatives for the creation of sustainable rural livelihoods: A case from North America. Unasylva 51(202): 1-14. URL http://www.fao.org/docrep/x7273e/x7273e09.htm. Accessed 20 April 2003.
30. Ekoko, F 2000. Balancing politics, economics and conservation: The case of the Cameroon forestry law reform. Development and Change 31(1): 131-154.
31. Elias Gramajo, S. 1997. Autogestión comunitaria de recursos naturales: Estudio de caso en Totonicapán. Guatemala City, Guatemala: FLACSO.
32. Evans, B. 1999. United States: Forest legislation and policy. International Network of Forests and Communities. URL http://www. forestsandcommunities.org/CountryProfiles/us.html. Accessed 30 October 2002.
33. FAO. 1978. Forestry for Local Community Development. Rome: FAO.
34. -. 2002. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000 Main Report. Rome: FAO.
35. Fearnside, P. M. 1997. Environmental services as a strategy for sustainable development in rural Amazonia. Ecological Economics 20:53-70.
36. Ferroukhi, L., ed. 2003. La gestión fore stal municipal en América Latina. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research and IDRC. URL http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf-files/Books/ La-gestion27.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2003.
37. Foley, G., W. Floor, G. Madon, E. Mahamane Lawali, P. Montague, and K. Tounao. 1997. The Niger Household Energy Project: Promoting Fuelwood Markets and Village Management of Natural Woodlands. Washington, DC: World Bank.
38. Frentz, I. C, D. E. Voth, S. Burns, and C. W. Sperry. 2000. Forest service-community relationship building: recommendations. Society and Natural Resources 13:549-566.
39. Fried, S. G. 2000. Tropical forests forever? A contextual ecology of Bentian Rattan agroforestry systems. In People, Plants and Justice, ed. C. Zerner, 204-233. New York: Columbia University Press.
40. Friedmann, J. 1992. Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
41. Friedmann, J., and H. Rangan, eds. 1993. In Defense of Livelihood: Comparative Studies on Environmental Action. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
42. FSC. 2003. Forest Stewardship Council. Forest Stewardship Council website. URL http://www.fscoax.org. Accessed 2 May 2003.
43. Gadgil, M., and R. Guha. 1992. This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Government of India. 2000. Guidelines for Strengthening JFM. New Delhi, Ministry of Environment and Forests, no. 22-8/2000-JFM (FPD). URL: http://www.rupfor.org/jfm-india04d.htm. Accessed 14 May 2003.
45. -. 2003. Status of JFM (as of March 1, 2002). New Delhi, Ministry of Environment and Forests. URL: http://www.rupfor.org/jfm-india.htm. Accessed 11 May 2003.
46. Gretzinger, S. P. 1998. Community forest concessions: An economic alternative for the Maya Biosphere Reserve in the Petén, Guatemala. In Timber, Tourists, and Temples, ed. R. B. Primack, D. Bray, H. A. Galetti, and I. Ponciano, 111-124. Washington, DC: Island Press.
47. Guha, R. 1989. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalaya. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Hartshorn, G. S. 1989. Sustained yield management of natural forests: The Palcazu production forest. In Fragile Lands of Latin America: Strategies f or Sustainable Development, ed. J. O. Browder. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
49. Hecht, S. B., and A. Cockburn. 1990. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon. New York: HarperCollins.
50. Hildyard, N, P. Hegde, P. Wolvekamp, and S. Reddy. 1998. Same platform, different train: The politics of participation. Unasylva 194(49):26-34.
51. Hirschman, A. O. 1993. Getting Ahead Collectively: Grassroots Experiences in Latin America. Arlington, VA: Inter-American Foundation.
52. Human, J., and M. Pattanaik. 2000. Community Forest Management: A Casebook from India. Oxford: Oxfam.
53. Hunt, C. 2002. Production, Privatisation and Preservation in Papua New Guinea Forestry. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. URL http://www.iied.org/psf/publications-def.html#cert. Accessed 30 April 2003.
54. International Network of Forests and Communities. 2002. International Network of Forests and Communities. URL: http://www.forestsandcommunities.org/. Accessed 30 October 2002.
55. Johnson, N., and B. Cabarle. 1993. Surviving the Cut: Natural Forest Management in the Humid Tropics. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
56. Kerkhof, P. 2000. Local Forest Management in the Sahel: Towards a New Social Contract. London: SOS Sahel International UK.
57. Klooster, D. 2000. Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development 28(1): 1-20.
58. -. 2003. Campesinos and Mexican forest policy during the twentieth century. Latin American Research Review 38(2): 94-126.
59. Klooster, D., C. Allieri, M. Couffingal, B. Sharbono, S. E. J. Yeo, and G. Segura. 2000. Working with communities to strengthen forest management in Mexico. In Thinking Out Loud II: Innovative Case Studies on Participatory Instruments, ed. M. Anderson, 103-112. Washington, DC: Latin America and the Caribbean Civil Society Team of the World Bank. http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/ lae/lacinfoclient.nsf/d29684951174975e85256735007fef12. Accessed 29 June 2004.
60. Klooster, D., and O. Masera. 2000. Community forest management in Mexico: Carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Global Environmental Change 10(4): 43-70.
61. Kusel, J., and E. Adler, eds. 2001. Forest Communities, Community Forests: A Collection of Case Studies of Community Forestry. Taylorsville, CA: Forest Community Research.
62. Lázaro, M., M. Pariona, and R. Simeone. 1993. A natural harvest: The Yanesha forestry cooperative in Peru combines western science and indigenous knowledge. Cultural Survival Quarterly 17:48-51.
63. Lele, S. 1998. Godsend, sleight of hand, or just muddling through: Joint forest management in India. Paper presented at Conference on Crossing Boundaries: The Seventh Common Property Conference, 10-14 June, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
64. Lele, S., and A. S. Shrinidhi. 1998. Indian forest policy, forest law, and forest rights settlement: A serious mismatch. Paper presented at International Workshop on Capacity Building in Environmental Governance for Sustainable Development, 8-10 December, Indira Gandhi Institute for Development Research, Mumbai.
65. Liedtke, M. 1998. The context for community forestry in Papua New Guinea: Legislation, policy, tenure. Forests and Communities. URL: http://www. forestsandcommunities.org/Country-Profiles/Papua-New-Guinea.html. Accessed 5 May 2003.
66. -. 1999. The context for community forestry in Indonesia. Forests and Communities. URL: http://www.forestsandcommunities.org/Country-Profiles/ indonesia.html. Accessed 5 May 2003.
67. Lindayati, R. 2002. Ideas and institutions in social forestry policy. In Which Way Forward? People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia, ed. C. J. P. Colfer and I. A. P. Resosudarmo, 36-59. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. URL http://www.rffpress.org/rff/ExternalFiles/chapter2.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2003.
68. Lohmann, L. 1998. Briefing 4-Same platform, different train: The politics of participation. URL: http://cornerhouse.icaap.org/briefings/4.html. Accessed 14 May 2003.
69. Lynch, O., and K. Talbott. 1995. Balancing Acts: Community-Based Forest Management and National Law in Asia and Pacific. Washington, DC: WRI.
70. Martin, A. 1999. Imposing Local Resource Management: Government-Led Development of Community Institutions for Forest Management, South India, Bedford, UK: De Montfort University.
71. Martin, A., and M. Lemon. 2001. Challenges for participatory institutions: The case of village forest committees in Karnataka, South India. Society and Natural Resources 14:585-597.
72. McCarthy, J. F 2000. Forest Property and Reformasi in Indonesia. Development and Change 31(1): 91-130.
73. -. 2002. Turning in circles: District governance, illegal logging, and environmental decline in Sumatra, Indonesia. Society and Natural Resources 15:867-886.
74. McDaniel, J. 2002. Confronting the structure of international development: Political agency and the Chiquitanos of Bolivia. Human Ecology 30(3): 369-396.
75. Messerschmidt, D. A. 1993. Common Forest Resource Management: Annotated Bibliography of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Rome: FAO.
76. Michon, G., H. Foresta, Kusworo, and P. Levang. 2000. The Damar agroforests of Krui, Indonesia: Justice for forest farmers. In People, Plants and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation, ed. C. Zerner. New York: Columbia University Press.
77. Nolan, T. M. 2001. Community-based forest management: Commercial harvesting of the rainforest of Indonesia. The International Forestry Review 3(3):231-235.
78. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Peet, R., and M. Watts. 1996. Liberation ecology: Development, sustainability, and environment in an age of market triumphalism. In Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements, ed. R. Peet and M. Watts, 1-46. New York: Routledge.
80. Peluso, N L. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81. Peluso, N L., C. R. Humphrey, and L. Fortmann. 1994. The rock, the beach, and the tidal pool: People and poverty in natural resource dependent areas. Society and Natural Resources 7(1): 23-38.
82. PNG Eco-forestry Forum. 2002. PNG Eco-forestry Forum. URL: http://www.ecoforestry.org.pg. Accessed 30 April 2003.
83. Poffenberger, M. 1994. The resurgence of community forest management in eastern India. In Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. D. Western, R. M. Wright, and S. Strum, 53-79. Washington, DC: Island Press.
84. Poffenberger, M., and B. McGean, eds. 1996. Village Voices, Forest Choices: Joint Forest Management in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
85. Poffenberger, M., and C. Singh. 1996. Communities and the state: Re-establishing the balance in Indian forest policy. In Village Voices, Forest Choices: Joint Forest Management in India, ed. M. Poffenberger and B. McGean, 56-85. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
86. Rambo, A. T. 1984. Community forestry: The social view. In Community Forestry: Some Aspects, 39-47. Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Development Programme and E.-W Center.
87. Ravindranath, N. H., K. S. Murali, and K. C. Malhothra. 2000. Joint Forest Management and Community Forestry in India: An Ecological and Institutional Assessment. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
88. Redclift, M. 1987. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. New York: Methuen.
89. Ribot, J. C. 1995. From exclusion to participation: Turning Senegal's forestry policy around? World Development 23(9): 1587-1599.
90. -. 1999. Decentralisation, participation and accountability in Sahelian forestry: Legal instruments of political-administrative control. Africa 69(1):23-65.
91. -. 2000. Rebellion, representation, and enfranchisement in the forest villages of Makacoulibantang, Eastern Senegal. In People, Plants and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation, ed. C. Zerner, 134-158. New York: Columbia University Press.
92. -. 2002. Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation. Washington, DC: WRI.
93. Sarin, M. 1996. From conflict to collaboration: Institutional issues in community management. In Village Voices, Forest Choices: Joint Forest Management in India, ed. M. Poffenberger and B. McGean, 165-209. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
94. Saxena, N C, J. Sarin, R. V. Singh, and T Shah. 1997. Western Ghats Forestry Project: Independent Study of Implementation Experience in Kanara Circle. London: ODA.
95. Schwartz, N B. 1995. Colonization, development, and deforestation in Petén, Northern Guatemala. In The Social Causes of Environmental Destruction in Latin America, ed. M. Painter and W. H. Durham, 101-130. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
96. Shackleton, S., B. Campbell, E. Wollenberg, and D. Edmunds. 2002. Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local people to participate and benefit? Natural Resource Perspectives 76:1-6. URL http://www.odi.org.uk/nrp/76.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2003.
97. Stone, R. D., and C. D'Andrea. 2001. Tropical Forests and the Human Spirit. Berkeley: University of California Press.
98. Sundar, N 2000. Unpacking the "joint" in joint forest management. Development and Change 31:255-279.
99. Sundberg, J. 1998. Strategies for authenticity, space, and place in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Petén, Guatemala. Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers Yearbook 1998 24:85-96.
100. Tata Energy Resource Institute. 2002. National Study on Joint Forest Management. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
101. Thorburn, C. 2002. Regime change: Prospects for community-based resource management in post-new order Indonesia. Society and Natural Resources 15:617-628.
102. Turia, R. C. H. 2001. Masters of a domain or property owners: An analysis of forest use in Papua New Guinea. From tradition and globalisation: Critical issues for the accommodation of CPRs in the Pacific Region - The Inaugural Pacific Regional Meeting of the International Association for the Study of Common Property. Brisbane, Australia: Digital Library of the Commons.
103. Veblen, T. T. 1978. Forest preservation in the western highlands of Guatemala. Geographical Review 68:417-434.
104. Weber, E. P. 2000. A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society and Natural Resources 13:237-259.
105. Western, D., and R. M. Wright. 1994. The background to community-based conservation. In Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation, ed. D. Western, R. M. Wright, and S. C. Strum, 1-12. Washington, DC: Island Press.
106. Western, D., R. M. Wright, and S. C. Strum, eds. 1994. Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-Based Conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
107. White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition. Washington, DC: Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law.
108. Wilmer, F 1993. The Indigenous Voice in World Politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
109. World Bank. 1991. Forestry: The World Bank's Experience. Washington, DC: World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department.
110. -. 1997. World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. New York: Oxford University Press.
111. -. 2002. Revising the bank's forest policy: Key questions and answers.
112. World Bank. URL: http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/ESSD/essdext.nsf/ 14DocByUnid/0D92CD541CABDBA485256BD1006AAB62/$FILE/ RevisingForestPolicyKeyQandA.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2002.