The Alternative DSM-5 Personality Disorder Traits Criterion: A Comparative Examination of Three Self-Report Forms in a Danish Population

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 124-135

  Bach, Bo ^a   Maples Keller, Jessica L ^b   Bo, Sune ^a   Simonsen, Erik ^c  

^a Psychiatric Research Unit   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

assessment; DSM 5; personality disorders; personality traits; PID 5

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLASSIFICATION; DENMARK; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84949292717     PISSN: 19492715     EISSN: 19492723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/per0000162     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013b). The Personality Inventory DSM-5 (PID-5) Self-Report Form (full version). American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures#Personality
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013c). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF)-Adult. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures# Personality
4. Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Sansone, R. A., Songer, D. A. (2015). Comparing External Correlates of DSM-5 Section II and Section III Dimensional Trait Operationalizations of Borderline Personality Disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi-2015-29-189
5. Anderson, J., Snider, S., Sellbom, M., Krueger, R., Hopwood, C. (2014). A comparison of the DSM-5 Section II and Section III personality disorder structures. Psychiatry Research, 216, 363-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.01.007
6. Bach, B., Markon, K., Simonsen, E., Krueger, R. F. (2015). Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 21, 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000460618.02805.ef
7. Bastiaens, T., Claes, L., Smits, D., De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G.,. De Hert, M. (2015). The construct validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample. Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115575069
8. Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 800-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0
9. Bo, S., Bach, B., Mortensen, E. L., Simonsen, E. (2015). Reliability and hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological traits in a Danish mixed sample. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi-2015-29-187
10. Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Rojas, S. L., Widiger, T. A., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Widiger, T. A. (2015). The discriminant (and convergent) validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6, 321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000118
11. Crego, C., Widiger, T. A. (2014). Psychopathy, DSM-5, and a caution. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 335-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000078
12. De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Wille, B., Markon, K., Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113475808
13. Few, L. R., Miller, J. D., Rothbaum, A. O., Meller, S., Maples, J., Terry, D. P., MacKillop, J. (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034878
14. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Benjamin, L. S. (1994). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID II). New York, NY: Biometric Research Department.
15. Fossati, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Borroni, S., Maffei, C. (2013). Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5(PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113504984
16. Gore, W. L., Widiger, T. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032822
17. Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
18. Hopwood, C. J., Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240
19. Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., Markon, K. E. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 162-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9332-3
20. Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., Krueger, R. F. (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personal ity disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026656
21. James, L. M., Anders, S. L., Peterson, C. K., Engdahl, B. E., Krueger, R. F., Georgopoulos, A. P. (2015). DSM-5 personality traits discriminate between posttraumatic stress disorder and control groups. Experimental Brain Research, 233, 2021-2028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4273-1
22. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
23. Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E. (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
24. Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., Arntz, A. (2011). Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18, 75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.693
25. Lorenzo-Seva, U., ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2, 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
26. Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W. L., Samuel, D. B., Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000120
27. Markon, K. E., Quilty, L. C., Bagby, R. M., Krueger, R. F. (2013). The development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment, 20, 370-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486513
28. McCrae, R. R. (2008). A note on some measures of profile agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 105-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845104
29. Morey, L. C., Benson, K. T., Busch, A. J., Skodol, A. E. (2015). Personality disorders in DSM-5: Emerging research on the alternative model. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11920-015-0558-0
30. Morey, L. C., Krueger, R. F., Skodol, A. E. (2013). The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 836-841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034003
31. Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
32. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
33. Patrick, C. J., Hicks, B. M., Krueger, R. F., Lang, A. R. (2005). Relations between psychopathy facets and externalizing in a criminal offender sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 339-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2005.19.4.339
34. Pedersen, C. B., Mors, O., Bertelsen, A., Waltoft, B. L., Agerbo, E., McGrath, J. J., Eaton, W. W. (2014). A comprehensive nationwide study of the incidence rate and lifetime risk for treated mental disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, 71, 573-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.16
35. Quilty, L. C., Ayearst, L., Chmielewski, M., Pollock, B. G., Bagby, R. M. (2013). The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486183
36. Roskam, I., Galdiolo, S., Hansenne, M., Massoudi, K., Rossier, J., Gicquel, L., Rolland, J.-P. (2015). The psychometric properties of the French version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. PLoS ONE, 10, e0133413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133413
37. Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Krueger, R. F., Thomas, K. M., Ruggero, C. J. (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in. DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 353-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486182
38. Sellbom, M., Sansone, R. A., Songer, D. A., Anderson, J. L. (2014). Convergence between DSM-5 Section II and Section III diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 325-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004867413511997
39. Simms, L. J., Calabrese, W. R. (2015). Incremental validity of the DSM-5 Section III Personality Disorder Traits with respect to psychosocial impairment. Journal of Personality Disorders. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi-2015-29-185
40. Skodol, A. E. (2014). Personality disorder classification: Stuck in neutral, how to move forward? Current Psychiatry Reports, 16, 480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0480-x
41. Trull, T. J., Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144009
42. Tyrer, P. (2012). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: A classification of personality disorders that has had its day. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19, 372-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1810
43. Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., Mulder, R., Blashfield, R., Farnam, A., Fossati, A., Reed, G. M. (2011). The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personality and Mental Health, 5, 246-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmh.190
44. Tyrer, P., Reed, G. M., Crawford, M. J. (2015). Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. The Lancet, 385, 717-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61995-4
45. Van den Broeck, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., De Clercq, B., Hofmans, J. (2014). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPPBQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 198-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi-2013-27-114
46. Widiger, T. A., Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628
47. Wright, A. G. C., Simms, L. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 5, 43-54.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/per0000037
48. Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., Pincus, A. L., Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027669
49. Yam, W. H., Simms, L. J. S. (2014). Comparing criterion-and traitbased personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037633
50. Zachar, P., First, M. B. (2015). Transitioning to a dimensional model of personality disorder in DSM-5.1 and beyond. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28, 66-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000115
51. Zimmermann, J., Altenstein, D., Krieger, T., Holtforth, M. G., Pretsch, J., Alexopoulos, J., Leising, D. (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 518-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi-2014-28-130