Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: Six cases from practice

Journal of Psychiatric Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 3-25

  Bach, Bo ^a   Markon, Kristian ^b   Simonsen, Erik ^c   Krueger, Robert F ^d  

^a Psychiatric Clinic Slagelse   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c Psychiatric Research Unit   (Denmark)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical utility; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; diagnostics; Fifth Edition (DSM 5); five factor model; Levels of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS); personality disorders; personality functioning; Personality Inventory for DSM 5 (PID 5); personality traits; therapy

Indexed keywords

ANHEDONIA; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECEPTION; DISTRACTIBILITY; DSM-5; EMPATHY; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; IDENTITY; IMPULSIVENESS; INTIMACY; LEVEL OF PERSONALITY FUNCTIONING SCALE; MACHIAVELLIANISM; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL INSTABILITY; OUTPATIENT; PERSEVERATION; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY INVENTORY FOR DSM 5; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SELF CONCEPT; SELF ESTEEM; SELF EVALUATION; SEPARATION ANXIETY; SUSPICIOUSNESS; ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; MALE; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84922068101     PISSN: 15274160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000460618.02805.ef     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). 2013. In: DSM-5: pp. 775-778.
3. American Psychiatric Association. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) Adult-Full Version. 2013 (available at www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures#Personality, accessed Decem-ber 12, 2014
4. Morey LC, Skodol AE, Oldham JM. Clinician judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123:1-8.
5. Simonsen E. Commentary: A clinician's view of the proposed changes. Personal Ment Health. 2011;5:286-295.
6. Clarkin JF, Huprich SK. Do DSM-5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? J Pers Disord. 2011;25:192-205.
7. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
8. Mullins-Sweatt SN, Lengel GJ. Clinical utility of the fivefactor model of personality disorder. J Pers. 2012;80: 1615-1639.
9. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Associa-tion; 1980.
10. Frances A. Categorical and dimensional systems of personality diagnosis: A comparison. Compr Psychiatry. 1982; 23:516-527.
11. Frances A. Dimensional diagnosis of personality-not whether, but when and which. Psychol Inq. 1993;4:110-111.
12. First MB, Westen D. Classification for clinical practice: How to make ICD and DSM better able to serve clinicians. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19:473-481.
13. Widiger TA, Simonsen E, Krueger RF, et al. Personality disorder research agenda for the DSM-V. J Pers Disord. 2005;19:315-338.
14. Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, et al. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012;42:1879-1890.
15. Morey LC, Berghuis H, Bender DS, et al. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:347-353.
16. Morey LC, Skodol AE. Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. J Psychiatr Pract. 2013;19(3):179-193.
17. American Psychiatric Association. Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF)-Adult. 2013 (available at www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessmentmeasures# Personality, accessed December 18, 2014
18. Widiger TA, Costa Jr. PT, McCrae RR. Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. 3rd Ed. American Psychological Association; 2012.
19. Markon KE, Quilty LC, Bagby RM, et al. The Development and psychometric properties of an informant-report form of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Assessment. 2013;20:370-383.
20. Samuel DB. Assessing personality in the DSM-5: The utility of bipolar constructs. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:390-397.
21. Bender DS, Morey LC, Skodol AE. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: A review of theory and methods. J Pers Assess. 2011;93: 332-346.
22. Zimmermann J, Benecke C, Bender DS, et al. Assessing DSM-5 level of personality functioning from videotaped clinical interviews: A pilot study with untrained and clinically inexperienced students. J Pers Assess. 2013;(April 2014):37-41.
23. Few LR, Miller JD, Rothbaum AO, et al. Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122:1057-1069.
24. De Clercq B, De Fruyt F, De Bolle M, Vet al. The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID-5 trait measure in adolescence. J Pers. 2014;82:158-169.
25. Wright AGC, Thomas KM. The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121:951-957.
26. Broeck J Van den, Bastiaansen L, Rossi G, et al. Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. J Pers Disord. 2014;2:198-211.
27. Gore W, Widiger TA. The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122:816-821.
28. Fruyt F De, Clercq B De, Bolle M De, et al. General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment. 2013;20: 295-307.
29. Watson D, Stasik SMS, Ro E, et al. Integrating normal and pathological personality relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment. 2013;20:312-326.
30. Thomas KM, Yalch MM, Krueger RF, et al. The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment. 2013;20:308-311.
31. Ashton MC, Lee K, de Vries RE, et al. The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. J Pers Disord. 2012;26: 641-659.
32. Quilty LC, Ayearst L, Chmielewski M, et al. The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample. Assessment. 2013;20: 362-369.
33. Hopwood CJ, Thomas KM, Markon KE, et al. DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121:424-432.
34. Hopwood CJ, Wright AGC, Krueger RF, et al. DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the personality assessment inventory. Assessment. 2013;20:269-285.
35. Sellbom M, Anderson JL, Bagby RM. Assessing DSM-5 Section III personality traits and disorders with the MMPI 2-RF. Assessment. 2013;20:709-722.
36. Wright AGC, Pincus AL, Hopwood CJ, et al. An interpersonal analysis of pathological personality traits in DSM-5. Assessment. 2012;19:263-275.
37. Hopwood CJ, Schade N, Krueger RF, et al. Connecting DSM-5 personality traits and pathological beliefs: Toward a unifying model. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2012;35: 162-172.
38. Wright AGC, Pincus AL, Thomas KM, et al. Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Assessment. 2013;20:339-352.
39. Sellbom M, Sansone RA, Songer DA, et al. Convergence between DSM-5 Section II and Section III diagnostic criteria for borderline personality disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014;48:325-332.
40. Strickland CM, Drislane LE, Lucy M, et al. Characterizing psychopathy using DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment. 2013;20:327-338.
41. Fossati A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, et al. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment. 2013; 20:689-708.
42. Verheul R. Clinical utility of dimensional models for personality pathology. J Pers Disord. 2005;19:283-302.
43. Lowe JR, Widiger TA. Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of the DSM-IV with dimensional models of general personality. J Pers Disord. 2009;23: 211-229.
44. Bernstein DP, Iscan C, Maser J. Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders. J Pers Disord. 2007;21:536-551.
45. Bo S, Bach B, Mortensen EL, et al. Reliability and hierarchical structure of DSM-5 personality traits in a Danish mixed sample. J Personal Disord. (in press
46. Sheehan D V, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59:22-57.
47. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, et al. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID II). New York: Biometric Research Department; 1994.
48. Zimmerman M. The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 2005; 162:1911-1918.
49. Mullins-Sweatt SN, Widiger TA. Clinical utility and DSMV. Psychol Assess. 2009;21:302-312.
50. Pilkonis PA, Hallquist MN, Morse JQ, et al. Striking the (im)proper balance between scientific advances and clinical utility: Commentary on the DSM-5 proposal for personality disorders. Personal Disord. 2011;2:68-82.
51. Verheul R. Personality disorder proposal for DSM-5: A heroic and innovative but nevertheless fundamentally flawed attempt to improve DSM-IV. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012;19:369-71.
52. Clarkin JF, Caligor E, Stern BL, et al. Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). New York: Personality Disorders Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; 2003.
53. Archer RP, Smith SR. Personality Assessment. Routledge: 2008.
54. Simonsen E. The integration of categorical and dimensional approaches to psychopathology. In: Millon T, Krueger RF, Simonsen E, eds. Contemporary Directions in Psycho-pathology: Scientific Foundations of the DSM-V and ICD- New York: Guilford Press; 2010.
55. First MB, Pincus HA, Levine JB, et al. Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:946-954.
56. First MB. Clinical utility: A prerequisite for the adoption of a dimensional approach in DSM. J Abnorm Psychol. 2005;114:560-564.
57. Samuel DB, Carroll KM, Rounsaville BJ, et al. Personality disorders as maladaptive, extreme variants of normal personality: Borderline personality disorder and neuroticism in a substance using sample. J Pers Disord. 2013;27: 625-635.
58. Matthews G, Deary IJ, Whiteman MC. Personality Traits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
59. Livesley J. Keynote lecture at the XIII International Congress on the Disorders of Personality, 19th of September. XIII Int Congr Disord Personal. 2013:K-06 (available at www.isspd2013.com, accessed December 18, 2014
60. Pincus AL, Gurtman MB. Interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex: Evolving perspectives on normal and abnormal personality. In: Strack S, ed. Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality. Springer Publishing Co; 2006:83-111.
61. Horowitz LM, Wilson KR. Interpersonal motives and personality disorders. In: Strack S, ed. Handbook of Personology and Psychopathology. Philadelphia: Wiley; 2005:495-510.
62. Hopwood CJ. Symposium presentation at the XIII International Congress on the Disorders of Personality, the 18th of September. 2013:IS-05 (available at: www.isspd2013.com, accessed December 18, 2014
63. Krueger RF, Tackett JL. Personality and Psychopathology. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
64. Berghuis H, Hutsebaut J, Kaasenbrood A, et al. The Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5). EESPD Sci News. 2013 (available at www.esspd.eu/fileadmin/user-upload/ESSPD-Newsletter/Downloads-Newsletter/4-5-ESSPD-Newsletter-January-2014.pdf, accessed December 18, 2014
65. Hesse M, Thylstrup B. Assessing the levels of personality functioning scale through a semi-structured interview: A Danish research project. ESSPD Newsl. 2014 (available at www.esspd.eu/newsletter/papers/singleview/scientificnews-classification-of-personality-disorder-and-assessment-of-personality-functioning/9e1cb2b9884c57044b666f8 ae8d17264.html, accessed April 29, 2014
66. American Psychiatric Association. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Informant Form (PID-5-IRF)-Adult. 2013 (available at www.psychiatry.org/practice/dsm/dsm5/online-assessment-measures#Personality, accessed Decem-ber 18, 2014
67. Morey LC, Krueger RF, Skodol AE. The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. J Abnorm Psychol. 2013;122:836-41.