Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews

Risk Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2183-2201

  Shi, Jing ^a   Visschers, Vivianne H M ^a   Siegrist, Michael ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Climate related knowledge; Concern about climate change; Cultural worldviews; Willingness to change behavior

Indexed keywords

PHYSIOLOGY; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES; CLIMATE-RELATED KNOWLEDGE; CULTURAL VALUE; CULTURAL WORLDVIEWS; MAIL SURVEYS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; RISK COMMUNICATION; WILLINGNESS TO CHANGE BEHAVIOR;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTURAL RELATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL COGNITION; VIEW;

SWITZERLAND;

ADULT; AGED; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTURAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK; SWITZERLAND;

ADULT; AGED; CLIMATE CHANGE; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC OPINION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84949267613     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12406     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press 2013.
2. Von Borgstede C, Andersson M, Johnsson F. Public attitudes to climate change and carbon mitigation-Implications for energy-associated behaviours. Energy Policy, 2013; 57:182-193.
3. Gadenne D, Sharma B, Kerr D, Smith T. The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 2011; 39(12):7684-7694.
4. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 2011; 14(2):147-174.
5. Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(1):113-126.
6. Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 2012; 2(10):732-735.
7. Tobler C, Visschers VH, Siegrist M. Consumers' knowledge about climate change. Climatic Change, 2012; 114(2):189-209.
8. Milfont TL. The interplay between knowledge, perceived efficacy, and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):1003-1020.
9. Eden S. Environmental issues: Knowledge, uncertainty and the environment. Progress in Human Geography, 1998; 22(3):425-432.
10. Leiserowitz A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 2005; 25(6):1433-1442.
11. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF. Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 2006; 77(1-2):73-95.
12. Schultz PW, Zelezny L. Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review, 2003; 10(2):126-136.
13. Kemmelmeier M, Krol G, Kim YH. Values, economics, and proenvironmental attitudes in 22 societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 2002; 36(3):256-285.
14. Franzen A, Meyer R. Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 2010; 26(2):219-234.
15. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002-2010. Climatic Change, 2012; 114(2):169-188.
16. Dumitrescu D, Mughan A. Mass media and democratic politics. Pp. 477-491 in KT Leicht, Jenkins JC (eds). Handbook of Politics. Springer, 2010.
17. Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 2007; 17(3):445-459.
18. Poortinga W, Spence A, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Pidgeon NF. Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 2011; 21(3):1015-1024.
19. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 2006; 77(1-2):45-72.
20. Weber EU. What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2010; 1(3):332-342.
21. Saleh Safi A, James Smith W, Liu Z. Rural Nevada and climate change: Vulnerability, beliefs, and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):1041-1059.
22. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The rise of global warming skepticism: Exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):1021-1032.
23. Spence A, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):957-972.
24. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. Sociological Quarterly, 2011; 52(2):155-194.
25. Tobler C, Visschers VH, Siegrist M. Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2012; 32(3):197-207.
26. Dunlap RE, Bechtel R, Churchman A. Environmental sociology. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 2002; 2:160-171.
27. Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA. Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008; 35(5):479-487.
28. Stern PC, Dietz T, Kalof L. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 1993; 25(5):322-348.
29. Semenza JC, Wilson DJ, Parra J, Bontempo BD, Hart M, Sailor DJ, George LA. Public perception and behavior change in relationship to hot weather and air pollution. Environmental Research, 2008; 107(3):401-411.
30. Corner A. Psychology: Science literacy and climate views. Nature Climate Change, 2012; 2(10):710-711.
31. McCaffrey M, Rosenau J. Science literacy still matters. Nature Climate Change, 2012; 2(9):636-636.
32. Bord RJ, O'Connor RE, Fisher A. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 2000; 9(3):205-218.
33. Stevenson K, Peterson MN, Bondell H, Moore S, Carrier S. Overcoming skepticism with education: Interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Climatic Change, 2014; 126(3-4):293-304.
34. Douglas M, Wildavsky A. How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process? Risk Analysis, 1982; 2(2):49-58.
35. Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, Slovic P, Mertz C. Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2007; 4(3):465-505.
36. Kahan DM, Braman D, Monahan J, Callahan L, Peters E. Cultural cognition and public policy: The case of outpatient commitment laws. Law and Human Behavior, 2010; 34(2):118.
37. Swiss Statistics (2012). Bevölkerungsstand und -struktur [Population size and composition]. Available at: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/01/02/blank/data/01.html, Accessed September 2, 2013.
38. Swiss Statistics (2012). Bildungsstand der Wohnbevölkerung nach Alter und Geschlecht [Education level of the resident population according to age and gender]. Available at: http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/20/05/blank/key/gleichstellung_und/bildungsstand.html, Accessed September 2, 2013.
39. Bord RJ, Fisher A, O'Connor RE. Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Climate Research, 1998; 11(1):75-84.
40. Leiserowitz A. International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change. Human Development Report, 2007; 2008.
41. Ferguson MA, Branscombe NR, Reynolds KJ. The effect of intergroup comparison on willingness to perform sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011; 31(4):275-281.
42. Van Schuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 2003; 11(2):139-163.
43. Molenaar IW, Sijtsma K. MPS5 for Windows. A program for Mokken scale analysis for polytomous items. Version 5.0. Groningen: iec ProGAMMA, 2000.
44. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.
45. Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1991.
46. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
47. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 2008; 40(3):879-891.
48. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 2002; 8(3):239-260.
49. Nolan JM. "An Inconvenient Truth" increases knowledge, concern, and willingness to reduce greenhouse gases. Environment and Behavior, 2010; 42(5):643-658.
50. Skamp K, Boyes E, Stanisstreet M. Beliefs and willingness to act about global warming: Where to focus science pedagogy? Science Education, 2013; 97(2):191-217.
51. Swim JK, Stern PC, Doherty TJ, Clayton S, Reser JP, Weber EU, Gifford R, Howard GS. Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 2011; 66(4):241-250.
52. Wackernagel M, Rees WE. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers, 1996.
53. Corner A, Markowitz E, Pidgeon N. Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. Climate Change, 2014; 5(3):411-422.
54. O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Yarnal B, Wiefek N. Who wants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Social Science Quarterly, 2002; 83(1):1-17.
55. Nilsson A, von Borgstede C, Biel A. Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2004; 24(3):267-277.
56. Scruggs L, Benegal S. Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 2012; 22(2):505-515.
57. Klima K, Bruine de Bruin W, Morgan MG, Grossmann I. Public perceptions of hurricane modification. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(7):1194-1206.
58. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 2011; 1(1):46-49.
59. Capstick SB, Pidgeon NF. Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. Climatic Change, 2013:1-14.
60. Wood M, Kovacs D, Bostrom A, Bridges T, Linkov I. Flood risk management: US Army Corps of Engineers and layperson perceptions. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(8):1349-1368.
61. Roeser S. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis, 2012; 32(6):1033-1040.
62. Böhm G, Pfister H-R. Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 2000; 104(3):317-337.
63. Montada L, Kals E, Becker R. Willingness for continued social commitment: A new concept in environmental research. Environment and Behavior, 2007; 39(3):287-316.
64. Smith N, Leiserowitz A. The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Analysis, 2014; 34(5):937-948.
65. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G, Roth C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 2000; 20(3):353-362.
66. Schwarz M, Thompson M. Divided We Stand: Re-Defining Politics, Technology and Social Choice. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.
67. Mamadouh V. Grid-group cultural theory: An introduction. GeoJournal, 1999; 47(3):395-409.