Heterogeneity in the relationship between the built environment and driving: Focus on neighborhood type and travel purpose

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 34-45

  Salon, Deborah ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Commute; Land use; Non work; Residential self selection; Selection model; VMT

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949195835     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bento A.M., Cropper M.L., Mobarak A.M., Vinha K. The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 2005, 87(3):466-478.
2. Boarnet M.G., Sarmiento S. Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban Studies 1998, 35(7):1155-1169.
3. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) California statewide household travel survey, 2000-2001. [Computer file] 2001.
4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) California household travel survey, 2012-2013. [Computer file] 2013.
5. Cao X., Mokhtarian P.L., Handy S.L. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews 2009, 29(3):359-395.
6. Cervero R., Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 1997, 2(3):199-219.
7. ESRI Corporation U.S. and Canada detailed streets. [CD-ROM] 2010.
8. Dubin J.A., McFadden D.L. An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society 1984, 345-362.
9. Dye R.A., Sutherland C. A new metric to gauge household economic stress: improving on the misery index. Business Economics 2009, 44(2):109-113.
10. Ewing R., Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 76(3):265-294.
11. Foster G., Kalenkoski C.M. Tobit or OLS? an empirical evaluation under different diary window lengths. Applied Economics 2013, 45(20):2994-3010.
12. Handy S. Regional versus local accessibility: implications for nonwork travel. Transportation Research Record 1993, 1400:58-66.
13. Kitamura R., Mokhtarian P.L., Laidet L. A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 1997, 24(2):125-158.
14. Madre J.L., Axhausen K.W., Brög W. Immobility in travel diary surveys. Transportation 2007, 34(1):107-128.
15. Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Bay area travel survey. [Computer file] 2000.
16. Mokhtarian P.L., Cao X. Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transportation Research Part B Methodological 2008, 42(3):204-228.
17. Oil Price Information Service Gasoline prices by zip code, 2005. [Computer file] 2012.
18. Salon D., Boarnet M.G., Handy S., Spears S., Tal G. How do local actions affect VMT? A critical review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment 2012, 17(7):495-508.
19. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) San Diego travel behavior survey. [Computer file] 2006.
20. Song Y., Knaap G.J. Quantitative classification of neighbourhoods: the neighbourhoods of new single-family homes in the Portland Metropolitan Area. Journal of Urban Design 2007, 12(1):1-24.
21. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Year 2000 post-census regional travel survey. [Computer file] 2000.
22. Stewart J. Tobit or not tobit?. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 2013, 3:263-290.
23. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index, 2000-2013 2014, Available at. http://www.bls.gov/cpi/.
24. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Unemployment rate in California, 2000-2013 2014, Available at. http://www.bls.gov/lau/data.htm.
25. United States Census Bureau 2000 decennial census, summary files 1 and 3 2000, Available at. http://www.census.gov.
26. United States Census Bureau Longitudinal employer-household dynamics origin-destination employment statistics, residence area characteristic data, version 5.0, 2003 2003, Available at. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/.
27. United States Census Bureau 2010 decennial census 2010, Available at. http://www.census.gov.
28. United States Census Bureau Longitudinal employer-household dynamics origin-destination employment statistics, residence area characteristic data, version 5.0, 2010 2010, Available at. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/.
29. United States Census Bureau American community survey 5-year average by census tract 2012, Available at. http://www.census.gov.
30. United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA) Monthly retail gasoline and diesel prices in California, 2000-2013 2014, Available at. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMM_EPM0_PTE_SCA_DPG&f=M.
31. United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) National household travel survey. [Computer file] 2009.
32. United States Federal Housing Finance Agency (USFHFA) All transactions house price index for California, 2000-2013 2014, Available at. https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CASTHPI/.
33. Vance C., Hedel R. The impact of urban form on automobile travel: disentangling causation from correlation. Transportation 2007, 34(5):575-588.