Biofilms of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus fermentum: Effect on stress responses, antagonistic effects on pathogen growth and immunomodulatory properties

Food Microbiology

Volumn 53, Issue , 2016, Pages 51-59

  Aoudia, Nabil ^a   Rieu, Aurélie ^a   Briandet, Romain ^b   Deschamps, Julien ^b   Chluba, Johanna ^c,d   Jego, Gaëtan ^c,d   Garrido, Carmen ^c,d,e   Guzzo, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^b UMR1319 MICALIS   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^e CGFL   (France)

Author keywords

Immunomodulatory effects; Lactobacillus biofilms; Probiotic; Zebrafish model

Indexed keywords

CULTURE MEDIUM; IL10 PROTEIN, HUMAN; INTERLEUKIN 10; PROBIOTIC AGENT; TNF PROTEIN, HUMAN; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR;

ANIMAL; ANTIBIOSIS; BILE; BIOFILM; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; IMMUNOMODULATION; INNATE IMMUNITY; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MICROBIOLOGY; MONOCYTE; MUCUS; PHYSIOLOGY; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; ANTIBIOSIS; BILE; BIOFILMS; CULTURE MEDIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; IMMUNOMODULATION; INTERLEUKIN-10; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; MONOCYTES; MUCUS; PROBIOTICS; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84949100061     PISSN: 07400020     EISSN: 10959998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2015.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ambalam P., Kondepudi K.K., Nilsson I., Wadström T., Ljungh Å. Bile stimulates cell surface hydrophobicity, Congo red binding and biofilm formation of Lactobacillus strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 333:10-19.
2. Atuma C., Strugala V., Allen A., Holm L. The adherent gastrointestinal mucus gel layer: thickness and physical state in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2001, 280:G922-G929.
3. Bahrami B., Child M.W., Macfarlane S., Macfarlane G.T. Adherence and cytokine induction in caco-2 cells by bacterial populations from a three-stage continuous-culture model of the large intestine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:2934-2942.
4. Begley M., Hill C., Gahan C.G.M. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:1729-1738.
5. Bell A., Sellers L., Allen A., Cunliffe W., Morris E., Ross-Murphy S. Properties of gastric and duodenal mucus: effect of proteolysis, disulfide reduction, bile, acid, ethanol, and hypertonicity on mucus gel structure. Gastroenterology 1985, 88:269-280.
6. Bollinger R.R., Barbas A.S., Bush E.L., Lin S.S., Parker W. Biofilms in the normal human large bowel: fact rather than fiction. Gut 2007, 56:1481-1482.
7. Bridier A., Dubois-Brissonnet F., Boubetra A., Thomas V., Briandet R. The biofilm architecture of sixty opportunistic pathogens deciphered using a high throughput CLSM method. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2010, 82:64-70.
8. Costerton J., Stewart P., Greenberg E. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 1999, 284:1318-1322.
9. Daniel C., Poiret S., Goudercourt D., Dennin V., Leyer G., Pot B. Selecting lactic acid bacteria for their safety and functionality by use of a mouse colitis model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:5799-5805.
10. Desroche N., Beltramo C., Guzzo J. Determination of an internal control to apply reverse transcription quantitative PCR to study stress response in the lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni. J. Microbiol. Meth. 2005, 60:325-333.
11. FAO/WHO Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria 2001, Report of the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations/World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria.
12. Fayol-Messaoudi D., Berger C.N., Coconnier-Polter M.-H., Moal V.L.-L., Servin A.L. pH-, lactic acid-, and non-lactic acid-dependent activities of probiotic Lactobacilli against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:6008-6013.
13. Hugo A., Kakisu E., Antoni G.D., Perez P. Lactobacilli antagonize biological effects of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in vitro. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 46:613-619.
14. Hung D.T., Zhu J., Sturtevant D., Mekalanos J.J. Bile acids stimulate biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59:193-201.
15. Jenkinson H.F., Lamont R.J. Oral microbial communities in sickness and in health. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13:589-595.
16. Jones M., Martoni C., Prakash S. Cholesterol lowering and inhibition of sterol absorption by Lactobacillus reuteri NCIMB 30242: a randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 66:1234-1241.
17. Jones S.E., Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9:1471-2180.
18. Kaushik J.K., Kumar A., Duary R.K., Mohanty A.K., Grover S., Batish V.K. Functional and probiotic attributes of an indigenous isolate of Lactobacillus plantarum. Plos One 2009, 4:e8099.
19. Kleerebezem M., Boekhorst J., Kranenburg R.v., Molenaar D., Kuipers O.P., Leer R., et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:1990-1995.
20. Kobayashi H. Airway biofilms: implications for pathogenesis and therapy of respiratory tract infections. Treat. Respir. Med. 2005, 4:241-253.
21. Kubota H., Senda S., Nomura N., Tokuda H., Uchiyama H. Biofilm formation by lactic acid bacteria and resistance to environmental stress. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106:381-386.
22. Kubota H., Senda S., Tokuda H., Uchiyama H., Nomura N. Stress resistance of biofilm and planktonic Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JCM 1149. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26:592-597.
23. Lambert J.M., Bongers R.S., Vos W.M.d., Kleerebezem M. Functional analysis of four bile salt hydrolase and penicillin acylase family members in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74:4719-4726.
24. Lamine F., Eutamène H., Fioramonti J., Buéno L., Théodorou V. Colonic responses to Lactobacillus farciminis treatment in trinitrobenzene sulphonic acid-induced colitis in rats. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2004, 39:1250-1258.
25. Lebeer S., Vanderleyden J., de Keersmaecker S.C.J. Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72:728-764.
26. Lebeer S., Verhoeven T.L.A., Vélez M.P., Vanderleyden J., Keersmaecker S.C.J.D. Impact of environmental and genetic factors on biofilm formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:6768-6775.
27. Llopis M., Antolín M., Guarner F., Salas A., Malagelada J.R. Mucosal colonisation with Lactobacillus casei mitigates barrier injury induced by exposure to trinitronbenzene sulphonic acid. Gut 2005, 54:955-959.
28. Lewis K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45:999-1007.
29. Martín R., Soberón N., Vaneechoutte M., Flórez A.B., Vázquez F., Suárez J.E. Characterization of indigenous vaginal lactobacilli from healthy women as probiotic candidates. Int. Microbiol. 2008, 11:261-266.
30. McLauchlan G., Fullarton G.M., Crean G.P., McColl K.E.L. Comparison of gastric body and antral pH: a 24 hour ambulatory study in healthy volunteers. Gut 1989, 30:573-578.
31. Mikelsaar M., Zilmer M. Lactobacillus fermentum ME-3-an antimicrobial and antioxidative probiotic. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2009, 21:1-27.
32. Ohland C., Macnaughton W. Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 298:G807-G819.
33. Palomino M.M., Allievi M.C., Gründling A., Sanchez-Rivas C., Ruzal S.M. Osmotic stress adaptation in Lactobacillus casei BL23 leads to structural changes in the cell wall polymer lipoteichoic acid. Microbiology 2013, 159:2416-2426.
34. Pathmakanthan S., Li C.K., Cowie J., Hawkey C.J. Lactobacillus plantarum 299: beneficial in vivo immunomodulation in cells extracted from inflamed human colon. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004, 19:166-173.
35. Prigent-Combaret C., Brombacher E., Vidal O., Ambert A., Lejeune P., Landini P., Dorel C. Complex regulatory network controls Initial adhesion and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli via regulation of the csgD gene. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183:7213-7223.
36. Pumbwe L., Skilbeck C.A., Nakano V., Avila-Campos M.J., Piazza R.M.F., Wexler H.M. Bile salts enhance bacterial co-aggregation, bacterial-intestinal epithelial cell adhesion, biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance of Bacteroides fragilis. Microb. Pathog. 2007, 43:78-87.
37. Ramasamy K., Abdullah N., Wong M., Karuthan C., Ho Y. Bile salt deconjugation and cholesterol removal from media by Lactobacillus strains used as probiotics in chickens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90:65-69.
38. Rendueles O., Ferrières L., Frétaud M., Bégaud E., Herbomel P., Levraud J.-P., Ghigo J.-M. A new zebrafish model of oro-intestinal pathogen colonization reveals a key role for adhesion in protection by probiotic bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8:e1002815.
39. Rieu A., Weidmann S., Garmyn D., Piveteau P., Guzzo J. agr system of Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e: role in adherence and differential expression pattern. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:6125-6133.
40. Rieu A., Aoudia N., Jego G., Chluba J., Yousfi N., Briandet R., Deschamps J., Gasquet B., Monedero V., Garrido C., Guzzo J. The biofilm mode of life boosts the anti-inflammatory properties of Lactobacillus. Cell. Microbiol. 2014, 16:1836-1853.
41. Sarxelin M., Tynkkynen S., Mattila-sandholm T., Vos W.M.d Probiotic and other functional microbes: from markets to mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 16:204-211.
42. Sauer K., Camper A.K., Ehrlich G.D., Costerton J.W., Davies D.G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184:1140-1154.
43. Shikuma N.J., Yildiz F.H. Identification and characterization of OscR, a transcriptional regulator involved in osmolarity adaptation in Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191:4082-4096.
44. Sonnenburg J.L., Angenent L.T., Gordon J.I. Getting a grip on things: how do communities of bacterial symbionts become established in our intestine?. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5:569-573.
45. Southey-Pillig C.J., Davies D.G., Sauer K. Characterization of temporal protein production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187:8114-8126.
46. Stewart P.S., Franklin M.J. Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6:199-210.
47. Sugimura Y., Hagi T., Hoshino T. Correlation between in vitro mucus adhesion and the in vivo colonization ability of lactic acid bacteria: screening of new candidate carp probiotics. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2011, 75:511-515.
48. Tassell M.L.V., Miller M.J. Lactobacillus adhesion to mucus. Nutrients 2011, 3:613-636.
49. Vesa T., Pochart P., Marteau P. Pharmacokinetics of Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 8826, Lactobacillus fermentum KLD, and Lactococcus lactis MG 1363 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 14:823-828.
50. Whiteley M., Bangera M.G., Bumgarner R.E., Parsek M.R., Teitzel G.M., Lory S., Greenberg E.P. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 2001, 413:860-864.
51. Yan F., Cao H., Cover T.L., Whitehead R., Washington¶ M.K., Polk D.B. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:562-575.