Bile stimulates cell surface hydrophobicity, Congo red binding and biofilm formation of Lactobacillus strains

FEMS Microbiology Letters

Volumn 333, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 10-19

  Ambalam, Padma ^a   Kondepudi, Kanthi Kiran ^a,b   Nilsson, Ingrid ^a   Wadström, Torkel ^a   Ljungh, Åsa ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Danish Innovation Institute   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Bile; Biofilm; Cell surface hydrophobicity; Congo red binding; Lactobacilli; Mucin

Indexed keywords

CONGO RED;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BACTERIAL VIRULENCE; BINDING ASSAY; BIOFILM; CELL SURFACE; CELL SURFACE HYDROPHOBICITY; CENTRIFUGATION; CONGO RED BINDING ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; IONIC STRENGTH; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS CRISPATUS; LACTOBACILLUS GASSERI; LACTOBACILLUS JOHNSONII; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; BILE; BIOFILMS; CHOLESTEROL; CONGO RED; CULTURE MEDIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; LACTOBACILLUS; MUCINS; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; STAINING AND LABELING; TAUROCHOLIC ACID; TIME FACTORS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS CRISPATUS; LACTOBACILLUS PARACASEI; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; SUS;

EID: 84863826234     PISSN: 03781097     EISSN: 15746968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02590.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Antikainen J, Korhonen TK, Kuparinen V, Toba T & Roos S (2009) Surface proteins of Lactobacillus involved in host interactions. Lactobacillus Molecular Biology. From Genomics to Probiotics (Ljungh Å & Wadstrom T, eds), pp. 95-114. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk.
2. Avall-Jääskeläinen S & Palva A (2005) Lactobacillus surface layers and their applications. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 511-529.
3. Begley M, Kerr C & Hill C (2009) Exposure to bile influences biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes. Gut Pathog 28: 11.
4. Blanco LP, Evans ML, Smith DR, Badtke MP & Chapman MR (2012) Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids. Trends Microbiol 20: 66-73.
5. Cangelosi GA, Palermo CO, Laurent JP, Hamlin AM & Brabant WH (1999) Colony morphotypes on Congo red agar segregate along species and drug susceptibility lines in the Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex. Microbiology 145: 1317-1324.
6. Cheung AL & Fischetti VA (1988) Variation in the expression of cell wall proteins of Staphylococcus aureus grown on solid and liquid media. Infect Immun 56: 1061-1065.
7. Cole SP, Harwood J, Lee R, She R & Guiney DG (2004) Characterization of monospecies biofilm formation by Helicobacter pylori. J Bacteriol 186: 3124-3132.
8. de Jesus MC, Urban AA, Marasigan ME & Barnett-Foster DE (2005) Acid and bile-salt stress of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli enhances adhesion to epithelial cells and alters glycolipid receptor binding specificity. J Infect Dis 192: 1430-1440.
9. Doyle RJ & Rosenberg M (1990) Microbial cell surface hydrophobicity: history, measurement, and significance. Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity (Doyle RJ & Rosenberg M, eds), pp. 1-39. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
10. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2007) Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA. EFSA J 587: 1-16.
11. Friedman L & Kolter R (2004) Genes involved in matrix formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilms. Mol Microbiol 51: 675-690.
12. Goulter RM, Gentle IR & Dyes GA (2010) Characterization of curli production, cell surface hydrophobicity, nm aggregation and attachment behaviour of Escherichia coli O157. Curr Microbiol 61: 157-162.
13. Hung DT, Zhu J, Sturtevant D & Mekalanos JJ (2006) Bile acids stimulate biofilm formation in Vibrio cholera. Mol Microbiol 59: 193-201.
14. Kay WW, Phipps BM, Ishiguro EE & Trust TJ (1985) Porphyrin binding by the surface array virulence protein of Aeromonas salmonicida. J Bacteriol 164: 1332-1336.
15. Khurana R, Uyersky VN, Nielsen L & Fink AL (2001) Is Congo red an amyloid specific dye? J Biol Chem 276: 22715-22721.
16. Kimizuka R, Kato T, Hashimoto S, Yamanaka-Okada A, Okuda K & Ishihara K (2009) Congo red-binding protein in rough-phenotype Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is amyloid-like fiber. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 50: 23-29.
17. Klotz SA (1990) Role of hydrophobic interaction in microbial adhesion to plastic used in medical devices. Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity (Doyle RJ & Rosenberg M, eds), pp. 107-136. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
18. Kolter R & Watnick PI (1999) Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae E1 Tor biofilm. Mol Microbiol 34: 586-595.
19. Kruszewska K, Lan J, Lorca G, Yanagisawa N, Marklinder I & Ljungh Å (2002) Selection of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic strains by in vitro tests. Microecol Ther 29: 37-51.
20. Kubota H, Senda S, Nomura N, Tokuda H & Uchiyama H (2008) Biofilm formation by lactic acid bacteria and resistance to environmental stress. J Biosci Bioeng 106: 381-386.
21. Larsen P, Nielsen JL, Dueholm MS, Wetzel R, Otzen D & Nielsen PH (2007) Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. Environ Microbiol 9: 3077-3090.
22. Lebeer S, Verhoeven TL, Perea Velez M, Vanderleyden J & De Keersmaecker SC (2007) Impact of environmental and genetic factors on biofilm formation by the probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 6768-6775.
23. Lindahl M, Faris A, Wadstrom T & Hjerten S (1981) A new test based on 'salting out' to measure relative surface hydrophobicity of bacterial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 77: 471-476.
24. Mackenzie DA, Jeffers F, Parker ML, Vibert-Vallet A, Bongaerts RJ, Roos S, Walter J & Juge N (2010) Strain-specific diversity of mucus-binding proteins in the adhesion and aggregation properties of Lactobacillus reuteri. Microbiology 156: 3368-3378.
25. McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N, Steinberg PD & Kjelleberg S (2011) Should we stay or should we go: mechanism and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat Rev Microbiol 10: 39-50.
26. McGuckin MA, Lindén SK, Sutton P & Florin TH (2011) Mucin dynamics and enteric pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 265-278.
27. Nilsson H, Fiutka A, Moran A, Ljungh Å & Wadstrom T (2008) Biofilm formation and survival of H. pylori and enteroheptic Helicobacter species in the presence of native porcine bile and bile salts. Helicobacter 13: 410. (Abstract W8.3).
28. Palmer J, Flint S & Brooks J (2007) Bacterial cell attachment, the beginning of a biofilm. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34: 577-588.
29. Pumbwe L, Skillbeck CA, Nakano V, Avila-Campos MJ, Piazza RM & Wexler HM (2007) Bile salts enhance bacterial co-aggregation, bacterial-intestinal epitheial cell adhesion, biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance of Bacteroides fragilis. Microb Pathog 43: 78-87.
30. Qadri F, Hossain SA, Ciznár I, Haider K, Ljungh Å, Wadstrom T & Sack DA (1988) Congo red binding and salt aggregation as indicators of virulence in Shigella species. J Clin Microbiol 26: 1343-1348.
31. Reid G, Younnes JA, Van der Mei HC, Gloor GB, Knight R & Bussher HJ (2011) Microbiota restoration: natural and supplemented recovery of human microbial communities. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 27-38.
32. Romero D, Aguilar C, Losick R & Kolter R (2010) Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. P Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 2230-2234.
33. von Ossowski I, Satokari R, Reunanen J, Lebeer S, De Keersmaecker SC, Vanderleyden J, de Vos WM & Palva A (2011) Functional characterization of a mucus-specific LPXTG surface adhesin from probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol 77: 4465-4472.
34. Wadström T (1990) Hydrophobic characteristics of staphylococci: role of surface structures and role in adhesion and host colonization. Microbial Cell Surface Hydrophobicity (Doyle RJ & Rosenberg M, eds), pp. 315-333. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
35. Yildiz FH & Visick KL (2009) Vibrio biofilms: so much the same yet so different. Trends Microbiol 17: 109-118.