Integrating economic landscape valuation into Mediterranean territorial planning

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 56, Issue , 2016, Pages 120-128

  Molina, Juan Ramón ^a   Silva, Francisco Rodríguez y ^a   Herrera, Miguel Ángel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation method; Landscape assessment; Mediterranean areas; Social preferences techniques

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FOREST; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RURAL POPULATION;

EID: 84948987444     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abello R.P., Bernáldez F.G. Landscape preference and personality. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1986, 13:250-252.
2. Alados C.L., Puedo Y., Barrantes O., Escós J., Giner L., Robles A.B. Variations in landscape patterns and vegetation cover between 1957 and 1994 in a semiarid Mediterranean ecosystem. Landsc. Ecol. 2004, 19:543-559.
3. Antrop M., Van Eetvelde V. Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 50(1-3):43-58.
4. Arriaza M., Cañas-Ortega J.F., Cañas-Madueño J.A., Ruíz P. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 69(1):115-125.
5. Bateman I., Willis K., Garrod G. Consistency between contingent valuation estimates: a comparison of two studies of UK National Parks. Reg. Stud. 1994, 28(5):457-474.
6. Bishop I., Hulse D. Prediction of scenic beauty using mapped data and geographic information systems. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1994, 30:59-70.
7. Brown G., Brabyn L. An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 107(3):317-331.
8. Cardil A., Molina D., Kobziar L. Extreme temperature days and their potential impacts on southern Europe. Nat. Hazards Earth System Sci. 2014, 14:3005-3014.
9. Castellano E., Elorrieta J., García A. Valoración integral de la conservación de la biodiversidad de la Comunidad Foral de Navarra. Mapping 2001, 63:12-18.
10. Cavailhès J., Brossard T., Foltête J.C., Hilal M., Joly D., Torneux F., Tritz C., Wayresky P. GIS-Based Hedonic Pricing of Landscape. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2009, 44(4):571-590.
11. Christie M., Hanley N., Warren J., Murphy K., Wright R., Hyde T. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecol. Model. 2006, 58:304-317.
12. Chuvieco E., Aguado I., Yebra M., Nieto H., Salas J., Martín P., Vilar L., Martínez J., Martín S., Ibarra P., De la Riva J., Baeza J., Rodríguez F., Molina J.R., Herrera M.A., Zamora R. Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and Geographic Information System technologies. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:46-58.
13. Chuvieco E., Aguado I., Jurdao S., Pettinari M.L., Yebra M., Salas J., Hantson S., De la Riva J., Ibarra P., Rodriguez M., Echeverria M., Azqueta D., Román M.V., Bastarrika A., Martínez S., Recondo C., Zapico E., Martínez-Vega J. Integrating geospatial information into fire risk assessment. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2012, 25(3):606-619.
14. Chuvieco E., Martínez S., Román M.V., Hantson S., Pettinari M.L. Integration of ecological and socio-economic factors to assess global vulnerability to wildfire. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23(2):245-258.
15. Costanza R., Wilson M., Troy A., Voinov A., Liu S., D'Agostino J. The Value of New Jersey's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital 2006, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Burlington, 〈http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=iss_pub〉.
16. De Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 75(3-4):175-186.
17. De la Fuente G., Atauri J.A., De Lucio J. Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: a test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 77:393-407.
18. Fezzi C., Bateman I., Ferrini S. Using revealed preferences to estimate the Value of Travel Time to recreation sites. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2014, 67:58-70.
19. Flannigan M.D., Amiro B.D., Logan K.A., Stocks B.J., Wotton B.M. Forest fires and climate change in the 21st century. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Global Chang. 2006, 11:847-859.
20. García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Iniesta B., López C., Aguilera P., Montes C. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 19-20:136-146.
21. González M., León C. Consumption process and multiple valuation of landscape attributes. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45(2):159-169.
22. González-Cabán A., Loomis J., Rodríguez A., Hayley H. A comparison of MVC survey response rates, protests, and willingness-to-pay of native Americans and general population for fuels reduction policies. J. Forest Econ. 2007, 13:49-71.
23. Hanley N., Ready R., Colombo S., Watson F., Stewart M., Bergmann E.A. The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(3):1404-1412.
24. Hesseln H., Loomis J.B., González-Cabán A., Alexander S. Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study. J. Environ. Manag. 2003, 69(4):359-368.
25. Hunt L.M., Boxall P., Englin J., Haider W. Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis. Econ. Econ. 2005, 53:101-113.
26. Hynes S., Campbell D., Howley P. A holistic vs. an attribute-based approach to agri-environmental policy valuation: do welfare estimates differ?. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 62(2):305-329.
27. Jackson B., Pagella T., Sinclair F., Orellana B., Henshaw A., Reynolds B., Mcintyre N., Wheater H., Eycott A. Polyscape: A GIS mapping framework providing efficient and spatially explicit landscape-scale valuation of multiple ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 112:74-88.
28. Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 59(1):1-11.
29. Lee C.K., Han S.Y. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks' tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23(5):531-540.
30. Lothian A. Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1999, 44(1):177-198.
31. MacMillan D., Hanley N., Lienhoop N. Contingent valuation: environmental polling or preferente engine?. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60:299-307.
32. Molina J.R., Rodríguez-Silva F., Herrera M.A. Landscape assessment on relation to forest fire in Andalusia, Spain. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2006, 234(Suppl. 1):S249. 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.278.
33. Molina J.R., Rodríguez, Silva F., Herrera M.A., Zamora R. A simulation tool for socio-economic planning on forest fire suppression management. Forest Fires: Detection, Suppression, and Prevention 2009, 33-88. Nova Science Publishers, New York. F. Columbus (Ed.).
34. Molina J.R., Herrera M.A., Zamora R., Rodríguez, Silva F., González-Cabán A. Economic losses to Iberian swine production from forest fires. Forest Policy Econ. 2011, 13:614-621.
35. Palang H., Alumäe H., Mander U. Holistic aspects in landscape development: a scenario approach. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 50(1-3):85-94.
36. Otero I., Coord Paisaje, teledetección y SIG. Conceptos y aplicaciones 1999, Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, Madrid.
37. Manual de Ordenación de Montes de Andalucía. 2004, 356. Regional Government of Andalusia, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla.
38. Román M.V., Azqueta D., Rodrígues M. Methodological approach to assess the socio-economic vulnerability to wildfires in Spain. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2013, 294:158-165.
39. Sayadi S., González M.C., Calatrava J. Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in southeastern Spain. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:539-550.
40. Schläpfer F., Roschewitz A., Hanley N. Validation of stated preferences for public goods: a comparison of contingent valuation survey response and voting behaviour. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 51:1-16.
41. Schüpbach B., Zgraggen K., Szerencsits E. Incentives for low-input land-use types and their influence on the attractiveness of landscapes. J. Environ. Manag. 2008, 89(3):222-233.
42. Rodríguez y Silva F.R., Molina-Martínez J.R. Modeling Mediterranean forest fuels by integrating field data and mapping tools. Eur. J. Forest Res. 2012, 131:571-582.
43. Stephenson J. The Cultural Values Model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2008, 84(2):127-139.
44. Troy A., Wilson M. Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60(2):435-449.
45. Economic and Environmental Principles for Water and Related Land Resources Implementation Studies. 1983, US Water Resources Council, US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
46. US District Court of Appeals (for the District of Columbia), 1989. State of Ohio versus. US Department of Interior. Case No. 86-1575, 14-07-1989.
47. Natural resource damage assessment; final rule 1994, 59:14261-14288. US Department of Interior, Federal Register, Washington DC, 58 (March 25, 1994).
48. Vaux, H.J., Gardner, P.D., Mills, T.J., Thomas, J., 1984. Methods for assessing the impact of fire on forest recreation. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-79.
49. Walpole S.C., Sinden J.A. BCA and GIS: integration of economic and environmental indicators to aid land management decisions. Ecol. Econ. 1997, 23:45-47.