Digitization of dental alginate impression: Three-dimensional evaluation of point cloud

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 835-840

  Kim, So Ri ^a   Lee, Wan Sun ^a   Kim, Woong Chul ^a   Kim, Hea Young ^a   Kim, Ji Hwan ^a  

^a Korea University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computer analysis; Impression scanning; Laser scanner; Point cloud; Stereolithography

Indexed keywords

LASER APPLICATIONS; RUBBER; SCANNING; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY;

COMPUTER ANALYSIS; DENTAL LASERS; DIGITAL DATAS; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; LASER SCANNER; MONTREAL , CANADA; OCCLUSAL SURFACES; POINT CLOUD;

ALGINATE;

ALGINIC ACID; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID; RUBBER;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; PROCEDURES; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGINATES; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; GLUCURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACIDS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; RUBBER; SURFACE PROPERTIES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84948961744     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: 18811361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-313     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 30-36.
2. Murata H, Kawamura M, Hamada T, Chimori H, Nikawa H. Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1115-1122.
3. Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon PC. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141: 32-39.
4. Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Phillips KM. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 228-234.
5. Motohashi N, Kuroda T. A 3D computer-aided design system applied to diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 263-274.
6. Sinobad T, Obradović-Đuričić K, Nikolić Z, Dodić S, Lazić V, Sinobad V, Jesenko-Rokvić A. The effect of disinfectants on dimensional stability of addition and condensation silicone impressions. Vojnosanit Pregl 2014; 71: 251-258.
7. Wan-Son L, Woong-Chul K, Hea-Young K, Wook-Tae K, Ji-Hwan K. Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions. J Adv Prosthodont 2014; 6: 22-29.
8. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1799-1807.
9. Shah S, Sundaram G, Bartlett D, Sherriff M. The use of a 3D laser scanner using superimpositional software to assess theaccuracy of impression techniques. J Dent 2004; 32: 653-658.
10. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2000; 26: 367-374.
11. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Ko CC, Jodges JS, Douglas WH. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 78-85.
12. Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 165-172.
13. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007; 35: 903-908.
14. Kamegawa M, Nakamura M, Rukui Y, Tsutsumi S, Jojo M. Direct 3-D morphological measurements of silicone rubber impression using micro-focus X-ray CT. Dent Mater J 2010; 29: 68-74.
15. DeLong R, Heinzen M, Jodges JS, Ko CC, Douglas WH. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 438-442.
16. Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Enqlund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 929-936.
17. Flügge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzqer MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 471-478.
18. Trifkovic B, Budak I, Todorovic A, Vukelic D, Lazic V, Puskar T. Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems. Measurement 2014; 47: 45-53.
19. Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials, 10th ed. St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby, 2002; p. 332-340.
20. Rudolph H, Quaas S, Luthardt RG. Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities. Int J Comput Dent 2001; 5: 155-164.
21. No, A.S., for alginate impression material. Revised ANSI/ ADA Specification, 18-1992.
22. Association, A.D., Guide to Dental Materials and Devices ed 7. American Dental Association. Chicago 1975; p. 219-229.