Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion

World Neurosurgery

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 236-243

  Lee, Won Chul ^a   Park, Jeong Yoon ^a   Kim, Kyung Hyun ^a   Kuh, Sung Uk ^a   Chin, Dong Kyu ^a   Kim, Keun Su ^a   Cho, Yong Eun ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive; Spinal sagittal alignment; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CERVICAL SPINE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACIC SPINE; TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LORDOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 84948844759     PISSN: 18788750     EISSN: 18788769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. Harms, and H. Rolinger A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120 1982 343 347
2. J.W. Brantigan, A. Neidre, and J.S. Toohey The Lumbar I/F Cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable screw placement system: 10-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial Spine J 4 2004 681 688
3. C.D. Cole, T.D. McCall, M.H. Schmidt, and A.T. Dailey Comparison of low back fusion techniques: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2 2009 118 126
4. C.K. Lee, J.Y. Park, and H.Y. Zhang Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system: Technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 2010 219 224
5. P.C. McAfee, J.R. Regan, T. Zdeblick, J. Zuckerman, G.D. Picetti, S. Heim, and et al. The incidence of complications in endoscopic anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstructive surgery. A prospective multicenter study comprising the first 100 consecutive cases Spine 20 1995 1624 1632
6. M.F. McDonnell, S.D. Glassman, J.R. Dimar, R.M. Puno, and J.R. Johnson Perioperative complications of anterior procedures on the spine J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 1996 839 847
7. C.W. Peng, W.M. Yue, S.Y. Poh, W. Yeo, and S.B. Tan Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Spine 34 2009 1385 1389
8. K.T. Foley, and M.A. Lefkowitz Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery Clin Neurosurg 49 2002 499 517
9. Q. Jin Tao, T. Yu, W. Mei, T. Xu Dong, Z. Tian Jian, S. Guo Hua, and et al. Comparison of MIS vs. open PLIF/TLIF with regard to clinical improvement, fusion rate, and incidence of major complication: A meta-analysis Eur Spine J 24 2015 1058 1065
10. P. Park, and K.T. Foley Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: Technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up Neurosurg Focus 25 2008 E16
11. Y. Park, and J.W. Ha Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach Spine 32 2007 537 543
12. C. Seng, M.A. Siddiqui, K.P. Wong, K. Zhang, W. Yeo, S.B. Tan, and et al. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A matched-pair comparison study Spine 38 2013 2049 2055
13. T.J. Yee, S.W. Terman, F. La Marca, and P. Park Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion J Clin Neurosci 21 2014 1796 1801
14. K.T. Foley, and S.K. Gupta Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: Preliminary clinical results J Neurosurg 97 2002 7 12
15. J. Wang, Y. Zhou, Z.F. Zhang, C.Q. Li, W.J. Zheng, and J. Liu Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2 Eur Spine J 19 2010 1780 1784
16. G. Gu, H. Zhang, G. Fan, S. He, X. Cai, X. Shen, and et al. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease Int Orthop 38 2014 817 824
17. S.H. Min, and J.S. Yoo The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Eur Spine J 22 2013 1164 1172
18. U.Y. Choi, J.Y. Park, K.H. Kim, S.U. Kuh, D.K. Chin, and Y.E. Cho Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Neurosurg Focus 35 2013 E11
19. M.S. Kang, and J.Y. Park Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: Comparison between primary and revision surgery BioMed Res Int 91 2014 1 6
20. K.H. Bridwell, L.G. Lenke, K.W. McEnery, C. Baldus, and K. Blanke Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 20 1995 1410 1418
21. T. Vrtovec, M.M. Janssen, B. Likar, R.M. Castelein, M.A. Viergever, and F. Pernus A review of methods for evaluating the quantitative parameters of sagittal pelvic alignment Spine J 12 2012 433 446
22. J.S. Jang, S.H. Lee, J.H. Min, and D.H. Maeng Changes in sagittal alignment after restoration of lower lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative flat back syndrome J Neurosurg Spine 7 2007 387 392
23. M.C. Kim, H.T. Chung, D.J. Kim, S.H. Kim, and S.H. Jeon The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion Asian Spine J 5 2011 111 116
24. C. Barrey, J. Jund, O. Noseda, and P. Roussouly Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases Eur Spine J 16 2007 1459 1467
25. J.Y. Lazennec, S. Ramare, N. Arafati, C.G. Laudet, M. Gorin, B. Roger, and et al. Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: Relations between radiological parameters and pain Eur Spine J 9 2000 47 55
26. K.T. Foley, L.T. Holly, and J.D. Schwender Minimally invasive lumbar fusion Spine 28 2003 S26 35
27. D. Lau, J.G. Lee, S.J. Han, D.C. Lu, and D. Chou Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) J Clin Neurosci 18 2011 624 627
28. J.C. Lee, H. Jang, and B. Shin Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Our experience in 86 consecutive cases Spine 37 2012 1548 1557
29. B.K. Potter, B.A. Freedman, E.G. Verwiebe, J.M. Hall, D.W. Polly, and T.R. Kuklo Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients J Spinal Disord Tech 18 2009 337 346