Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 817-824

  Gu, Guangfei ^a   Zhang, Hailong ^a   Fan, Guoxin ^a   He, Shisheng ^a   Cai, Xiaobing ^a   Shen, Xiaolong ^a   Guan, Xiaofei ^a   Zhou, Xu ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Lumbar degenerative disease; Minimally invasive; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Two level

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CAGE (ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT); CAGE MIGRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE DISEASE; DURA MATER TEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARDWARE LOOSENING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG PAIN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MENINX DISORDER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TIME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; SPINAL FUSION; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84898795081     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2169-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sethi A, Lee S, Vaidya R (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw. Eur Spine J 18:430-434
2. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB (2012) Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21:2265-2270
3. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, Smith DA (2002) Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:31-38
4. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV (2001) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48:569-574, discussion 574-575
5. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA (2002) Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 49:499-517
6. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:S1-6
7. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB (2009) Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 34:1385-1389
8. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A (2010) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 1:12
9. Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhang ZF, Li CQ, Zheng WJ, Liu J (2010) Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19:1780-1784
10. Shunwu F, Xing Z, Fengdong Z, Xiangqian F (2010) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases. Spine 35:1615-1620
11. Kai Z, Wei S, Chang-Qing Z, Hua L, Wei D, You-Zhuan X, Xiao-Jiang S, Jie Z (2013) Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop 2013 Aug 6. [Epub ahead of print]
12. Gu G, Zhang H, He S, Jia J, Fu Q, Zhou X (2013) Preoperative localization methods for minimally invasive surgery in lumbar spine: comparisons between a novel method and conventional methods. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E277-277E280
13. Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2008) Biomechanics of unilateral compared with bilateral lumbar pedicle screw fixation for stabilization of unilateral vertebral disease. J Neurosurg Spine 8:44-51
14. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, Hall JM, Polly DW Jr, Kuklo TR (2005) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337-346
15. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, McEnery KW, Baldus C, Blanke K (1995) Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects. Spine 20:1410-1418
16. Harms J, Rolinger H (1982) A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120:343-347
17. Blume HG (1985) Unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion: simplified dowel technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:75-84
18. Harms JG, Jeszenszky D (1998) In Process Citation. Oper Orthop Traumatol 10:90-102
19. Taneichi H, Suda K, Kajino T, Matsumura A, Moridaira H, Kaneda K (2006) Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow-up period. J Neurosurg Spine 4:198-205
20. Branch CL Jr (1996) The case for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Neurosurg 43:252-267
21. DiPaola CP, Molinari RW (2008) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:130-139
22. German JW, Foley KT (2005) Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 30:S52-59
23. Xiao Y, Li F, Chen Q (2010) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with one cage and excised local bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:591-597
24. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, Ishihara H, Tsuji H (1999) Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 24:1023-1028
25. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A (1993) Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18:575-581
26. Weber BR, Grob D, Dvorak J, Muntener M (1997) Posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine and its effect on the multifidus muscle. Spine 22:1765-1772
27. Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V (2009) Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 33:1683-1688
28. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 28:S26-35
29. Min S, Hwang S (2009) Minimal invasive unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by sublaminar decompression - comparison to bilateral approach. J Korean Orthop Assoc 44:7682
30. Min S, Lee D (2009) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with low grade spondylolisthesis - comparison of the unilateral and bilateral approaches. J Korean Orthop Assoc 44:429435
31. Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, Laskey W, Haines D, Norbash A, Mauro MA, Goldstein JA (2009) Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. Radiology 250:538-544
32. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13761-13766
33. Thorne MC (2012) Regulating exposure of the lens of the eye to ionising radiations. J Radiol Prot 32:147-154