The multiple meanings of open government data: Understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 441-452

  Gonzalez Zapata, Felipe ^a   Heeks, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chile; Open government data; Perspectives analysis; Stakeholder analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948798193     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. AIE/OKF, Beyond Access: Open Government Data and the Right to (Re)use Public Information. 2011, Access Information Europe & Open Knowledge Foundation ( http://www.access-info.org/documents/Access_Docs/Advancing/Beyond_Access_7_January_2011_web.pdf).
2. Altman, D., Toro, S., Pineiro, R., International Influences on Democratic Transitions: The Case of Chile. Working Paper No. 86, 2008, Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
3. Aninat, C., Landregan, J., Navia, P., Vial, J., Political institutions, policymaking processes and policy outcomes in Chile. 2006, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC.
4. Axelsson, K., Melin, U., Lindgren, I., Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit: findings from a stakeholder centered analysis. Government Information Quarterly 30:1 (2013), 10–22.
5. Bailur, S., Using stakeholder theory to analyze telecenter projects. Information Technologies and International Development 3:3 (2007), 61–80.
6. Banisar, D., Freedom of Information Around the World 2006. 2006, freedominfo.org, Washington, DC.
7. Barros, A., Open data: Nuevo paradigma en el manejo de datos. Revista Bits de Ciencia 6:2 (2011), 25–28.
8. Basoalto, R., Open Government Data in Chile. (MSc thesis), 2012, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
9. Bates, J., “This is what modern deregulation looks like”: co-optation and contestation in the shaping the UK's open government data initiative. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 2012 ( http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/845/916).
10. Braunschweig, K., Eberius, J., Thiele, M., Lehner, W., The state of open data: limits of current open data platforms. Paper presented at WWW2012, Lyon, France, 16–20 Apr, 2012.
11. Bryman, A., Social Research Methods. 2001, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Bryson, J.M., What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review 6:1 (2004), 21–53.
13. Bustamante, A., Plenario de Planes de Acción para OGP. 2013, Regional Open Government Partnership Summit, Santiago, Chile ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1cNaKmIz9w).
14. Bustamante, A., Mancini, F., El Camino del gobierno abierto en Chile. Revista Bits de Ciencia 7:1 (2012), 21–25.
15. Cabinet Office, Open Data White Paper. 2012, Cabinet Office, London, UK.
16. Capgemini Consulting, The Open Data Economy. 2013, Capgemini Consulting, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
17. Castañeda, F., El superávit fiscal estructural en Chile. Políticas Públicas 1:1 (2013), 71–84.
18. Chiaretti, A., Datos abiertos (enlazados) y democratización del acceso a la información en Chile. Proceedings of 14th International Knowledge Conference, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 7–10 Jan, 2013.
19. CNC, Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública. 2009, Congreso Nacional de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
20. Concha, G., Naser, A., Datos Abiertos: Un Nuevo Desafío para los Gobiernos de la Región. 2012, ECLAC-UN, Santiago, Chile.
21. Concha, G., Naser, A., El Desafío hacia el Gobierno Abierto en la Hora de la Igualdad. 2012, ECLAC-UN, Santiago, Chile.
22. Davies, T., Open Data, Democracy and Public Sector Reform. http://www.opendataimpacts.net/report/, 2010.
23. Davies, T., Bawa, Z.A., The promises and perils of open government data. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 2012 ( http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/929/955).
24. Ding, L., Michaelis, J., McGuinness, D.L., Hendler, J., Making sense of open government data. Paper presented at Web Science Conference 2010, Raleigh, NC, 26–27 Apr, 2010.
25. Elbadawi, I.A., The state of open government data in GCC countries. Gasco, M., (eds.) Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on e-Government, 2012, Academic Publishing International, Reading, UK, 193–200.
26. Ferreiro, A., El Acceso a la Información Pública en la Agenda de OGP. 2013, Regional Open Government Partnership Summit, Santiago, Chile ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6VJcsccPVc).
27. Ferreiro, S., La promesa de los datos abiertos enlazados. Paper presented at Seminario Internacional sobre Transparencia y Probidad en el Congreso Nacional y el Sistema de Partidos Políticos, Santiago, Chile, 12 Jan, 2012 ( http://www.bcn.cl/seminarios_actividades/evento.html?h=10221.1/27056&hs=10221.1/27048).
28. Flak, L.S., Rose, J., Stakeholder governance: adapting stakeholder theory to e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16 (2005), 642–664.
29. Foundation, W.W.W., Open Government Data: Feasibility Study in Chile. 2011, World Wide Web Foundation, Washington, DC.
30. Freeman, R.E., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. 1984, Pitman Publishing, Boston, MA.
31. GDC, Plan Estratégico de Gobierno Electrónico. 2012, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago, Chile ( http://www.observatoriodigital.gob.cl/sites/default/files/plan_estrategico_gobierno_digital_2011-2014.pdf).
32. GDC, Alianza para el Gobierno Abierto: Plan Accion del Gobierno de Chile. 2012, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago, Chile ( http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/legacy_files/Chile%20National%20Plan.pdf).
33. GDC, Instructivo Presidencial Nro 5 sobre Gobierno Abierto. 2012, Gobierno de Chile, Santiago, Chile ( http://www.gobiernoabierto.cl/sites/default/files/gab.pres.ndeg005.pdf).
34. Heeks, R., Implementing and Managing eGovernment. 2006, Sage Publications, London, UK.
35. Heeks, R., Kanashiro, L.L., Remoteness, Exclusion and Telecentres in Mountain Regions: Analysing ICT-Based “Information Chains” in Pazos, Peru. IDPM Development Informatics Working Paper no.38, 2009, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
36. Heusser, F.I., Understanding OGD and Addressing Its Impact. 2013, OD4D, Santiago, Chile.
37. Hourton, A., Income Inequality in Chile: 1990–2006. GSE Discussion Paper no.E-12–004, 2012, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
38. Howard, A., No joke: open data fuels transparency, civic utility and economic activity, govfresh, 2 may. http://gov20.govfresh.com/no-joke-open-data-fuels-transparency-civic-utility-and-economic-activity/, 2012.
39. Howard, A., Data for the Public Good. 2012, O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA.
40. Huijboom, N., van den Broek, T., Open data: an international comparison of strategies. European Journal of ePractice 12:2 (2011), 1–13.
41. Inria, El Open Data se Proyecta Como una Nueva Plataforma de Negocios y una Mejor Democracia en Chile. 2013, Inria, Santiago, Chile ( http://www.ciric.cl/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Comunicado-Open-Data.pdf).
42. Janssen, K., Open government data and the right to information: opportunities and obstacles. Journal of Community Informatics 8:2 (2012), 1–11.
43. Janssen, M., Zuiderwijk, A., Infomediary business models for connecting open data providers and users. Social Science Computer Review 32:5 (2014), 694–711.
44. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A., Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management 29:4 (2012), 258–268.
45. Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K., Open government data: a stage model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Electronic Government 6846 (2011), 235–246.
46. Kassen, M., A promising phenomenon of open data. Government Information Quarterly 30:4 (2013), 508–513.
47. King, N., Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. Cassell, C., Symon, G., (eds.) Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research, 2004, Sage Publications, London, UK, 256–270.
48. King, N., Doing template analysis. Symon, G., Cassel, C., (eds.) Qualitative Organizational Research, 2012, Sage Publications, London, UK, 426–450.
49. Lathrop, D., Ruma, L., Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in practice. 2010, O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA.
50. Longo, J., #OpenData: Digital-era governance thoroughbred or new public management Trojan horse?. Public Policy and Governance Review 2:2 (2011), 38–52.
51. Luna-Reyes, L.F., Bertot, J.C., Mellouli, S., Open government, open data and digital government. Government Information Quarterly 31:1 (2014), 4–5.
52. Malamud, C., O'Reilly, T., Elin, G., Sifry, M., Holovaty, A., O'Neil, D.X., et al. Open government data principles. https://public.resource.org/8_principles.html, 2007.
53. Meijer, A.J., Curtin, D., Hillebrandt, M., Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences 78:1 (2012), 10–29.
54. Obama, B., Transparency and Open Government, presidential memorandum. 2010, The White House, Washington, DC.
55. ODA, Guidance Note on How to Do Stakeholder Analysis of Aid Projects and Programmes. 1995, Overseas Development Administration, London, UK.
56. OGP, The Case of Chile: From the Secret State to the Open State. 2012, Open Government Partnership, San Francisco, CA ( http://www.opengovpartnership.org/news/case-chile-secret-state-open-state).
57. OGP, About. 2015, Open Government Partnership, San Francisco, CA ( http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about).
58. OGP, Participating Countries. 2015, Open Government Partnership, San Francisco, CA ( http://www.opengovpartnership.org/countries).
59. OGP, Chile. 2015, Open Government Partnership, San Francisco, CA ( http://www.opengovpartnership.org/country/chile).
60. Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., Feltz, F., Interoperability of e-government information systems: issues of identification and data sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems 23:4 (2007), 29–51.
61. Oxhorn, P., Sustaining Civil Society: Economic Change, Democracy, and the Social Construction of Citizenship in Latin America. 2011, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
62. Precht, A., Huerta, H., Gobierno abierto: la experiencia de Chile. Hofmann, A., Alujas, A.R., Pereznieto, J.A.B., (eds.) La Promesa del Gobierno Abierto, 2011, ITAIP, Villahermosa, Mexico, 401–420 ( http://inicio.ifai.org.mx/Publicaciones/La%20promesa%20del%20Gobierno%20Abierto.pdf).
63. Raman, B., The rhetoric and reality of transparency. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(2), 2012 ( http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/866/909).
64. Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W., Felten, E., Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 11 (2009), 160–175.
65. Saebo, O., Flak, L.S., Sein, M.K., Understanding the dynamics in e-participation initiatives: looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly 28:3 (2011), 416–425.
66. Salcedo, C., Akoorie, M., Foreign direct investment in Chile: historical process, changing political ideologies and the responses of MNEs. AD-Minister 23 (2013), 103–129.
67. Savage, G.T., Nix, T.W., Whitehead, C.J., Blair, J.D., Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive 5:2 (1991), 61–75.
68. Scholes, K., Stakeholder mapping. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., (eds.) Exploring Public Sector Strategy, 2001, Pearson Education, Harlow, UK, 165–184.
69. Thompson, C., How information can fuel jobs, Wired, 29 Mar. http://www.wired.com/2011/03/st_thompson_free_data/, 2011.
70. Ubaldi, B., Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. 2013, OECD, Paris, France.
71. United Nations, Open Government Data for Citizen Engagement in Managing Development Guidance Toolkit. 2013, United Nations, New York, NY.
72. Vinaixa, J.P., Ley de Transparencia y Acceso a la Información Pública. Paper presented at XIV Conferencia Internacional de Bibliotecología, Santiago, Chile, 2–4 Nov, 2009 ( http://www.bibliotecarios.cl/descargas/2009/10/poblete.pdf).
73. Wilson, J.M. (2013). Informe del gobierno advierte retraso del Congreso en leyes de transparencia, La Tercera, 29 Jul.
74. World Bank, From Open Government Data to Social Accountability. 2012, World Bank, Washington, DC.
75. Wright, G., Prakash, P., Abraham, S., Shah, N., Open Government Data Study: India. 2010, Transparency & Accountability Initiative, London, UK ( http://www.transparency-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/open_data_india_final1.pdf).
76. Yehuda, G., OpenWashing doesn't really work, Being Open With You blog, 6 Jan. http://www.gilyehuda.com/2011/01/06/openwashing-doesnt-really-work/, 2011.
77. Yu, H., Robinson, D.G., The new ambiguity of “open government”. UCLA Law Review Discourse 52:11 (2012), 178–208.
78. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Impediments, challenges and recommendations for using open government data. Paper presented at Using Open Data, Brussels, Belgium, 19–20 Jun, 2012.