Squire 2.0 (standards for quality improvement reporting excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 466-473

  Ogrinc, Greg ^a   Davies, Louise ^a   Goodman, Daisy ^a   Batalden, Paul ^a   Davidoff, Frank ^a   Stevens, David ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; SAFETY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS;

CONSENSUS; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLISHING; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84948777601     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2015455     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):319-325.
2. DeVinney ed B, . Expanding Research and Evaluation Designs to Improve the Science Base for Health Care and Public Health Quality Improvement Symposium. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality. Conference Summary. Sept 15, 2005; Washington DC.
3. Shojania KG, Grimshaw JM. Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science. Health Aff. 2005; 24(1): 138-150.
4. Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME, Eccles MP, Wensing M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138.
5. Rubenstein LV, Hempel S, Farmer MM, et al. Finding order in heterogeneity: types of quality-improvement intervention publications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(6):403-408.
6. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(Suppl 1):i3-i9.
7. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff. 2002;21(5):103-111.
8. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel. Core Competencies for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice: Report of an Expert Panel. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2011.
9. American Association of Medical Colleges. Teaching for Quality. 2013. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cei/te4q/. Accessed June 21, 2013.
10. Cronenwett L, Sherwood G, Barnsteiner J, et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55(3):122-131.
11. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system-rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051-1056.
12. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, Michie S. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(3): 228-238.
13. Bate P, Robert G, Fulop N, Øvretveit J, Dixon-Woods M. Perspectives on Context. London, England: The Health Foundation; March 2014.
14. Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):13-20.
15. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(Suppl 1):i18-i23.
16. Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(7):611-617.
17. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ: Br Med J. March 2014;348:1-12.
18. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, Carter P, Dixon-Woods M. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(5):325-336.
19. Davies L, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D, Ogrinc G. The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, five years post release [published online June 18, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004116.
20. Howell V, Schwartz AE, O'Leary JD, Mc Donnell C. The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(6):400-406.
21. Stevens D. SQUIRE and the evolving science of healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 24(6):349-351.
22. Davies L, Donnelly K, Goodman D, Ogrinc G. Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: user road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0 [published online August 11, 2015]. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117.
23. Day RA. The origins of the scientific paper: the IMRaD format. J Am Med Writers Assoc. 1989;4(2):16-18.
24. Huth E. Writing and Publishing in Medicine. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
25. Baily M, Bottrell M, Lynn J, Jennings B. Special report: The ethics of using QI methods to improve health care quality and safety. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006;34(4):s1-s40.