-
1
-
-
84880808327
-
Review article: Reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature
-
O'Leary JD, Crawford MW. Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature. Can J Anaesth 2013;60:813-21.
-
(2013)
Can J Anaesth
, vol.60
, pp. 813-821
-
-
O'Leary, J.D.1
Crawford, M.W.2
-
2
-
-
84903292570
-
Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: Systematic review
-
Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, et al. Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. Brit Med J 2014;348:g3804.
-
(2014)
Brit Med J
, vol.348
, pp. g3804
-
-
Stevens, A.1
Shamseer, L.2
Weinstein, E.3
-
3
-
-
77951246592
-
Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: Reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network
-
Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med 2010;8:24.
-
(2010)
BMC Med
, vol.8
, pp. 24
-
-
Simera, I.1
Moher, D.2
Hirst, A.3
-
4
-
-
84883188092
-
Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: Interrupted time series versus before-after analysis
-
Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PloS ONE 2013;8:e64733.
-
(2013)
PloS ONE
, vol.8
, pp. e64733
-
-
Bastuji-Garin, S.1
Sbidian, E.2
Gaudy-Marqueste, C.3
-
5
-
-
33748678946
-
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved?
-
Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 2006;67:792-7.
-
(2006)
Neurology
, vol.67
, pp. 792-797
-
-
Smidt, N.1
Rutjes, A.W.2
Van Der Windt, D.A.3
-
6
-
-
0035906286
-
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation
-
Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285:1992-5.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 1992-1995
-
-
Moher, D.1
Jones, A.2
Lepage, L.3
-
7
-
-
56049102863
-
Development of the SQUIRE Publication Guidelines: Evolution of the SQUIRE project
-
Davidoff F, Batalden PB, Stevens DP, et al. Development of the SQUIRE Publication Guidelines: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008;34:681-7.
-
(2008)
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
, vol.34
, pp. 681-687
-
-
Davidoff, F.1
Batalden, P.B.2
Stevens, D.P.3
-
8
-
-
58149149658
-
Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: Evolution of the SQUIRE project
-
Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, et al. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(Suppl 1):i3-9.
-
(2008)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.17
, pp. i3-i9
-
-
Davidoff, F.1
Batalden, P.2
Stevens, D.3
-
9
-
-
27144512459
-
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The beginning of a consensus project
-
Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:319-25.
-
(2005)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.14
, pp. 319-325
-
-
Davidoff, F.1
Batalden, P.2
-
10
-
-
27144533641
-
Consensus publication guidelines: The next step in the science of quality improvement?
-
Thomson RG. Consensus publication guidelines: the next step in the science of quality improvement? Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:317-18.
-
(2005)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.14
, pp. 317-318
-
-
Thomson, R.G.1
-
11
-
-
33745193893
-
Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care
-
Baker GR. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:150-1.
-
(2006)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.15
, pp. 150-151
-
-
Baker, G.R.1
-
12
-
-
33745183748
-
Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: One step forward and two steps back
-
Pronovost P, Wachter R. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:152-3.
-
(2006)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.15
, pp. 152-153
-
-
Pronovost, P.1
Wachter, R.2
-
13
-
-
55849126054
-
The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: Explanation and elaboration
-
Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(Suppl 1):i13-32.
-
(2008)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.17
, pp. i13-i32
-
-
Ogrinc, G.1
Mooney, S.E.2
Estrada, C.3
-
18
-
-
33847342023
-
What is 'quality improvement' and how can it transform healthcare?
-
Batalden PB, Davidoff F. What is 'quality improvement' and how can it transform healthcare? Qual Saf Health Care 2007;16:2-3.
-
(2007)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.16
, pp. 2-3
-
-
Batalden, P.B.1
Davidoff, F.2
-
21
-
-
36849065071
-
The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453-7.
-
(2007)
Lancet
, vol.370
, pp. 1453-1457
-
-
Von Elm, E.1
Altman, D.G.2
Egger, M.3
-
22
-
-
58149159595
-
SQUIRE arrives-with a plan for its own improvement
-
Stevens DP, Thomson R. SQUIRE arrives-with a plan for its own improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:i1-2.
-
(2008)
Qual Saf Health Care
, vol.17
, pp. i1-i2
-
-
Stevens, D.P.1
Thomson, R.2
-
23
-
-
0036040011
-
Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature: A systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years
-
Latronico N, Botteri M, Minelli C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature: a systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1316-23.
-
(2002)
Intensive Care Med
, vol.28
, pp. 1316-1323
-
-
Latronico, N.1
Botteri, M.2
Minelli, C.3
-
24
-
-
0028908548
-
Reporting randomized controlled trials: An experiment and a call for responses from readers
-
Rennie D. Reporting randomized controlled trials: an experiment and a call for responses from readers. JAMA 1995;273:1054-5.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 1054-1055
-
-
Rennie, D.1
|