Findings from a novel approach to publication guideline revision: User road testing of a draft version of SQUIRE 2.0

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 265-272

  Davies, Louise ^a,b   Donnelly, Kyla Z ^b   Goodman, Daisy J ^a   Ogrinc, Greg ^a  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LOGIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; STATISTICS; TEACHING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; WRITING; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; FEMALE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLISHING; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84961801041     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004117     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, et al. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(Suppl 1):i3-9.
2. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:319-25.
3. Moss F, Thompson R. A new structure for quality improvement reports. Qual Health Care 1999;8:76.
4. Stevens DP, Thomson R. SQUIRE arrives-with a plan for its own improvement. Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17(Suppl 1):i1-2.
5. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, et al. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:103-11.
6. World federation for medical education global standards for quality improvement in medical education, European specifications for basic and post graduate medical education and continuing professional development. Copenhagen, Denmark: University of Copenhagen, 2007.
7. Marshall M, Pronovost P, Dixon-Woods M. Promotion of improvement as a science. Lancet 2013;381:419-21.
8. Wensing M, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare? Implement Sci 2012;7:10.
9. Davies L, Batalden P, Davidoff F, et al. The SQUIRE Guidelines: an evaluation from the field, five years post release. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:769-75.
10. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, et al. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000217.
11. Krippendorff K. Content analysis an introduction to its methodology. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
12. Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, et al. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:228-38.
13. Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, et al. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:13-20.
14. Taylor SL, Dy S, Foy R, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:611-17.
15. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014;348:g1687.
16. Portela MC, Pronovost PJ, Woodcock T, et al. How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Qual Saf 2015;24:325-36.
17. Batalden P, Davidoff F, Marshall M, et al. So what? Now what? Exploring, understanding and using the epistemologies that inform the improvement of healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20(Suppl 1):i99-105.
18. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:834-40.
19. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology 2007;18:800-4.
20. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L, et al. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285:1992-5.
21. Latronico N, Botteri M, Minelli C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature. A systematic analysis of papers published in Intensive Care Medicine over 26 years. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1316-23.
22. Smith BA, Lee HJ, Lee JH, et al. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Nurs Outlook 2008;56:31-7.
23. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 2006;185:263-7.
24. Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e64733.
25. Sinha S, Sinha S, Ashby E, et al. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:565-71 e1.
26. Latronico N, Metelli M, Turin M, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:1386-95.
27. Huber AJ, Ogrinc G, Davidoff F. SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence). In: Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, et al., ed. Guidelines for reporting health research: a user's manual. London, England: Wiley Blackwell, 2014:227-40.