Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of individual and algorithmic gatekeepers

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 751-760

  Napoli, Philip M ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Journalism; News; Public interest; Social media

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; SPACE PLATFORMS;

JOURNALISM; NEWS; PUBLIC INTEREST; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84948714219     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abbruzzese, J. (2014, July 13). Seeing more politics in your news feed? Facebook boosts partisan sites. Mashable. Retrieved from 〈http://mashable.com/2014/07/13/facebook-politics-partisan-newsfeed〉.
2. American Society of Newspaper (Eds.). (2014). Statement of principles. Retrieved from 〈http://asne.org/content.asp?pl=24&sl=171&contentid=171〉.
3. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2014). A liminal press: Situating news app designers within a field of networked news production. Digital Journalism http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.922322.
4. Andrejevic, M. (2013). Public service media utilities: Rethinking search engines and social networking as public goods. Media International Australia, 146, 123-132.
5. Ball, J. (2014, August 21). Twitter: From free speech champion to selective censor? The Guardian. Retrieved from 〈http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/aug/21/twitter-free-speech-champion-selective-censor〉.
6. Barkin, S. M. (2002). American television news: The media marketplace and the public interest. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
7. Bastos, M. T. (2014). Shares, pins, and tweets. Journalism Studies, 101080/1461670X.2014.891857.
8. Bell, E. (2014, August 31). We can't let tech giants, like Facebook and Twitter, control our news values. The Guardian. Retrieved from 〈http://www.theguardian.com/media/media-blog/2014/aug/31/tech-giants-facebook-twitter-algorithm-editorial-values〉.
9. Benkler, Y. (2007). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. Bollier, D. (2002). In search of the public interest in the new media environments. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
11. Braun, J., & Gillespie, T. (2011). Hosting the public discourse, hosting the public: When online news and social media converge. New Media & Society, 5(4), 383-398.
12. Carr, D. (2011, March 20). The evolving mission of Google. New York Times. Retrieved from 〈http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/business/media/21carr.html?-r=0〉.
13. Copeland, R. (2011). Tweet all about it: Social media and the news revolution. Metro Magazine, 169, 96-100.
14. Communications Act of 1934. (1934). Pub. L. No. 416, 48 Stat. 1064.
15. Council of Europe (2009). Public service media governance: Looking to the future. Report prepared for the First Council of Europe Conference of Ministers Responsible for Media and New Communication Services. Retrieved from 〈http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/doc/PSMgovernance-en.pdf〉.
16. Council of Europe (2012). Recommendation CM/Rec (2012) 4 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the protection of human rights with regard to social networking services. Retrieved from 〈https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1929453〉.
17. Deutch, L., & Lee, J. (2014, August 14). No filter: Social media show raw view of #Ferguson. USA Today. Retrieved from 〈http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/08/14/social-media-ferguson-effect/14052495/〉.
18. Diakopoulos, N. (2014). Algorithmic accountability reporting: Investigation of black boxes. Two/Knight Brief, Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Retrieved from 〈http://towcenter.org/algorithmic-accountability-2/〉.
19. Dredge, S. (2014, March 10). Strictly algorithm: How news finds people in the Facebook and Twitter age. The Guardian. Retrieved from 〈http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/mar/10/journalism-democracy-algorithms-facebook-google-twitter〉.
20. Electronic Privacy Information Center (n.d.). In the matter of Facebook, Inc., complaint, request for investigation, injunction, and other relief. Retrieved from 〈http://epic.org/privacy/ftc/facebook/Facebook-Study-Complaint.pdf〉.
21. Facebook (2014). About Facebook. Retrieved from 〈https://www.facebook.com/facebook/info〉.
22. Federal Communications Commission (1949). Editorializing by broadcast licensees. 13 FCC 1246.
23. Foster, R. (2012). News plurality in a digital world. Oxford, UK: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
24. Fowler, M. S., & Brenner, D. L. (1982). A marketplace approach to broadcast regulation. Texas Law Review, 60, 1-51.
25. Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge, UK: Policy.
26. Gallop, J. D. (2014, July 27). Social media spreads message of Israel-Hamas conflict. USA Today. Retrieved from 〈http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/07/27/social-media-israel-hamas-conflict/13239003/〉.
27. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of "platforms". New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364.
28. Gillespie, T. (2014, July 4). Facebook's algorithm - why our assumptions are wrong, and our concerns are right. Culture Digitally. Retrieved from 〈http://culturedigitally.org/2014/07/facebooks-algorithm-why-our-assumptions-are-wrong-and-our-concerns-are-right/〉.
29. Gillmor, D. (2014, August 22). The new editors of the Internet. The Atlantic. Retrieved from 〈http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/08/the-new-editors-of-the-internet/378983/〉.
30. Ginosar, A. (2013). Media governance: A conceptual framework or merely a buzzword?. Communication Theory, 23, 356-374, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12026.
31. Goode, L. (2010). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1287-1305, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144809341393.
32. Greenwald, G. (2014, August 21). Should Twitter, Facebook, and Google executives be the arbiters of what we see and read? The Intercept. Retrieved from 〈https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/08/21/twitter-facebook-executives-arbiters-see-read/〉.
33. Hasebrink, U. (2012). The role of the audience within media governance: The neglected dimension of media literacy. Media Studies, 3(6), 58-73.
34. Helberger, N. (2008). From eyeball to creator - toying with audience empowerment in the Audiovisual Media Services Directive. Entertainment Law Review, 6, 128-137.
35. Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend: Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 815-824, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430.
36. Holcomb, J. (2014, August 25). Where was Ferguson in my Facebook feed? Pew Research Center. Retrieved from 〈http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/25/where-was-ferguson-in-my-facebook-feed-2/〉.
37. Hundt, R. E. (1996). The public's airwaves: What does the public interest require of television broadcasters. Duke Law Journal, 45, 1089-1129.
38. Iggers, J. (1999). Good news, badnews: Journalism ethics and the public interest. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Johnson, M. (2013, January 23). The history of Twitter. Socialnomics. Retrieved from 〈http://www.socialnomics.net/2013/01/23/the-history-of-twitter/〉.
40. Ju, A., and Jeong., S. H., & Chyi, H. I. (2014). Will social media save newspapers: Examining the effectiveness of Facebook and Twitter as news platforms. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 1-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.794022.
41. Karppinen, K. (2012). Rethinking media pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.
42. Karppinen, K., & Moe, H. (2013). Acritiqueof "media governance.". In M. Loblich, & S. Pfaff-Rudiger (Eds.), Communication and media policy in the era of the Internet (pp. 69-80). Nomos: Baden-Baden.
43. Kramer, A. D. I., and Guillory., J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(29), 8788-8790.
44. Langlois, G. (2013). Participatory culture and the new governance of communication: The paradox of participatory media. Television & New Media, 14, 91-105, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527476411433519.
45. Lievens, E., Valcke, P., & Jan Valgaeren, P. (2011). Start of the art on regulatory trends in media: Identifying whether, what, and how and who to regulate in social media. Report prepared for EMSOC.
46. MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the networked: The worldwide struggle for Internet freedom. New York: Basic Books.
47. McGee, M. (2014, February 28). Facebook cuts into Google's lead as top traffic driver to online news sites. Marketing Land. Retrieved from 〈http://marketingland.com/facebook-cuts-googles-lead-top-traffic-driver-online-news-sites-report-75578〉.
48. McMains, A. (2012, March 27). Is Facebook a media or tech company? Adweek. Retrieved from 〈http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/facebook-media-or-tech-company-139242〉.
49. McNeal, G. S. (2014, June 30). Controversy over Facebook emotional manipulation study grows and timeline becomes more clear. Forbes. Retrieved from 〈http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2014/06/30/controversy-over-facebook-emotional-manipulation-study-grows-as-timeline-becomes-more-clear〉
50. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Mitchell, A., & Rosenstiel, T., & Christian, L (2013). What Facebook and Twitter mean for news. State of the News Media 2012. Retrieved from 〈http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/mobile-devices-and-news-consumption-some-good-signs-for-journalism/what-facebook-and-twitter-mean-for-news/〉.
52. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: PublicAffairs.
53. Morrison, D., & Svennevig, M. (2002). The public interest, the media, and privacy. Report prepared for the British Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved from 〈http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/bsc/pdfs/research/pidoc.pdf〉.
54. Moss, C. (2013, October 3). Twitter just filed for its IPO and its mission statement is super short. Business Insider. Retrieved from 〈http://www.businessinsider.com/dick-costolo-twitter-ipo-2013-10〉.
55. Napoli, P. M. (2001). Foundations of communications policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
56. Napoli, P. M. (2005). Media management and the public interest. In A. Albrarran, S. Chan-Olmsted, & M. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 275-295). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Napoli, P. M. (2009). Public interest media advocacy and activism as a social movement. Communication Yearbook, 33, 385-429.
58. Napoli, P. M. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
59. Napoli, P. M. (2014a). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24, 340-360, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12039.
60. Napoli, P. M. (2014b). Measuring media impact: An overview of the field. Report prepared for the Norman Lear Center, University of Southern California. Retrieved from 〈http://www.learcenter.org/pdf/measuringmedia.pdf〉.
61. Napoli, P. M., & Karppinen, K. (2013). Translating diversity to Internet governance. First Monday, 12(2))http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i12.4307.
62. Nielsen, R. K., & Schr Öder, K. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 472-489, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.872420.
63. Newman, N. (2009). The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Working Paper.
64. Nolan, D., & Marjoribanks, T (2011). "Public editors" and media governance at the Guardian and the New York Times. Journalism Practice, 5(1), 3-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2010.482764.
65. Papandrea, F., & Armstrong, M. (2008). Record of the communications policy & research forum 2008. Sydney, Australia: Network Insight Institute.
66. Peterson, T (1963). The social responsibility theory. In F. Siebert, T. Peterson, & W Schramm (Eds.), Four theories of the press (pp. 73-105). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
67. Pew Research Center (2014). Social, search & direct: Pathways to digital news. Retrieved from 〈http://www.journalism.org/2014/03/13/social-search-direct/social-search-and-direct-pathways-to-digital-news-copy-edited/〉.
68. Puppis, M. (2010). Media governance: A new concept for the analysis of media policy and regulation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 3, 134-149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01063.x.
69. Radio and Television News Directors Association (2004). Code of ethics. Retrieved from 〈http://www.rtdna.org/content/rtdna-code-of-ethics#.VEmrt-nF98E〉.
70. Rahimi, B. (2011). The agonistic social media: Cyberspace in the formation of dissent and consolidation of state power in post-election Iran. The Communication Review, 14, 158-178, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597240.
71. Rubel, S. (2012, March 4). Five companies steer all news. paid Content. Retrieved from 〈http://gigaom.com/2012/03/04/419-five-companies-steer-all-news/〉.
72. Schulz, W., Schmidt, J., Ladeur, K., Elkin-Koren, N., Zarsky, T., & Mesch, G. S. (2011). Mapping the frontiers of governance in social media. Report prepared for the 1st Berlin Symposium on Internet and Society. Retrieved from 〈http://berlinsymposium.org/sites/berlinsymposium.org/files/social-media-governance-0.pdf〉.
73. Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55-73, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144813477833.
74. Society of Professional Journalists (2014). Code of ethics. Retrieved from 〈http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp〉.
75. Stein, L. (2013). Policy and participation on social media: The cases of YouTube, Facebook, and Wikipedia. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6, 353-371, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12026.
76. Stone, B. (2008, May 9). Facebook agrees to devise tools to protect young users. New York Times. Retrieved from 〈http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/09/technology/09face.html?-r=0〉.
77. Stroud, N., and Scacco., J. M., & Curry, A. L. (2014). Interactive features in online news. Report from the Engaging News Project. Retrieved from 〈http://engagingnewsproject.org/enp-2014/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ENP-News-Site-Analysis.pdf〉.
78. Sunstein, C. R. (2000). Television and the public interest. University of California Law Review, 88, 499-564.
79. Taylor, A. (2014). The people's platform: Taking back power and culture in the digital age. New York: Metropolitan Books.
80. Thierer, A. (2012). The perils of classifying social media platforms as public utilities. Mercatus Center White Paper.
81. Thompson, B. (2014, August 12). Is BuzzFeed a tech company? Stratechery. Retrieved from 〈http://stratechery.com/2014/buzzfeed-tech-company/〉.
82. Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance, and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7). Retrieved from 〈http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4901/4097〉. doi:10.5210/fm.v19i7.4901.
83. Ulanoff, L. (2014, January 30). Facebook Paper is content - but don't call Facebook a media company. Mashable. Retrieved from 〈http://mashable.com/2014/01/30/facebook-paper-app-analysis/〉.
84. Webster, J. G. (2010). User information regimes: How social media shape patterns of consumption. Northwestern University Law Review, 104(2), 593-612.
85. Weeks, B. E., & Holbert, R. L. (2013). Predicting dissemination of news content in social media: A focus on reception, friending, and partisanship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(2), 212-232, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699013482906.
86. Youmans, W. L., & York, J. (2012). Social media and the activist toolkit: User agreements, corporate interests, and the information infrastructure of modern social movements. Journal of Communication, 62, 315-329, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01636.x.
87. Zakrzewski, C. (2014, July 23). Twitter's diversity report is more of the same. TechCrunch. Retrieved from 〈http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/23/twitters-diversity-report-is-more-of-the-same/〉.