Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study

European Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 184-190

  Lång, Kristina ^a   Andersson, Ingvar ^a   Rosso, Aldana ^b   Tingberg, Anders ^a   Timberg, Pontus ^a   Zackrisson, Sophia ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer; Diagnostic Imaging; Mammography; Screening; Women Health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH SURVEY; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SWEDEN; X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWEDEN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY;

EID: 84948711103     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786
2. Laming D, Warren R (2000) Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms. J Med Screen 7:24–30
3. Bochud FO, Valley JF, Verdun FR et al (1999) Estimation of the noisy component of anatomical backgrounds. Med Phys 26:1365–1370
4. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC et al (2003) Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 138:168–175
5. Baker JA, Lo JY (2011) Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. Acad Radiol 18:1298–310
6. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE et al (1997) Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399–406
7. Houssami N, Skaane P (2013) Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast 22:101–108
8. Lei J, Yang P, Zhang L et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 24:595–602
9. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817–2825
10. Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D et al (2012) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol 85:e1074–82
11. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D et al (2013) Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 14:583–589
12. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R et al (2013) Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 267:47–56
13. Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J et al (2013) Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiology 269:694–700
14. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL et al (2014) Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 311:2499–507
15. The National Board of Health and Welfare. (2007) [The National Guidelines for breast-, colorectal and prostate cancer]. Stockholm, Sweden. Available via http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/nationellariktlinjerforbrostprostatatjocktarmsochandtarmscancervard. Accessed 9 Sep 2014
16. Van Engen R, Bouwman R, Dance D, Heid P, Lazzari B, Marshall N, Schopphoven S, Strudley C, Thjissen M, Young K BH (2013) Protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of digital breast tomosynthesis system. EUREF, European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
17. Hemdal B (2011) Forward-scattered radiation from the compression paddle should be considered in glandular dose estimations. Radiat Prot Dosim 147:196–201
18. Mertelmeier T (2006) Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device. Proc SPIE. doi:10.1117/12.651380
19. Förnvik D, Andersson I, Svahn T, et al. The effect of reduced breast compression in breast tomosynthesis: human observer study using clinical cases. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 139:118–23
20. D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Morris EASEA (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
21. Sullivan M (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, pp 230–233
22. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832
23. Förnvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240–247
24. Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ et al (2006) Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1377–1380
25. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C et al (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition—summary document. Ann Oncol 19:614–622
26. Lundgren B, Helleberg A (1982) Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 68:351–355
27. Dustler M, Förnvik D, Timberg P, Tingberg A (2013) A Study of the Feasibility of using slabbing to reduce Tomosynthesis Review Time. Proc SPIE. doi:10.1117/12.2006987
28. Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A et al (2006) Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:774–82