Diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography for benign and malignant lesions in breasts: A meta-analysis

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 595-602

  Lei, Junqiang ^a   Yang, Pin ^a   Zhang, Li ^a   Wang, Yinzhong ^a   Yang, Kehu ^a  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Mammography; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOMOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEOPLASMS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84896729545     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3012-x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Breast Cancer (2009) Breast Cancer in Young Women WebMD. Retrieved 9 September 2009. Available from www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/guide/breast-cancer- young-women
2. Chow LW, Yip AY, Ng EL (2012) Prevention of oncological diseases: primary and secondary prevention. Int J Biol Markers 27:e337-e343
3. Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S et al (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18:2817-2825
4. Skaane P, Gullien R, Bjorndal H et al (2012) Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 53:524-529
5. Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D (2010) Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review. Am J Roentgenol 195:5
6. Gennaro G, Toledano A, di Maggio C et al (2010) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol 20:1545-1553
7. Park JM, Franken EA Jr, Garg M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT (2007) Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. Radiogr Suppl 1:S231-S240
8. Thibault F, Dromain C et al (2013) Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study. Eur Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2863-5
9. Teertstra HJ, Loo CE, van den Bosch MA et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results. Eur Radiol 20:16-24
10. Tagliafico A, Astengo D, Cavagnetto F, Calabrese M et al (2012) One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis. Eur Radiol 22:539-544
11. Chan HP, Wei J, Zhang Y et al (2008) Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 35:4087-4095
12. Good WF, Abrams GS, Catullo VJ et al (2008) Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. Am J Roentgenol 190:865-869
13. Hackshaw AK, Law MR, Wald NJ (1997) The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ Brit Med J 315:980-988
14. Tian JH (2010) Systematic review of Diagnosis text accuracy. In: Yang KH (ed) System evaluation Guideline. People's Medical Publishing House, Beijin, pp 191-195
15. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529-536
16. Zhang TS, Zhong WZ (2008) Meta-DiSc software in meta-analysis of diagnostic test. J Evid Based Med 8:97-108
17. Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM (2008) Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 149:889-897
18. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A (2006) Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:31
19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ Brit Med J 327:557-560
20. Bowden J, Tierney JF et al (2011) Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:41
21. Liu PL, Tang SS (2011) Contrast enhanced ultrasound and contrast enhanced CT for diagnosis of focal pancreas lesions: a meta-analysis. Chin J Med Image Technol 27:2265-2269
22. Sterne JA, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1046-1055
23. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors) (2011) Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org
24. Gur D, Abrams GS, Chough DM et al (2009) Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:586-591
25. Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK et al (2012) comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol 67:976-981
26. Svahn TM, Chakraborty DP, Ikeda D et al (2012) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Br J Radiol 85:e1074-e1082
27. Svane G, Azavedo E, Lindman K et al (2011) Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography. Acta Radiol 52:134-142
28. Tejerina Bernal A, Rabadan Doreste F et al (2012) Breast imaging: how we manage diagnostic technology at a multidisciplinary breast center. J Oncol 2012:213421
29. Smith A (2005) Full-field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manag 27:25-31
30. Rafferty EA (2007) Digital mammography: novel applications. Radiol Clin N Am 45:831-843, vii
31. Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM (2007) Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:616-623
32. Fornvik D, Zackrisson S, Ljungberg O et al (2010) Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol 51:240-247
33. Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH et al (2011) Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:320-324