Impact of an intra-cycle motion correction algorithm on overall evaluability and diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography

European Radiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 147-156

  Pontone, Gianluca ^a   Andreini, Daniele ^a,b   Bertella, Erika ^a   Baggiano, Andrea ^a   Mushtaq, Saima ^a   Loguercio, Monica ^a   Segurini, Chiara ^a   Conte, Edoardo ^a   Beltrama, Virginia ^a   Annoni, Andrea ^a   Formenti, Alberto ^a   Petullà, Maria ^a   Guaricci, Andrea I ^c   Montorsi, Piero ^a,b   Trabattoni, Daniela ^a   Bartorelli, Antonio L ^a,b   Pepi, Mauro ^a  

^a CENTRO CARDIOLOGICO MONZINO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FOGGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Cardiac computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Intra cycle motion correction algorithm; Motion artefacts

Indexed keywords

IOMEPROL;

AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LIKERT SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; MOTION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84948711011     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3793-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents, Mark DB, Berman DS, Budoff MJ et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 121:2509–2543
2. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:346–355
3. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2012) Radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography for the detection of significant coronary artery stenoses: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 160:155–164
4. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557
5. Dewey M, Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A et al (2010) Patient characteristics as predictors of image quality and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT compared with conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery stenoses: CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:93–102
6. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al (2006) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 241:378–385
7. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S et al (2006) Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 238:75–86
8. Apfaltrer P, Walter T, Gruettner J et al (2013) Prediction of adverse clinical outcome in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of high-sensitivity troponin I and quantitative CT parameters. Eur J Radiol 82:563–567
9. Horiguchi J, Nakanishi T, Tamura A, Ito K, Sasaki K, Shen Y (2002) Technical innovation of cardiac multirow detector CT using multisector reconstruction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 26:217–226
10. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268
11. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al (2008) 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94:1386–1393
12. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Hague CJ et al (2012) Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:164–171
13. Fuchs TA, Stehli J, Dougoud S et al (2014) Impact of a new motion-correction algorithm on image quality of low-dose coronary CT angiography in patients with insufficient heart rate control. Acad Radiol 21:312–317
14. Pontone G, Andreini D, Bartorelli AL et al (2012) Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering coronary MDCT angiography. Clin Radiol 67:207–215
15. Hsieh J, Londt J, Vass M, Li J, Tang X, Okerlund D (2006) Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 33:4236–4248
16. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J (2007) A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34:4526–4544
17. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40
18. Pflederer T, Rudofsky L, Ropers D et al (2009) Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1045–1050
19. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dualenergy scanning. Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889
20. Rao JN, Scott AJ (1992) A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 48:577–585
21. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 234:86–97
22. Lu B, Mao SS, Zhuang N et al (2001) Coronary artery motion during the cardiac cycle and optimal ECG triggering for coronary artery imaging. Investig Radiol 36:250–256
23. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:911–916
24. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F et al (2006) Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Investig Radiol 41:436–442
25. Caussin C, Larchez C, Ghostine S et al (2006) Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 98:871–876
26. Flohr TG, Raupach R, Bruder H (2009) Cardiac CT: how much can temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and volume coverage be improved? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:143–152
27. Tang J, Hsieh J, Chen GH (2010) Temporal resolution improvement in cardiac CT using PICCS (TRI-PICCS): performance studies. Med Phys 37:4377–4388
28. Andreini D, Pontone G, Ballerini G et al (2007) Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in 500 consecutive patients: critical role of heart rate. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23:789–801
29. Guaricci AI, Schuijf JD, Cademartiri F et al (2012) Incremental value and safety of oral ivabradine for heart rate reduction in computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol 156:28–33
30. Guaricci AI, Maffei E, Brunetti ND et al (2013) Heart rate control with oral ivabradine in computed tomography coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of 7.5 mg vs 5 mg regimen. Int J Cardiol 168:362–368
31. Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A et al (2008) Randomized comparison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:177–186
32. Shapiro MD, Pena AJ, Nichols JH et al (2008) Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 66:37–41
33. Greuter MJ, Flohr T, van Ooijen PM et al (2007) A model for temporal resolution of multidetector computed tomography of coronary arteries in relation to rotation time, heart rate and reconstruction algorithm. Eur Radiol 17:784–812
34. Wicky S, Rosol M, Hamberg LM et al (2002) Evaluation of retrospective multisector and half scan ECG-gated multidetector cardiac CT protocols with moving phantoms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:768–776
35. Herzog C, Nguyen SA, Savino G et al (2007) Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology 244:121–129
36. Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S et al (2009) Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 253:672–680
37. Horii Y, Yoshimura N, Hori Y et al (2011) Relationship between heart rate and optimal reconstruction phase in dual-source CT coronary angiography. Acad Radiol 18:726–730
38. Srichai MB, Lim RP, Donnino R et al (2012) Low-dose, prospective triggered high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with retrospective spiral technique. Acad Radiol 19:554–561
39. Newell JD Jr, Fuld MK, Allmendinger T et al (2015) Very low-dose (0.15 mGy) chest CT protocols using the COPDGene 2 test object and a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with corresponding third-generation iterative reconstruction software. Investig Radiol 50:40–45