Effect of a novel vendor-specific motion-correction algorithm on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in persons undergoing coronary CT angiography without rate-control medications

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 164-171

  Leipsic, Jonathon ^a   Labounty, Troy M ^b   Hague, Cameron J ^a   Mancini, G B John ^a   O'Brien, Julie M ^a   Wood, David A ^a   Taylor, Carolyn M ^a   Cury, Ricardo C ^c   Earls, James P ^d   Heilbron, Brett G ^a   Ajlan, Amr M ^a   Feuchtner, Gudrun ^c   Min, James K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BAPTIST CARDIAC AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d Fairfax Radiology and Inova Heart Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary CT angiography; Diagnostic accuracy; Technologic advancements; Temporal resolution

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOTION CORRECTION ALGORITHM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANTI-ARRHYTHMIA AGENTS; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INDUSTRY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84862003667     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: 1876861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., Gitter M., Sutherland J., Halamert E., Scherer M., Bellinger R., Martin A., Benton R., Delago A., Min J.K. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1724-1732.
2. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M., Arbab-Zadeh A., Niinuma H., Gottlieb I., Paul N., Clouse M.E., Shapiro E.P., Hoe J., Lardo A.C., Bush D.E., de Roos A., Cox C., Brinker J., Lima J.A. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:2324-2336.
3. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., Poon M., Hendel R.C., Carr J.C., Gerstad N.A., Gillam L.D., Hodgson J.M., Kim R.J., Kramer C.M., Lesser J.R., Martin E.T., Messer J.V., Redberg R.F., Rubin G.D., Rumsfeld J.S., Taylor A.J., Weigold W.G., Woodard P.K., Brindis R.G., Hendel R.C., Douglas P.S., Peterson E.D., Wolk M.J., Allen J.M., Patel M.R. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475-1497. American College of cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group; Amiercan College of Radiology; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography; Society for Cardiovascular Magentic Resonance; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; North American Society for Cardiac Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology.
4. Achenbach S. Computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1919-1928.
5. Leschka S., Wildermuth S., Boehm T., Desbiolles L., Husmann L., Plass A., Koepfli P., Schepis T., Marincek B., Kaufmann P.A., Alkadhi H. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006, 241:378-385.
6. Hoffmann M.H., Shi H., Manzke R., Schmid F.T., De Vries L., Grass M., Brambs H.J., Aschoff A.J. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005, 234:86-97.
7. Herzog C., Arning-Erb M., Zangos S., Eichler K., Hammerstingl R., Dogan S., Ackermann H., Vogl T.J. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006, 238:75-86.
8. Ghostine S., Caussin C., Daoud B., Habis M., Perrier E., Pesenti-Rossi D., Sigal-Cinqualbre A., Angel C.Y., Lancelin B., Capderou A., Paul J.F. Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1929-1934.
9. Wintersperger B.J., Nikolaou K., von Ziegler F., Johnson T., Rist C., Leber A., Flohr T., Knez A., Reiser M.F., Becker C.R. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006, 41:436-442.
10. Brodoefel H., Reimann A., Burgstahler C., schumacher F., Herberts T., Tsiflikas I., Shroeder S., Claussen C.D., Kopp A.F., Heuschmid M. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2008, 66:134-141.
11. Poon M. Technology insight: cardiac CT angiography. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2006, 3:265-275.
12. Gerber T.C., Breen J.F., Kuzo R.S., Kantor B., Williamson E.E., Safford R.E., Morin R.L. Computed tomographic angiography of the coronary arteries: techniques and applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2006, 27:42-55. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.
13. Abbara S., Arbab-Zadeh A., Callister T.Q., Desai M.Y., Mamuya W., Thomson L., Weigold W.G. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:190-204.
14. Achenbach S., Ropers U., Kuettner A., Anders K., Pflederer T., Komatsu S., Bautz W., Daniel W.G., Ropers D. Randomized comparison of 64-slice single and dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:177-186.
15. Weinreb J.C., Larson P.A., Woodard P.K., Standford W., Rubin G.D., Stillman A.E., Bluemke D.A., Duerinckx A.J., Dunnick N.R., Smith G.G. American College of Radiology clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging. Radiology 2005, 235:723-727. American College of Radiology.
16. Budoff M.J., Cohen M.C., Garcia M.J., Hodgson J., Hundley W.G., Lima J.A., Manning W.F., Pohost G.M., Raggi P.M., Rodgers G.P., Rumberger J.A., Taylor A.J., Creager M.A., Hirshfeld J.W., Lorell B.H., Merli G., Rodgers G.P., Tracy C.M., Weitz H.H. ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:383-402. American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association; American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training; American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, [Errata in J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2378; and J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2463].
17. Chow B.J., Freeman M.R., Bowen J.M., Levin L., Hopkins R.B., Provost Y., Tarride J.E., Dennie C., Cohen E.A., Marcuzzi D., Iwanochko R., Moody A.R., Paul N., Parker J.D., O'Reilly D.J., Xie F., Goeree R. Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 2011, 171:1021-1028.
18. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. Appendix C: European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Report no. EUR 16262 EN. Contract no. FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004.
19. Pontone G., Andreini D., Bartorelli A.L., Annoni A., Mushtag S., Bertella E., Formenti A., Cortinovis S., Alamanni F., Fusari M., Bona V., Tamborini G., Muratori M., Ballerini G., Fiorentini C., Biglioli P., Pepi M. Feasibility and accuracy of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography acquisition for patients referred for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am Heart J 2011, 161:1106-1113.
20. Abdulla J., Abildstrom S.Z., Gotzsche O., Christensen E., Kobert L., Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007, 28:3042-3050.
21. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:552-557.
22. Shreibati J., Baker L., Hlatky M. Association of coronary CT angiography or stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2011, 306:2128-2136.