Prototyping dynamics: Sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results

Design Thinking Research: Measuring Performance in Context

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 47-70

  Dow, Steven P ^a   Fortuna, Julie ^a   Schwartz, Dan ^a   Altringer, Beth ^b   Schwartz, Daniel L ^a   Klemmer, Scott R ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948455577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Arkes HR, BlumerC. C(1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 35 (1):124-140 (1985) The psychology of sunk cost. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 35 (1):124-140.
2. Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D (1992) Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol 63(4):596-612.
3. Aronson E, Bridgeman D, Geffner R (1978) Interdependent interactions and prosocial behavior. J Res Dev Educ 12(1):16-27.
4. Ball LJ, Ormerod TC (1995) Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 43(1):131-151.
5. Bao P, Gerber E, Gergle D, Hoffman D (2010) Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm. In: Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 1233-1236.
6. Ben-David I, Graham JR, Harvey CR (2007) Managerial overconfidence and corporate policies. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series no. 13711.
7. Brandt J, Dontcheva M, Weskamp M, Klemmer SR (2010) Example-centric programming: integrating web search into the development environment. In: Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 513-522.
8. Brereton M, Cannon M, Mabogunje A, Leifer L, Brereton M, Cannon M, Mabogunje A, Leifer L (1996) Collaboration in design teams: how social interaction shapes the product. In: Analyzing design activity. Wiley, Chichester.
9. Buxton B (2007) Sketching user experiences: getting the design right and the right design. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam.
10. Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: an overview. Des Stud 25(5):427-441.
11. Curhan JR, Elfenbein HA, Xu H (2006) What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation. J Pers Soc Psychol 91(3):493-512.
12. Dannels DP, Martin KN (2008) Critiquing critiques: a genre analysis of feedback across novice to expert design studios. J Bus Tech Commun 22(2):135-159.
13. Davidoff S, Lee MK, Dey AK, Zimmerman J (2007) Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. In: Proceedings of conference on ubiquitous computing, Innsbruck.
14. Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle. J Pers Soc Psychol 53(3):497-509.
15. Dow SP, Heddleston K, Klemmer SR (2009) The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on creativity and cognition, ACM, New York, pp 165-174.
16. Dow S, Glassco A, Kass J, Schwarz M, Schwartz DL, Klemmer SR (2010) Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. Trans Comput- Hum Int, Article 18, 17(4):24.
17. Dweck C (2007) Mindset: the new psychology of success. Ballantine Books, New York Ericsson KA, Smith J (1991) Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Ericsson KA, Smith J (1991) Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Fauconnier G, Turner M (2003) The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic Books, New York.
20. Felps W, Mitchell T, Byington E (2006) How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Res Organ Behav 27:175-222.
21. Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1996) Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Gaver WW, Beaver J, Benford S (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 233-240.
23. Gerber E (2010) Prototyping practice in context: the psychological experience in a high tech firm. J Des Stud.
24. Hampton JA (1987) Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions. Mem Cognit 15 (1):55-71.
25. Hartmann B, Yu L, Allison A, Yang Y, Klemmer SR (2008) Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. In: Proceedings of the conference on user interface software and technology, ACM, New York, pp 91-100.
26. Herzog SM, Hertwig R (2009) The wisdom of many in one mind. Psychol Sci 20(2):231-237.
27. Hyland F, Hyland K (2001) Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. J Second Lang Writ 10(3):185-212.
28. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79(6):995-1006.
29. Janis IL (1982) Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Wadsworth, New York.
30. Jansson D, Smith S (1991) Design fixation. Des Stud 12(1):3-11 Kershaw TC, Ohlsson S (2004) Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(1):3-13.
31. Kohavi R, Longbotham R (2007) Online experiments: lessons learned. Computer 40:103-105.
32. Kosara R (2007) Visualization criticism - the missing link between information visualization and art. In: Proceedings of the conference on information visualization. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 631-636.
33. Larrick RP (2009) Broaden the decision frame to make effective decisions. In: Locke E (ed) Handbook of principles of organizational behavior. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
34. Lee B, Srivastava S, Kumar R, Brafman R, Klemmer SR (2010) Designing with interactive example galleries. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 2257-2266.
35. Leifer L (2010) Dancing with ambiguity: design thinking in theory and practice. http://hci. stanford.edu/courses/cs547/speaker.php?date=2010-04-09.
36. Mark G, Gonzalez VM, Harris J (2005) No task left behind?: examining the nature of fragmented work. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems, Portland, pp 321-330.
37. Marsh RL, Landau JD, Hicks JL (1996) How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Mem Cognit 24(5):669-680.
38. Moran TP, Carroll JM (1996) Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use. CRC Press, Mahwah, NJ.
39. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175-220.
40. Nielsen J, Faber JM (1996) Improving system usability through parallel design. Computer 29(2):29-35.
41. Ranganath R, Jurafsky D, McFarland D (2009) It's not you, it's me: detecting flirting and its misperception in speed-dates. In: Proceedings of conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 334-342.
42. Schon DA (1995) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Ashgate, Aldershot.
43. Schrage M (1999) Serious play: how the world's best companies simulate to innovate. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
44. Schwartz DL (1995) The emergence of abstract representations in Dyad problem solving. J Learn Sci 4(3):321.
45. Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: why more is less. Ecco, New York.
46. Smith S (1993) Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Mem Cognit 21:837-845.
47. Stroebe W, Diehl M (1994) Why groups are less effective than their members: on productivity losses in idea-generating groups. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 5:271.
48. Sutton R, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Adm Sci Q 41:685.
49. Taylor D, Berry P, Block C (1958) Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Adm Sci Q 3(1):23-47.
50. Thomke S, Nimgade A (2000) IDEO product development. Harvard Business School Case, Boston.
51. Thompson L, Gentner D, Loewenstein J (2000) Avoiding missed opportunities in managerial life: analogical training more powerful than individual case training. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 82(1):60-75.
52. Tohidi M, Buxton W, Baecker R, Sellen A (2006) Getting the right design and the design right. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, pp 1243-1252.
53. Warr A, O'Neill E (2005) Understanding design as a social creative process. In: Proceedings of the conference on creativity & cognition, ACM, New York, pp 118-127.
54. Wisniewski E, Gentner D (1991) On the combinatorial semantics of noun pairs: (minor) and major adjustments to meaning. In: Understanding word and sentence. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 241-284.
55. Zwicky F (1969) Discovery, invention, research through the morphological approach. MacMillan, New York.