Momentum: Getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 1233-1236

  Bao, Patti ^a   Gerber, Elizabeth ^a,b   Gergle, Darren ^a   Hoffman, David ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

brainstorming; creativity support tools; group creativity

Indexed keywords

BRAINSTORMING SESSIONS; CREATIVITY SUPPORT; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 77954023856     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753511     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Antunes, P., & Ho, T. (2001). The design of a GDSS meeting preparation tool. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 5-25. (Pubitemid 33226235)
2. Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2001). Small group brainstorming and idea quality: Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? Small Group Research, 32(2), 158-205.
3. David, M., Rosa, M., Santoro, F., & Borges, M. (2006). Considering context elements in pre-meeting systems. Proc. CSCWD 2006, 209-214.
4. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. J. of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531-537.
5. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497-509.
6. Dunnette, M., Campbell, J., & Jaastad, K. (1963). Effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for two industrial samples. J. of Applied Psychology, 30-37.
7. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 53-56.
8. Gerber, E. (2009). Using improvisation to enhance the effectiveness of brainstorming. Proc. CHI '09, 97-104.
9. Hilliges, O., Terrenghi, L., Boring, S., Kim, D., Richter, H., & Butz, A. (2007). Designing for collaborative problem solving. Proc. Creativity & Cognition, 137-46.
10. Nijstad, B., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality & Social Psyc. Rev., 10, 186-213.
11. Osborn, A. (1957). Applied imagination. NY: Scribner.
12. Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R., & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Info. Systems Research, 10(2), 110-133.
13. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 114-138.
14. Steiner, I. (1972). Group processes and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. Ung, T. (2009). Idea-generation: Exploring a co-creation methodology using online subject matter experts, generative tools, free association, and storytelling during the pre-design phase. Masters Thesis, Ohio State Univ.
16. Wang, H.-C., Cosley, D., & Fussell, S.R. (in press). Idea Expander: Supporting group brainstorming with conversationally triggered visual thinking stimuli. Proc. CSCW 2010.
17. Wang, H.-C., Fussell, S.R., & Setlock, L.D. (2009). Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer-mediated group brainstorming. Proc. CHI 2009, 669-678.