Course-Taking Patterns of Community College Students Beginning in STEM: Using Data Mining Techniques to Reveal Viable STEM Transfer Pathways

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 57, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 544-569

  Wang, Xueli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Course taking; Data mining; STEM; Transcript analysis; Upward transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948439595     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: 1573188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11162-015-9397-4     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ACT. (2006). Developing the STEM education pipeline. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/ACT_STEM_PolicyRpt.pdf.
2. Adelman, C. (2005). Moving into town—and moving on. The community college in the lives of traditional-age students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
4. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithm for mining association rules in large databases (Research Report RJ 9839). San Jose, CA: IBM Almaden Research Center.
5. American Association of Community Colleges. (2015). Community college trends and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/PUBLICATIONS/DATAPOINTS/Pages/default.aspx.
6. Amey, M. J., Eddy, P. L., & Campbell, T. G. (2010). Crossing boundaries creating community college partnerships to promote educational transitions. Community College Review, 37(4), 333–347. doi:10.1177/0091552110365725.
7. Anderson, E., & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Retrieved from the American Council on Education website http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Documents/Increasing-the-Success-of-Minority-Students-in-Science-and-Technology-2006.pdf.
8. Bach, S. K., Banks, M. T., Kinnick, M. K., Ricks, M. F., Stoering, J. M., & Walleri, R. D. (2000). Student attendance patterns and performance in an urban postsecondary environment. Research in Higher Education, 41(3), 315–330. doi:10.1023/A:1007038726940.
9. Bahr, P. R. (2013). The deconstructive approach to understanding community college students’ pathways and outcomes. Community College Review, 41(2), 137–153. doi:10.1177/0091552113486341.
10. Bailey, T., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Bensimon, E. M., & Dowd, A. C. (2012). Developing the capacity of faculty to become institutional agents for Latinos in STEM. Retrieved from University of Southern California Center for Urban Education website http://cue.usc.edu/assests/Bensimon_Developing%20IAs_NSF%20Report%20CUE_2012.pdf.
12. Bragg, D. D. (2012). Two-year college mathematics and student progression in STEM programs of study. In S. Olson & J. B. Labov (Eds.), Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape (pp. 80–101). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
13. Burke, R., & Mattis, M. (2007). Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathe- matics: Upping the numbers. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
14. Calcagno, J. C., Crosta, P. M., Bailey, T., & Jenkins, D. (2007). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 775–801. doi:10.1007/s11162-007-9053-8.
15. Chaplot, P., Rassen, E., Jenkins, D., & Johnstone, R. (2013). Principles of redesign: Promising approaches to transforming student outcomes. Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/principles-redesign-promising-approaches-cbd.pdf.
16. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161). Retrieved from the National Center for Education Statistics website http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf.
17. Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Kisker, C. B. (2014). The American community college (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18. Cohen, A., & Ignash, J. (1994). An overview of the total college curriculum. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1994(86), 13–29. doi:10.1002/cc.36819948604.
19. Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942. doi:10.3102/0002831209349460.
20. Crosta, P. M. (2014). Intensity and attachment: How the chaotic enrollment patterns of community college students relate to educational outcomes. Community College Review, 42(2), 118–142. doi:10.1177/0091552113518233.
21. de Cohen, C. C., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 211–226. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01020.x.
22. Dowd, A. C. (2012). Developing supportive STEM community college to four-year college and university transfer ecosystems. In S. Olson & J. B. Labov (Eds.), Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape (pp. 107–134). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
23. Espinosa, L. L. (2011). Pipelines to pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–240.
24. Fox, M. A. (2003). Pan-organizational summit on the U.S. science and engineering workforce: Meeting summary. Retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK36359/pdf/TOC.pdf.
25. Gabbard, G., Singleton, S., Macias, E. E., Dee, J., Bensimon, E. M., Dowd, A. C., et al. (2006). Practices supporting transfer of low-income community college transfer students to selective institutions: Case study findings. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Boston and University of Southern California.
26. Hacker, A. (2015, July 9). The frenzy about high-tech talent. The New York Reviews of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2015/jul/09/frenzy-about-high-tech-talent/.
27. Hagedorn, L. S. (2005). Transcript analyses as a tool to understand community college student academic behaviors. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 13(1), 45–57.
28. Hagedorn, L. S., Cabrera, A., & Prather, G. (2010). The community college transfer calculator: Identifying the course-taking patterns that predict transfer. Journal of College Student Retention, 12(1), 105–130. doi:10.2190/CS.12.1.g.
29. Hagedorn, L. S., & DuBray, D. (2010). Math and science success and nonsuccess: Journeys within the community college. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 31–50. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i1.30.
30. Hagedorn, L. S., & Kress, A. M. (2008). Using transcripts in analyses: Directions and opportunities. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2005(143), 7–17. doi:10.1002/cc.331.
31. Hagedorn, L. S., Maxwell, W. E., Cypers, S., Moon, H. S., & Lester, J. (2007). Course shopping in urban community colleges: An analysis of student drop and add activities. The Journal of Higher Education., 78(4), 464–485. doi:10.1353/jhe.2007.0023.
32. Hagedorn, L. S., & Purnamasari, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 40(2), 145–164. doi:10.1177/0091552112443701.
33. Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques (3rd ed.). Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. Haselgrove, S. (1994). Why the student experience matters. In S. Haselgrove (Ed.), the student experience (pp. 3–8). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
35. Hoffman, E., Starobin, S. S., Laanan, F. S., & Rivera, M. (2010). Role of community colleges in STEM education: Thoughts on implications for policy, practice, and future research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(1), 85–96. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i1.60.
36. Jackson, D. L., & Laanan, F. S. (2011). The role of community colleges in educating women in science and engineering. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 39–49. doi:10.1002/ir.407.
37. Jankowski, N. A., & Marshall, D. W. (2014). Roadmap to enhanced student learning: Implementing the DQP and Tuning. Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment and Institute for Evidence-Based Change.
38. Jaschik, S. (2015, April 13). UCLA faculty approves diversity requirement. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/04/13/ucla-faculty-approves-diversity-requirement.
39. Jenkins, D., & Cho, S. -W. (2012). Get with the program: Accelerating community college students’ entry into and completion of programs of study (CCRC Working Paper No. 32). Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/accelerating-student-entry-completion.pdf.
40. Jenkins, D., & Cho, S.-W. (2014). Get with the program … and finish it: Building guided pathways to accelerate student completion. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2014(164), 27–35. doi:10.1002/cc.20078.
41. Kopko, E., & Cho, S.-W. (2013). Timing of concentration, completion, and exit in community college (CCRC Analytics Report). Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/timing-of-concentration-completion-exit.pdf.
42. Leinbach, D. T., & Jenkins, D. (2008). Using longitudinal data to increase community college student success: A guide to measuring milestone and momentum point attainment (CCRC Research Tools No. 2). Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/longitudinal-data-momentum-point-research-tool.pdf.
43. Linde, N. (2011, July 13). Bring girls into the science-major pipeline, The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Bringing-Girls-Into-the/128099/.
44. Lowell, B. L., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. Retrieved from The Urban Institute website http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/411562-Into-the-Eye-of-the-Storm.PDF.
45. Luan, J., & Zhao, C. (2006). Practicing data mining for enrollment management and beyond. New Direction for Institutional Research, 2006(131), 117–122. doi:10.1002/ir.191.
46. National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Retrieved from the National Science Foundation website http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201510.pdf.
47. Packard, B. W.-L. (2012). Effective outreach, recruitment, and mentoring into STEM pathways: Strengthening partnerships with community colleges. In S. Olson & J. B. Labov (Eds.), Community colleges in the evolving STEM education landscape (pp. 58–79). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
48. Palmer, R. T., & Wood, J. L. (2013). Community colleges and STEM: Examining underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities. New York, NY: Routledge.
49. Porter, S. R., & Umbach, P. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3.
50. Richardson, J. T. E., & King, E. (1998). Adult students in higher education: Burden or boon? The Journal of Higher Education, 69(1), 65–88. doi:10.2307/2649182.
51. Riegle-Crumb, C., & King, B. (2010). Questioning a White male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. doi:10.3102/0013189X10391657.
52. Roksa, J., & Calcagno, J. C. (2010). Catching up in community colleges: Academic preparation and transfer to four-year institutions. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 260–288.
53. Roksa, J., & Keith, B. (2008). Credits, time, and attainment: Articulation policies and success after transfer. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 236–254. doi:10.3102/0162373708321383.
54. Sax, L. J., Shapiro, C. A., & Eagan, M. K. (2011). Promoting mathematical and computer self-concept among female college students: Is there a role of single-sex secondary education? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(4), 325–355. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2011002386.
55. Scott-Clayton, J. (2011). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community college (CCRC Working Paper No. 25). Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/shapeless-river.pdf.
56. Seymour, E. (1995). The loss of women from science, mathematics, and engineering undergraduate majors: An explanatory account. Science Education, 79(4), 437–473. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790406.
57. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
58. Starobin, S. S., & Laanan, F. S. (2008). Broadening female participation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Experiences at community colleges. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2008(142), 37–46. doi:10.1002/cc.323.
59. Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243–270. doi:10.1080/10824660701601266.
60. Wang, X. (2013a). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. doi:10.3102/0002831213488622.
61. Wang, X. (2013b). Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 664–692. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9291-x.
62. Wang, X. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 376–393. doi:10.3102/0162373714552561.
63. Wao, H. O., Lee, R. S., & Borman, K. (2010). Climate for retention to graduation: A mixed methods investigation of student perceptions of engineering departments and programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 16(4), 293–318. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v16.i4.20.
64. Zeidenberg, M., & Scott, M. (2011). The context of their coursework: Understanding course-taking patterns at community colleges by clustering student transcripts (CCRC Working Paper No. 35). Retrieved from Columbia University, Community College Research Center website http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/coursework-patterns-clustering-transcript.pdf.