Truth and deception at the rhetorical structure level

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 905-917

  Rubin, Victoria L ^a   Lukoianova, Tatiana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

computer mediated communications; discourse analysis; natural language processing

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; VECTOR SPACES;

AUTOMATED DECEPTION DETECTIONS; COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY; VECTOR SPACE MODELS;

TEXT PROCESSING;

CLINICAL TRIAL; DECEPTION; HUMAN; MODEL; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 84948402645     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23216     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bachenko, J., Fitzpatrick, E., &, Schonwetter, M., (2008). Verification and implementation of language-based deception indicators in civil and criminal narratives. In, D. Scott, &, H. Uszkoreit, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2008) (pp. 41-48). Manchester, UK: COLING 2008 Organization Committee.
2. Baeza-Yates, R., &, Ribeiro-Neto, B., (1999). Modern information retrieval. New York: ACM Press.
3. Ballou, D., &, Pazer, H., (1995). Designing information systems to optimize the accuracy-timeliness tradeoff. Information Systems Research, 6, 51-72.
4. Berkhin, P., (2002). Survey of clustering data mining techniques. Technical Report. San Jose, CA: Accrue Software. doi: 10.1.1.18.3739
5. Bilmes, J.A., (1998). A gentle tutorial of the EM algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/ftp/pub/techreports/1997/tr-97-021.pdf
6. Buller, D.B., &, Burgoon, J.K., (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.
7. Cadez, I., V, Gaffney, S., &, Smyth, P., (2000). A general probabilistic framework for clustering individuals and objects. In, R. Ramakrishnan, S. Stolfo, R. Bayardo, &, I. Parsa, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD) (pp. 140-149). New York: ACM Press.
8. Delone, W.H., &, McLean, E.R., (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60-95.
9. DePaulo, B.M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J.J., &, Muhlenbruck, L., (1997). The accuracy-confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346-357.
10. Feng, V.W., &, Hirst, G., (2012). Text-level discourse parsing with rich linguistic features. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (ACL2012) (pp. 60-68). Jeju, Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Fox, C.J., (1983). Information and misinformation: An investigation of the notions of information, misinformation, informing, and misinforming. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
12. Frank, M.G., Paolantinio, N., Feeley, T.H., &, Servoss, T.J., (2004). Individual and small group accuracy in judging truthful and deceptive communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 45-59.
13. Fuller, C.M., Biros, D.P., &, Wilson, R.L., (2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues. Decision Support Systems, 46, 695-703.
14. Goodhue, D.L., (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41, 1827-1844.
15. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., &, Black, W.C., (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Hancock, J.T., Curry, L.E., Goorha, S., &, Woodworth, M., (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45, 1-23.
17. Hernault, H., Prendinger, H., duVerle, D.A., &, Ishizuka, M., (2010). HILDA: A discourse parser using support vector machine classification. Dialogue and Discourse, 1, 1-33.
18. Indyk, P., (1999). A sublinear time approximation scheme for clustering in metric spaces. In, R. Ostrovsky, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. (IEEE FOCS 40) (pp. 144-149). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Jarke, M., &, Vassiliou, Y., (1997). Data warehouse quality: A review of the dwq project. Paper presented at Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA.
20. Karypis, G., (2002). CLUTO: A clustering toolkit. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Computer Science Department.
21. Lin, Z., Kan, M.-Y., &, Ng, H.T., (2009). Recognizing implicit discourse relations in the Penn Discourse Treebank. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP2009), 1 (pp. 343-351). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
22. Lukoianova, T., &, Rubin, V.L., (2014). Veracity roadmap: Is big data objective, truthful and credible? Advances in Classification Research Online, 24 (1). doi: 10.7152/acro.v24i1.14671
23. Mann, W.C., &, Thompson, S.A., (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243-281.
24. Manning, C.D., &, Schütze, H., (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Marcu, D., (1997). The rhetorical parsing of natural language texts. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL (pp. 96-103). Madrid.
26. Marcu, D., &, Echihabi, A., (2002). An unsupervised approach to recognizing discourse relations. In Proceedings of the ACL (pp. 368-375). Philadelphia.
27. Mihalcea, R., &, Strapparava, C., (2009). The lie detector: explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In Proceedings of the ACL (pp. 309-312). Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org.
28. Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., &, Booth, R.J., (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX. Retrieved from http://www.liwc.net
29. Porter, S., &, Yuille, J.C., (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-458.
30. Rasmussen, M., &, Karypis, G., (2004). gCLUTO: An interactive clustering, visualization and analysis system. UMN-CS TR-04-021.
31. Rieh, S.Y., (2010). Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In, M. Bates, &, M.N. Maack, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences (3rd ed., pp. 1337-1344). New York: Taylor and Francis.
32. Rose, K., (1998). Deterministic annealing for clustering, compression, classification, regression, and related optimization problems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86, 2210-2239.
33. Rubin, V.L., (2010). On deception and deception detection: Content analysis of computer-mediated stated beliefs. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 47, 1-10. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504701124
34. Rubin, V.L., &, Chen, Y., (2012). Information manipulation classification theory for LIS and NLP. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 49, 1-5. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504901353
35. Rubin, V.L., &, Conroy, N., (2011). Challenges in automated deception detection in computer-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 48, 1-4. doi: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801098
36. Rubin, V.L., &, Conroy, N., (2012). Discerning truth from deception: human judgments and automation efforts. First Monday, 17 (3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3933
37. Rubin, V.L., &, Vashchilko, T., (2012). Extending information quality assessment methodology: Information veracity measure. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, 49 (1), 1-6. doi: 10.1002/meet.14504901350
38. Salton, G., &, McGill, M.J., (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39. Scholkopf, B., &, Smola, A., (2001). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Strehl, A., Ghosh, J., &, Mooney, R., (2000). Impact of similarity measures on web-page clustering. In, K. Bollacker, (Ed.), Proceedings of the AAAI 2000 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Web Search (pp. 58-64). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI.
41. Taboada, M., (2004). Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Taboada, M., &, Mann, W.C., (2006). Applications of rhetorical structure theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
43. Tombros, A., (2002). The effectiveness of query-based hierarchic clustering of documents for information retrieval (Doctoral thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow).
44. Vapnik, V., (1998). Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
45. Vartapetiance, A., &, Gillam, L., (2012). Deception detection for the tangled web. Special Issue of ACM SIGCAS Computer and Society.
46. Vrij, A., (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. New York: Wiley.
47. Wand, Y., &, Wang, R.Y., (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39 (11), 86-95.
48. Wang, R.Y., &, Strong, D.M., (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (4), 5-34.
49. Zhong, S., &, Ghosh, J., (2003). Scalable, Balanced Model-Based Clustering. In, D. Barbara, &, C. Kamath, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 71-82). San Francisco, CA.
50. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J.K., Nunamaker, J.F., &, Twitchell, D., (2004). Automating linguistics-based cues for detecting deception in text-based asynchronous computer-mediated communications. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 81-106.
51. Zmud, R.W., (1978). An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sciences, 9, 187-195.