Extending information quality assessment methodology: A new veracity/deception dimension and its measures

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-6

  Rubin, Victoria L ^a   Vashchilko, Tatiana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deception detection; Information quality assessment; Lying; Natural language processing; Online tools; Veracity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878559797     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901350     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. Bachenko, E. Fitzpatrick and M. Schonwetter, 2008. Verification and Implementation of Language-Based Deception Indicators in Civil and Criminal Narratives. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Manchester, UK: ACL.
2. D.P. Ballou, H.L. Pazer, Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems, Management Science 31 (2), 1985, pp. 150-162.
3. Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (1994). Interpersonal Deception: V. Accuracy In Deception Detection. Communication Monographs, 61(4), 303.
4. R. Chandramouli and K. Subbalakshmi. 2012. Text Analytics: Deception Detection and Gender Identification from Text. http://stealthserver01.ece. stevens-tech.edu/createtext?count=7840
5. W.H. Delone, E.R. McLean, Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3 (1), 1992, pp. 60-95.
6. B. J. Fogg and H. Tseng. 1999. The elements of computer credibility. Paper read at SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
7. D.L. Goodhue, Understanding user evaluations of information systems, Management Science 41 (12), 1995, pp. 1827- 1844.
8. J.T. Hancock, L.E. Curry, S. Goorha, and M. Woodworth. 2008. On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1):1-23.
9. V. Hauch, I. Blandón-Gitlin, J. Masip and S. Ludwig Sporer. 2012. Linguistic Cues to Deception Assessed by Computer Programs: A Meta-Analysis.
10. M. Jarke, Y. Vassiliou, Data warehouse quality: a review of the DWQ project, Proceedings of the Conference on Information Quality, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 299-313.
11. D.F. Larcker and A.A. Zakolyukina, 2010. Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls: Stanford University Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper Series No. 83.
12. J. H. McManus. (2009). Detecting Bull: How to Identify Bias and Junk Journalism in Print, Broadcast and on the Wild Web. Sunnyvale, CA: Unvarnished Press.
13. R. Mihalcea and C. Strapparava. 2009. The lie detector: Explorations in the automatic recognition of deceptive language. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pages 309-312. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. K. Moffit and J.S.Giboney. 2012. http://splice.cmi.arizona.edu/
15. M. L. Newman, J. W. Pennebaker, D. S. Berry, and J. M. Richards. 2003. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29: 665-675.
16. M. Ott, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, and J. T. Hancock. 2011. Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination. In the Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, p309-319. Portland, Oregon, June 19-24, 2011.
17. J. W. Pennebaker, M. E. Francis, and R. J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
18. S. Y. Rieh. 2010. Credibility and Cognitive Authority of Information. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition, edited by B. M and M. N. Maack New York: Taylor and Francis Group.
19. V. L. Rubin. (2010). On Deception and Deception Detection: Content Analysis of Computer-Mediated Stated Beliefs. In the Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, October 22-27.
20. V. L. Rubin and Y. Chen (Forthcoming). Information Manipulation Classification Theory for LIS and NLP
21. V. L. Rubin & Conroy, N. (2012). Discerning truth from deception: Human judgments and automation efforts. First Monday, 17(3). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org
22. V. L. Rubin & Conroy, N. (Forthcoming). Deception in Professional Biographic Documentation: Résumés, Application Letters and Job Descriptions.
23. V. L. Rubin, V. L & Vashchilko, T. (2012). Identification of Truth and Deception in Text: Application of Vector Space Model to Rhetorical Structure Theory. The Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter for the Association for Computational Linguistics: Computational Approached to Deception Detection Workshop (EACL 2012), Avignon, France, April 23, 2012, newdesign.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W12/W12-04.pdf#page=107
24. Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House.
25. A.Vrij, S. Mann, S. Kristen, and R. P. Fisher. 2007. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law and Human Behavior, 31(5), 499-518.
26. Y. Wand, R.Y. Wang, Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations, Communications of the ACM 39 (11), 1996, pp. 86-95.
27. R.Y. Wang, D.M. Strong, Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers, Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4), 1996, pp. 5-34.
28. R. Zmud, concepts, theories and techniques: an empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information, Decision Sciences 9 (2), 1978, pp. 187-195.