Challenges in automated deception detection in computer-mediated communication

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 48, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Rubin, Victoria L ^a   Conroy, Niall J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Automated text categorization; Computer mediated communication; Content analysis; Deception detection; Elicitation; Lying; Machine learning; Truth; Verbal cues

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861445891     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801098     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Burgoon, J. K., Blair, J. P., Qin, T. T., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Detecting deception through linguistic analysis. Intelligence and Security Informatics, Proceedings, 2665, 91-101.
2. DePaulo, B. M. (1994). Spotting lies: Can humans learn to do better? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 83-86.
3. DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The Accuracy-Confidence Correlation in the Detection of Deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 346-357.
4. Fuller, C. M., Biros, D. P., & Wilson, R. L. (2009). Decision support for determining veracity via linguistic-based cues Decision Support Systems 46(3), 695-703.
5. Hancock, J., Curry, L., & Goorha, S. (2008). On lying and being lied to: A linguistic analysis of deception in computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 45(1), 1-23.
6. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Larcker, D. F., & Zakolyukina, A. A. (2010). Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls: Stanford University Rock Center for Corporate Governance Working Paper Series No. 83.
8. Mahon, J. E. (2008). The Definition of Lying and Deception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
9. Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2009). The Lie Detector: Explorations in the Automatic Recognition of Deceptive Language. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Aug. 2-7, Singapore
10. Mitchell, R. W. (1996). The psychology of human deception. Social Research, 63(3), 819-861.
11. Newman, M., Pennebaker, J., Berry, D., & Richards, J. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665-675.
12. Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69(2), 144-157.
13. Porter, S., & Yuille, J. (1996). The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context. Law & Human Behavior, 20(4), 443-458.
14. Rubin, V. L. (2010). On Deception and Deception Detection: Content Analysis of Computer-Mediated Stated Beliefs Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, Oct. 22-27, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Witten, I. H., & Frank, E. (2005). Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (2 ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann
16. Zhou, L., Burgoon, J., Nunamaker, J., & Twitchell, D. (2004). Automating Linguistics-Based Cues for Detecting Deception in Text-Based Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communications. Group Decision & Negotiation, 13(1), 81-106.