A novel modelling framework to prioritize estimation of non-point source pollution parameters for quantifying pollutant origin and discharge in urban catchments

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 167, Issue , 2016, Pages 75-84

  Fraga, I ^a   Charters, F J ^b   O'Sullivan, A D ^b   Cochrane, T A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Non point source pollution; Rainfall runoff; Sensitivity analysis; Stormwater modelling; Urban drainage

Indexed keywords

COPPER; LEAD; RAIN; RUNOFF; STORM WATER; ZINC; HEAVY METAL; WATER POLLUTANT;

CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; DEGRADATION; HEAVY METAL; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; ROAD; ROOF; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STORMWATER; URBAN DRAINAGE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CATCHMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; MODEL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; URBAN AREA; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; ANALYSIS; CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; POLLUTION; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW;

CITIES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; METALS, HEAVY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RAIN; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84947757603     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ahlman S. Modelling of Substance Flows in Urban Drainage Systems 2006, Chalmers University of Technology.
2. Artina S., Bardasi G., Borea F., Franco C., Maglionico M., Paoletti A., Sanfilippo U. Water quality modelling in ephemeral streams receiving urban overflows: the pilot study in Bologna. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage 1999.
3. Christiaens K., Feyen J. Analysis of uncertainties associated with different methods to determine soil hydraulic properties and their propagation in the distributed hydrological MIKE SHE model. J. Hydrol. 2001, 246:63-81.
4. Crosetto M., Tarantola S. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2001, 15(5):415-437.
5. Cukier R.I., Levine H.B., Shuler K.E. Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems. J. Comput. Phys. 1978, 26:1-4.
6. Davis A.P., Shokouhian M., Ni S.B. Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere 2001, 44(5):997-1009.
7. Deletic A. The first flush load of urban surface runoff. Water Res. 1998, 32(8):2462-2470.
8. DHI Software Mike urban by DHI 2014 [Software] Available from:. http://mikebydhi.com/Download/MIKEByDHI2014.aspx.
9. ECan (Environment Canterbury) Regional Environment Report 2008, Chapter 2: Water Quantity, Quality and Ecosystems 2008, Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
10. Egodawatta P., Goonetilleke A. Understanding road surface pollutant wash-off and underling physical processes using simulated rainfall. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57:1241-1246.
11. Egodawatta P., Thomas E., Goonetilleke A. Understanding the physical processes of pollutant build-up and wash-off on roof surfaces. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(6):1834-1841.
12. Francos A., Elorza F.J., Bouraoui F., Bidoglio G., Galbiati L. Sensitivity analysis of distributed environmental simulation models: understanding the model behaviour in hydrological studies at the catchment scale. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2003, 79:205-218.
13. Frey H., Patil S. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal. 2002, 22:553-578.
14. Gnecco I., Berretta C., Lanza L.G., La Barbera P. Storm water pollution in the urban environment of Genoa, Italy. Atmos. Res. 2005, 77(1-4):60-73.
15. Gupta K., Saul A.J. Specific relationships for the first flush load in combined sewer flows. Water Res. 1996, 30(5):1244-1252.
16. He W., Odnevall Wallinder I., Leygraf C. A laboratory study of copper and zinc runoff during first flush and steady-state conditions. Corros. Sci. 2001, 43(1):127-146.
17. Kirchner J.W. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(3).
18. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21(2):239-245.
19. Mendez C.B., Klenzendorf J.B., Afshar B.R., Simmons M.T., Barrett M.E., Kinney K.A., Kirisits M.J. The effect of roofing material on the quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res. 2011, 45(5):2049-2059.
20. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991, 2:1-33.
21. Murphy L., O'Sullivan A.D., Cochrane T.A. Quantifying the spatial variability of airborne pollutants to stormwater runoff in different land-use catchments. Water. Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225(7):1-13.
22. Novotny V., Chesters G. Handbook of Nonpoint Pollution: Sources and Management. Van Nostrand Reinhold Environmental Engineering Series 1981, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, New York.
23. O'Sullivan A.D., Wicke D., Cochrane T.A. Heavy metal dynamics in an urban stream fed by contaminated air-conditioning and stormwater discharges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2012, 19(3):903-911.
24. Obropta C.C., Kardos J.S. Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43:1508-1523.
25. Pennington S.L., Webster-Brown J.G. Stormwater runoff quality from copper roofing, Auckland, New Zealand. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2008, 42(1):99-108.
26. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modelling. Stat. Sci. 2000, 15(4):377-395.
27. Saltelli A., Karen C., Scott M. Sensitivity Analysis 2000, vol. 134. Wiley, New York.
28. Saltelli A., Tarantola A., Campologo F., Ratto M. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: a Guide to Assessing Scientific Models 2004, Wiley.
29. Shaw E.M. Hydrology in Practice 1994, Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. third ed.
30. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) Report to Congress: Nonpoint Source Pollution in the U.S.A 1984, Office of the Water Program Operations, Water Planning Division, Washington DC, USA.
31. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) Stormwater Management Model, Users' Manual, Version 5.0. EPA/600/r-05/040, National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development 2010, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
32. Wallingford Software Ltd User Guide and Help System for HYDROWORKS, Ver. 6.0 User's Manual, Oxon, UK 2002.
33. Wicke D., Cochrane T.A., O'Sullivan A.D. Contaminant run-off from impervious surfaces such as carparks and roofs. Proceedings of the 17th Congress of the Asia and Pacific Division of the International Association of Hydro-environment Engineering and Research 2010.
34. Wicke D., Cochrane T.A., O'Sullivan A.D. Build-up dynamics of heavy metals deposited on impermeable urban surfaces. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 113:347-354.
35. Wicke D., Cochrane T.A., O'Sullivan A.D. Atmospheric deposition and storm induced runoff of heavy metals from different impermeable urban surfaces. J. Environ. Monit. 2012, 14(1):209-216.
36. Zanders J.M. Road sediment: characterization and implications for the performance of vegetated strips for treating road run-off. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 339(1-3):41-47.
37. Zoppou C. Review of urban storm water models. Environ. Model. Softw. 2001, 16:195-231.