Rehabilitation - A new approach. Part two: The underlying theories

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1145-1154

  Wade, Derick ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Biopsychosocial model; goal setting; rehabilitation process

Indexed keywords

DISABLED PERSON; HUMAN; REHABILITATION; TRENDS;

DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; REHABILITATION;

EID: 84947721851     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215515601175     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Wade DT, Halligan PW,. Do biomedical models of illness make for good healthcare systems? British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 1398-1401.
2. Wade DT,. Rehabilitation-a new approach. Part one: the problem. Clinical Rehabilitation 2015; 29 (11): 1041-1050.
3. Engel GL,. The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129-136.
4. Waddell G,. The back pain revolution. Second edition. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.
5. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. ICFWorld Health Organisation, Geneva, 2002. Available at: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
6. Wade DT,. Holistic Health Care. What is it, and how can we achieve it? 209. Available at: http://www.ouh.nhs.uk/oce/research-education/documents/HolisticHealthCare09-11-15.pdf
7. Williams N, Wilkinson C, Stott N, Menkes DB,. Functional illness in primary care: dysfunction versus disease. BMC Family Practice 2008; 9: 30.
8. Wade DT,. Complexity, case-mix and rehabilitation: the importance of a holistic model of illness. Clinical Rehabilitation 2011; 25: 387-395.
9. Wade DT,. An interdisciplinary approach to neurological rehabilitation. In: Dietz V, Ward N, (eds) Oxford Textbook of Neurorehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, chapter 2. pp 8-17.
10. Wade DT,. Why physical medicine, physical disability and physical rehabilitation? We should abandon Cartesian dualism. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 185-190.
11. Wade DT,. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clinical Rehabilitation 2005; 19: 811-818.
12. Wade DT,. Principles of Neurological Rehabilitation. In: Donaghy M, (ed) Brain's Diseases of the Nervous System. 12th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 chapter 6. pp 165-179.
13. Troigros O, Bejot Y, Rodriguez PM, et al. Measuring complexity in neurological rehabilitation: the Oxford Case Complexity Assessment Measure (OCCAM). Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 499-507.
14. Stallinga HA, Dijkstra PU, Bos I, et al. The ambiguity of the concept of participation in measurement instruments: operationalization of participation influences research outcomes. Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 1225-1236.
15. Piskur B, Daniels R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 211-220.
16. Arvidsson P, Granlund M, Thyberg M,. How are the activity and participation aspects of the ICF used? Examples from studies of people with intellectual disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation 2015; 36: 45-49.
17. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD000197. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub2.
18. Langhorne P, Pollock A,. in conjunction with the Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration What are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing 2002; 31: 365-371.
19. Carpenter I, Bobby J, Kulinskaya E, et al. People admitted to hospital with physical disability have increased length of stay: implications for diagnosis related group re-imbursement in England. Age & Ageing 2007; 36: 73-78.
20. Nair KPS, Wade DT,. Life goals of people with disabilities due to neurological disorders. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 521-527.
21. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G,. Stroke Rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693-1702.
22. Wade DT,. Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 183-186.
23. Choi BCK, Pak AWP,. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 2. Promotors, barriers, and strategies of enhancement., Clinical Investigatory Medicine 2007; 30: E224-E232.
24. Bergs J, Hellings J, Cleemput I, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications. British Journal of Surgery 2014; 101: 150-158.
25. Chen Y, Pope S, Tyler D, et al. Effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper-extremity function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 939-953.
26. Locke EA, Latham GP,. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist 2002; 57: 705-172.
27. Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. Physical, cognitive and social activity levels of stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation within a mixed rehabilitation unit. Clinical Rehabilitation 2014; 28: 91-101.
28. Huijben-Schoenmakers M, Gael C, Hafsteindottir TB,. Filling up the hours: howdo stroke patients on a rehabilitation nursing home spend the day? Clinical Rehabilitation 2009; 23: 1145-1150.
29. Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A,. The effect of a structured programme to increase patient activity during inpatient rehabilitation: a phase I cohort study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0269215515575335.