The effect of a structured programme to increase patient activity during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: A Phase i cohort study

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 191-198

  Tyson, S F ^a   Burton, L ^a,b   McGovern, A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Greater Manchester Strategic Clinical Network   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

everyday physical activity; implementation; Planning rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

CAREGIVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EDUCATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROCEDURES; SELF CARE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTOR; UNITED KINGDOM;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; CAREGIVERS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MOTOR ACTIVITY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PEER GROUP; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; SELF CARE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84952334391     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215515575335     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550-1556.
2. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 191-196.
3. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: A meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529-2539.
4. Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C., Physiotherapy after stroke: More is better? Physiother Res Int 1996; 1: 75-88.
5. Keith RA., Activity patterns of stroke rehabilitation unit. Soc Sci Med 1980; 14: 575-580.
6. Keith RA, Cowell KS., Time use of stroke patients in three rehabilitation hospitals. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 529-533.
7. Lincoln NB, Gamlen R, Thomason H., Behavioural mapping of patients on a stroke unit. Int Disabil Studies 1989; 11: 149-154.
8. Tinson DJ., How stroke patients spend their days: an observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movement disorders following stroke. Int Disabil Studies 1989; 11: 45-49.
9. Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conducive to physical activity than less structured than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1066-1070.
10. Esmonde T, McGinley J, Wittwer J, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: Patient activity during non-therapy time. Aust J Physiother 1997; 43: 43-51.
11. Bernhardt J, Chan J, James NI, et al. Little therapy, little physical activity: Rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med 2007; 39 (1): 43-48.
12. Bernhardt J, Dewey HM, Thrift AG, et al. Inactive and alone: Physical activity in the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1005-1009.
13. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18 (8): 833-862.
14. De Wit L, Putman K, Schuback B, et al. Motor and functional recovery after stroke a comparison of 4 European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2007; 38 (7): 2101-2107.
15. De Wit L, Putman K, Lincoln N, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in Europe what do physiotherapists and occupational therapists actually do? Stroke 2006; 37 (6): 1483-1489.
16. De Wit L, Putman K, Dejaeger E, et al. Use of time by stroke patients a comparison of four European rehabilitation centers. Stroke 2005; 36 (9): 1977-1983.
17. Bernhardt J, Chitravas N, Meslo IL, et al. Not all stroke units are the same. A comparison of physical activity patterns in Melbourne, Australia, and Trondheim, Norway. Stroke 2008; 39: 2059-2065.
18. van Wijk R, Cumming T, Churilov L, et al. An early mobilization protocol successfully delivers more and earlier therapy to acute stroke patients: Further results from Phase II of AVERT. Neurorehabil Neur Repair 2012; 26: 20-26.
19. Royal College of Physicians. National clinical guidelines for stroke. 4th ed. London, 2012. www.rcplondon.ac.uk/resources/stroke-guidelines (. accessed October 2014).
20. Ada L, Dean CM, Mackey F, et al. Increasing the amount of physical activity undertaken after stroke. Phys Ther Rev 2006; 11: 91-100.
21. Huijben-Schoenmakers M, Rademaker A, Scherder E., Can practice undertaken by patients be increased simply through implementing agreed national guidelines?' An observational study. Clin Rehab 2013; 27 (6): 513-520.
22. Nakayama DK, Bushey TN, Hubbard I, et al. Using a plan-do-study-act cycle to introduce a new OR service line. AORN Journal 2010; 92: 335-343.
23. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM., Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: A framework for change. Milbank Q 2001; 79 (2): 281-315.
24. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. How to change practice; Understand, Identify and Overcome Barriers to Change. 2007. http://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/Into-practice/Support-for-service-improvement-and-audit/How-to-change-practice-barriers-to-change.pdf (. accessed October 2014).
25. The NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Quality and Service Improvement Tools. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/quality-and-service-improvement-tools/quality-and-service-improvement-tools/quality-and-service-improvement-tools-for-the-nhs.html (. accessed 2 February 2015).
26. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010 Round 7. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians of London, 2011. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/national-sentinel