Dynamic activity-travel assignment in multi-state supernetworks

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 81, Issue , 2015, Pages 656-671

  Liu, Peng ^a,b   Liao, Feixiong ^b   Huang, Hai Jun ^a   Timmermans, Harry ^b  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Activity travel link path disutility; Dynamic activity travel assignment; Dynamic user equilibrium; Multi state supernetwork

Indexed keywords

TRAFFIC CONTROL; VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

ACTIVITY BASED MODELING; ACTIVITY-TRAVEL PATTERNS; DISCRETE TIME DYNAMICS; DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS; DYNAMIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; INTEGRATION STRUCTURES; SUPER-NETWORK; VARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES;

TRANSPORTATION;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EID: 84947492060     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdelghany A.F., Mahmassani H.S. Temporal-spatial microassignment and sequencing of travel demand with activity-trip chains. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2003, 1831(1):89-97.
2. Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. A learning-based transportation oriented simulation system. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(7):613-633.
3. Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. A multi-state supernetwork approach to modelling multi-activity multi-modal trip chains. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2004, 18(7):631-651.
4. Arentze T.A., Molin E.J.E. Travelers' preferences in multimodal networks: design and results of a comprehensive series of choice experiments. Transportation Research Part A 2013, 58:15-28.
5. Auld J., Mohammadian A. Framework for the development of the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Letters 2009, 1(3):245-255.
6. Axhausen K.W., Gärling T. Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models and research problem. Transport Reviews 1992, 12(4):323-341.
7. Balmer M., Axhausen K., Nagel K. Agent-based demand modelling framework for large scale micro-simulations. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1985(1):125-134.
8. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y., Srinivasan S., Sivakumar A. A comprehensive econometric microsimulator for daily activity-travel patterns. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894(1):57-66.
9. Bos, D.M., 2004. Changing Seat: A Behavioural Analysis of P&R Use, Trail Thesis Series, The Netherlands.
10. Bowman J.L., Ben-Akiva M. Activity-based disaggregate travel demand model system with activity schedules. Transportation Research Part A 2001, 35(1):1-28.
11. Carey M., Ge Y.E., McCartney M. A whole-link travel-time model with desirable properties. Transportation Science 2003, 37(1):83-96.
12. Carlier, K., Fiorenzo Catalano, S., Lindvel, C., Bovy, P., 2003. A supernetwork approach towards multimodal travel modelling. In: Proceedings of the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
13. Chen H.K., Hsueh C.F. A model and an algorithm for the dynamic user-optimal route choice problem. Transportation Research Part B 1998, 32(97):219-234.
14. Chow J.Y.J. Activity-based travel scenario analysis with routing problem reoptimization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2014, 29(2):91-106.
15. Fu X., Lam W.H.K. A network equilibrium approach for modelling activity-travel pattern scheduling problems in multi-modal transit networks with uncertainty. Transportation 2014, 41(1):37-55.
16. Friesz T.L., Bernstein D., Smith T.E., Tobin R.L., Wie B.W. A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Operations Research 1993, 41(1):179-191.
17. Han L., Ukkusuri S.V., Doan K. Complementarity formulations for the cell transmission model based dynamic user equilibrium with departure time choice, elastic demand and user heterogeneity. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(10):1749-1767.
18. Horni A., Scott D.M., Balmer M., Axhausen K.W. Location choice modeling for shopping and leisure activities with MATSim. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2135(1):87-95.
19. Huang H.J., Lam W.H.K. Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(3):253-273.
20. Huang H.J., Lam W.H.K. A stochastic model for combined activity/destination/route choice problems. Annals of Operations Research 2005, 135:111-125.
21. Kang J.E., Chow J.Y.J., Recker W.W. On activity-based network design problems. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 57:398-418.
22. Kitamura R., Pas E.I., Lula C.V., Lawton T.K., Benson P.E. The sequenced activity mobility simulator (SAMS): an integrated approach to modeling transportation, land-use and air quality. Transportation 1996, 23(3):267-291.
23. Lam W.H.K., Yin Y. An activity-based time-dependent traffic assignment model. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(6):549-574.
24. Lam W.H.K., Huang H.J. A combined activity/travel choice model for congested road networks with queues. Transportation 2002, 29(1):5-29.
25. Lam W.H.K., Huang H.J. Combined activity/travel choice models: time-dependent and dynamic versions. Networks and Spatial Economics 2003, 3(3):323-347.
26. Li Z.C., Lam W.H.K., Wong S.C. Bottleneck model revisited: an activity-based perspective. Transportation Research Part B 2014, 68:262-287.
27. Liao F., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Supernetwork approach for multi-modal and multi-activity travel planning. Transportation Research Record 2010, 2175(1):38-46.
28. Liao F., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Constructing personalized transportation network in multi-state supernetworks: a heuristic approach. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 2011, 25(11):1885-1903.
29. Liao F., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Supernetwork approach for modeling traveler response to park-and-ride. Transportation Research Record 2012, 2323(1):10-17.
30. Liao F., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Incorporating space-time constraints and activity-travel time profiles in a multi-state supernetwork approach to individual activity-travel scheduling. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 55:41-58.
31. Lin D.Y., Eluru N., Waller S.T., Bhat C.R. Integration of activity-based modeling and dynamic traffic assignment. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2076(1):52-61.
32. Long J., Huang H.J., Gao Z. Discretised route travel time models based on cumulative flows. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2013, 47(1):105-125.
33. McNally M.G. The activity-based approach. Handbook of Transport Modeling 2000, 53-70. Pergamon, Amsterdam. D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button (Eds.).
34. Miller E.J., Roorda M.J. Prototype model of household activity-travel scheduling. Transportation Research Record 2003, 1831(1):114-121.
35. Nagurney A., Zhang D. Projected dynamical systems in the formulation, stability analysis, and computation of fixed-demand traffic network equilibria. Transportation Science 1997, 31(2):147-158.
36. Nagurney A. Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach 1998, Springer, p. 18.
37. Nagurney A., Dong J. Urban location and transportation in the Information age: a multiclass, multicriteria network equilibrium perspective. Environment and Planning B 2002, 29(1):53-74.
38. Nagurney A., Dong J., Mokhtarian P.L. A space-time network for telecommuting versus commuting decision making. Regional Science 2003, 82(4):451-473.
39. Ouyang L.Q., Lam W.H.K., Li Z.C., Huang D. Network user equilibrium model for scheduling daily activity travel patterns in congested networks. Transportation Research Record 2011, 2254(1):131-139.
40. Pinjari A.R., Bhat C.R. Activity-based travel demand analysis. A Handbook of Transport Economics 2011, 213-248. Edward Elgar Publishing.
41. Prato C.G. Route choice modeling: past, present and future research directions. Journal of Choice Modeling 2009, 2(1):65-100.
42. Pyrga E., Schulz F., Wagner D., Zaroliagis C. Efficient models for timetable information in public transportation systems. Journal of Experimental Algorithmics 2008, 12:2-4.
43. Ramadurai G., Ukkusuri S. Dynamic user equilibrium model for combined activity-travel choices using activity-travel super network representation. Network and Spatial Economics 2010, 10(2):273-292.
44. Ramadurai G., Ukkusuri S. B-Dynamic: an efficient algorithm for the dynamic user equilibrium in activity travel networks. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2011, 26(4):254-269.
45. Ran B., Boyce D.E. A link-based variational inequality formulation of ideal dynamic user-optimal route choice problem. Transportation Research Part C 1996, 4(1):1-12.
46. Rasouli S., Timmermans H.J.P. Activity based models of travel demand: promises, progress and prospects. The International Journal of Urban Sciences 2014, 18(1):31-60.
47. Recker W.W. A bridge between travel demand modeling and activity-based travel analysis. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(5):481-506.
48. Shiftan Y., Ben-Akiva M. A practical policy-sensitive activity-based travel demand model. The Annals of Regional Science 2011, 47(3):517-541.
49. Smith M.J., Wisten M.B. A continuous day-to-day traffic assignment model and the existence of a continuous dynamic user equilibrium. Annals of Operations Research 1995, 60(1):59-79.
50. Szeto W.Y., Lo H.K. Properties of dynamic traffic assignment with physical queues. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2005, 6:2108-2123.
51. Szeto W.Y., Lo H.K. Dynamic traffic assignment: properties and extensions. Transportmetrica 2006, 2(1):31-52.
52. Ukkusuri S.V., Han L., Kien D. Dynamic user equilibrium with a path based cell transmission model for general traffic networks. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(10):1657-1684.
53. Zhang X., Yang H., Huang H.J., Zhang H.M. Integrated scheduling of daily work activities and morning-evening commutes with bottleneck congestion. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(1):41-60.