Agent-based demand-modeling framework for large-scale microsimulations

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1985, 2006, Pages 125-134

  Balmer, Michael ^a   Axhausen, Kay W ^a   Nagel, Kai ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; USER INTERFACES;

LARGE SCALE MICROSIMULATIONS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TRAFFIC DEMAND; TRAVELER;

TRAFFIC SURVEYS;

EID: 33847328108     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1985-14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Vovsha, P., E. Petersen, and R. Donnelly. Microsimulation in Travel Demand Modeling: Lessons Learned from the New York Best Practice Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 68-77.
2. Bowman, J. L., M. Bradley, Y. Shiftan, T. K. Lawton, and M. Ben-Akiva. Demonstration of an Activity-Based Model for Portland. In World Transport Research: Selected Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Transport Research 1998, Vol. 3, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 1999.
3. Bhat, C. R., J. Y. Guo, S. Srinivasan, and A. Sivakumar. Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Daily Activity-Travel Patterns. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 57-66.
4. MATSIM, Multi Agent Traffic SIMulation. www.matsim.org. Accessed Oct. 2005.
5. VISEM. Planung Transport und Verkehr (PTV), Karlsruhe, Germany. www.ptv.de/cgi-bin/traffic/traf_visem.pl. Accessed Oct. 2005.
6. Pendyala, R. M. Phased Implementation of a Multimodal Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling System in Florida. Final Report. Research Center, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2004. www.dot.state.fl.us/ research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_PTO/FDOT_BA496.pdf. Accessed Oct. 2005.
7. Arentze, T., F. Hofman, H. van Mourik, and H. Timmermans. ALBA-TROSS: Multiagent, Rule-Based Model of Activity Pattern Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 136-144.
8. DynaMIT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, mit.edu/its/dynamit.html. Accessed Oct. 2005.
9. DYNASMART. University of Maryland, College Park, www.dynasmart.umd.edu. Accessed Oct. 2005.
10. Friedrich, M., I. Hofsäss, K. Nökel, and P. Vortisch. A Dynamic Traffic Assignment Method for Planning and Telematic Applications. Proc., Seminar K, European Transport Conference, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000.
11. TRANSIMS, TRansportation ANalysis and SIMulation System. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex. transims.tsasa. lanl.gov. Accessed Oct. 2005.
12. Raney, B., and K. Nagel. An Improved Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Simulations of Travel Behavior. In Towards Better Performing European Transportation Systems (P. Rietveld, B. Jourquin, and K. Westin, eds.), 2005 (in press). www.vsp.tu-berhn.de/publications. Accessed Oct. 2005.
13. Cetin, N., and K. Nagel. A Large-Scale Agent-Based Traffic MicroSimulation Based on Queue Model. Presented at the Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Ascona, Switzerland, 2005.
14. Waddell, P., A. Borning, M. Noth, N. Freier, M. Becke, and G. Ulfarsson. Microsimulation of Urban Development and Location Choices: Design and Implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003, pp. 43-67.
15. Salvini, P. A., and E. J. Miller. ILUTE: An Operational Prototype of a Comprehensive Microsimulation Model of Urban Systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2005, pp. 217-234.
16. Hunt, J. D., R. Johnston, J. E. Abraham, C. J. Rodier, G. R. Garry, S. H. Putman, and T. de la Barra. Comparisons from Sacramento Model Test Bed. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1780, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 53-63.
17. Abraham, J. E., T. Weidner, J. Gliebe, C. Willison, and J. D. Hunt. Three Methods for Synthesizing Base-Year Built Form for Integrated Land Use-Transport Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1902, Transporta tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 114-123.
18. SAX, Simple API for XML. www.saxproject.org. Accessed Oct. 2005.
19. Gamma, E., R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series, Boston, Mass., 1995.
20. Marchal, F., and K. Nagel. Modeling Location Choice of Secondary Activities with a Social Network of Cooperative Agents. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1935, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 141-146.
21. Balmer, M., M. Rieser, A. Vogel, K. W. Axhausen, and K. Nagel. Generating Day Plans Using Hourly Origin-Destination Matrices. In Jahrbuch 2004105 Schweizerische Verkehrswirtschaft (T. Bieger, C. Laesser, and R. Maggi, eds.), SVWG, St. Gallen, Switzerland, 2005.
22. Axhausen, K. W. Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks and Their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results. Presented at PROCESSUS Colloquium, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2005. www.civ.utoronto.ca/sect/traeng/ilute/processus2005/PaperSession/ Paper18_Axhausen_ActivitySpacesBiographies_CD_.pdf. Accessed Oct. 2005.
23. Frick, M. A. Generating Synthetic Populations Using IPF and Monte Carlo Techniques: Some New Results. Presented at 4th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Monte Verita, Ascona, Switz., 2004. www.ivt.ethz.ch/vpl/ publications/reports. Accessed Oct. 2005.
24. BFS, Swiss Federal Statistical Office, www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/en/ index.html. Accessed Oct. 2005.
25. Vrtic, M., and K. W. Axhausen. Experiment mit einem dynamischen Umlegungsverfahren. Strassenverkehrstechnik, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2003, pp. 121-126.
26. Mobilität in der Schweiz, Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2000 zum Verkehrsverhalten. ARE, Bundesamt für Raumentwicklung und Bundesamt für Statistik, Bern und Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 2001. www.are.admin.ch/are/de. Accessed Oct. 2005.
27. Axhausen, K. W., and M. Frick. Nutzungen, Strukturen, Verkehr. In Stadtverkehrsplanung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Ziele (G. Steierwald, H.-D. Künne, and W. Vogt, eds.), Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
28. RBS, Raumbezugssystem Berlin. Bevoelkerungsverteilung, Teil-Verkehrszellen und Block Geometrie/Hierarchie. Statistisches Landesamt Berlin, 2000. www.statistik-berlin.de. Accessed Oct. 2005.
29. Datengrundlagen Stadtentwicklungsplan Verkehr. SfSB, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin, 1998. www.stadtentwicklung. berlin.de. Accessed Oct. 2005.
30. Meister, K., and M. Balmer. An Improved Replanning Module for Agent-Based Micro-Simulations of Travel Behavior. Working Paper. Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT), ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 2005. www.ivt.ethz.ch/vpl/publications/reports. Accessed Oct. 2005.
31. Charypar, D., and K. Nagel. Generating Complete All-Day Activity Plans with Genetic Algorithms. Transportation, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2005, pp. 369-397.
32. Axhausen, K. W., M. Botte, and S. Schönfelder. Systematic Measurement of Catchment Areas. CTPP 2000 Status Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004. www.fhwa.dot.gov/ctpp/sr0804.pdf. Accessed Oct. 2005.