Reduced perioperative death following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of an international observational study

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 3628-3639

  Munasinghe, A ^a   Singh, B ^b   Mahmoud, N ^c   Joy, M ^d,e   Chang, D C ^f   Penninckx, F ^g   Faiz, O ^a,h  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d Dr Foster Ltd ^*  (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^h ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colorectal; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COMORBIDITY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; RECTUM RESECTION; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL MORTALITY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; LAPAROSCOPY; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TRENDS; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84947491429     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4119-8     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jacobs M, Verdeja J, Goldstein H (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:144–150
2. Phillips E, Franklin M, Carroll B, Fallas M, Ramos R, Rosenthal D (1992) Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 216:703–707
3. Kemp JA, Finlayson SRG (2008) Nationwide trends in laparoscopic colectomy from 2000 to 2004. Surg Endosc 22:1181–1187
4. Thompson BS, Coory MD, Lumley JW (2011) National trends in the uptake of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer, 2000-2008. Med J Aust 194:443–447
5. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker JJ, Müller JM (2005) Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003145. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2
6. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
7. COLOR Study Group (2000) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg 17:617–622
8. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
9. Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, Bottle A, Tekkis PP, Darzi AW, Kennedy RH (2009) Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1695–1704
10. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824
11. Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Whitehouse LE, Quirke P, Jayne D, Finan PJ, Forman D, Wilkinson JR, Morris EJA (2013) Population-based study of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery 2006-2008. Br J Surg 100:553–560
12. Kang CY, Chaudhry OO, Halabi WJ, Nguyen V, Carmichael JC, Stamos MJ, Mills S (2012) Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. Am J Surg 204:952–957
13. Cone MM, Herzig DO, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Hardiman KM, Lu KC (2012) Effect of surgical approach on 30-day mortality and morbidity after elective colectomy: a NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1212–1217
14. Bottle A, Middleton S, Kalkman CJ, Livingston EH, Aylin P (2013) Global comparators project: international comparison of hospital outcomes using administrative data. Health Serv Res 48:2081–2100
15. Bottle A, Aylin P (2011) Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1426–1433
16. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36:8–27
17. Rubin DB, Thomas N (1996) Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice. Biometrics 52:249–264
18. Flury B, Riedwyl H (1986) Standard distance in univariate and multivariate analysis. Am Stat 40:249–251
19. Diggle P, Liang K, Zeger S (1994) The analysis of longitudanal data. Oxford University Press, New York
20. Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J (2006) Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:921–928
21. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124
22. Tjandra JJ, Chan MKY (2006) Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer. Colorectal Dis 8:375–388
23. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, Athanasiou T, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P, Darzi AW, Heriot AG (2006) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 13:413–424
24. Gao F, Cao Y-F, Chen L-S (2006) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:652–656
25. Clinical Outcomes of Surgery Therapy Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
26. Laparoscopic colectomy for curable cancer. In: Am Soc Colon Rectal Surg (Position Statement). http://www.fascrs.org/physicians/position_statements/laparoscopic_colectomy/. Accessed 1 Sept 2013
27. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (T105). In: Natl Inst Heal Care Excell. http://publications.nice.org.uk/laparoscopic-surgery-for-colorectal-cancer-ta105. Accessed 1 Sept 2013
28. Morris EJA, Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Finan PJ, Coleman MP, Rachet B, Forman D (2011) Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut 60:806–813
29. Burns EM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Darzi A, Nicholls RJ, Faiz O (2011) Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics. BMJ 343:d4836
30. Morris AM, Baldwin L-M, Matthews B, Dominitz JA, Barlow WE, Dobie SA, Billingsley KG (2007) Reoperation as a quality indicator in colorectal surgery: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg 245:73–79
31. Li M, Xiao L, Wu W, Yang S, Li S (2012) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within fast-track perioperative care. Dis Colon Rectum 55:821–827
32. Cummings LC, Delaney CP, Cooper GS (2012) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for colon cancer in an older population: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 10:31
33. Penninckx F, Kartheuser A, Van de Stadt J, Pattyn P, Mansvelt B, Bertrand C, Van Eycken E, Jegou D, Fieuws S (2013) Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:1368–1375
34. Van Walraven C, Austin P (2012) Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results. J Clin Epidemiol 65:126–131