Erratum: Bumble bees show trait-dependent vulnerability to landscape simplification [Biodivers Conserv, 24, (2015), 3469-3489, DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-1008-3];Bumble bees show trait-dependent vulnerability to landscape simplification

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 24, Issue 14, 2015, Pages 3469-3489

  Persson, Anna S ^a   Rundlöf, Maj ^a   Clough, Yann ^a   Smith, Henrik G ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bombus; Intra specific variation; Life history traits; Nesting habitat; Phenology; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

BEE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MORPHOLOGY; NEST SITE; NESTING BEHAVIOR; PHENOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; VULNERABILITY;

APOIDEA; BOMBUS (GENUS);

EID: 84947489952     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-015-1030-5     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Banaszak J (1992) Strategy for conservation of wild bees in an agricultural landscape. AGEE 40:179–192. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(92)90091-O
2. Benton T (2006) Bumblebees: the natural history & identification of the species found in Britain. Collins, London
3. Bommarco R, Lundin O, Smith HG, Rundlöf M (2012) Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 279:309–315. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0647
4. Cameron SA, Hines HM, Williams PH (2007) A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus). Biol J Lin Soc 91:161–188. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00784.x
5. Cariveau DP, Winfree R (2015) Causes of variation in wild bee responses to anthropogenic drivers. Curr Opin Insect Sci 10:104–109. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.004
6. Carvell C, Roy DB, Smart SM, Pywell RF, Preston CD, Goulson D (2006) Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biol Conserv 132:481–489. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.008
7. Carvell C, Jordan WC, Bourke AFG, Pickles R, Redhead JW, Heard MS (2012) Molecular and spatial analyses reveal links between colony-specific foraging distance and landscape-level resource availability in two bumble bee species. Oikos 121:734–742. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19832.x
8. Connop S, Hill T, Steer J, Shaw P (2010) The role of dietary breadth in national bumblebee (Bombus) declines: simple correlation? Biol Conserv 143:2739–2746. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.07.021
9. Dormann C, Elith J, Buchmann S, Carsten C, Carre G et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
10. Duchateau MJ, Velthuis HHW, Boomsma JJ (2003) Sex ratio variation in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Behav Ecol 15:71–82. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg087
11. Dupont YL, Damgaard C, Simonsen V (2011) Quantitative historical change in Bumblebee (Bombus spp.) Assemblages of red clover fields. Plos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025172
12. Fitzpatrick U, Murray TE, Paxton RJ, Breen J, Cotton D, Santorum V, Brown MJF (2007) Rarity and decline in bumblebees—a test of causes and correlates in the Irish fauna. Biol Cons 136:185–194. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.012
13. Fussell M, Corbet SA (1992) The nesting places of some British bumble bees. J Apic Res 31:32–41
14. Goulson D, Peat J, Stout J, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC, Hughes WOH (2002) Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav 64:123–130. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3041
15. Goulson D, Hanley ME, Darvill B, Ellis J, Knight M (2005) Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol Conserv 122:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.017
16. Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008a) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol 53:191–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454
17. Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008b) Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees. Biodivers Conserv 17:3269–3288. doi:10.1007/s10531-008-9428-y
18. Goulson D et al (2010) Effects of land use at a landscape scale on bumblebee nest density and survival. J Appl Ecol 47:1207–1215. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01872.x
19. Greenleaf S, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C (2007) Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589–596. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9
20. Heard MS, Carvell C, Carreck NL, Rothery P, Osborne JL, Bourke AFG (2007) Landscape context not patch size determines bumble-bee density on flower mixtures sown for agri-environment schemes. Biol Lett 3:638–641. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0425
21. Heinrich B (1979) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
22. Holmström G (2007) Humlor—Alla Sveriges arter, så känner du igen dem i naturen och i trädgården. Symposion, Stockholm, Sweden
23. Inoue MN, Yokoyama J (2006) Morphological variation in relation to flower use in bumblebees. Entomol Sci 9:147–159. doi:10.1111/j.1479-8298.2006.00162.x
24. Jha S, Kremen C (2013) Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging. PNAS 110:555–558. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208682110
25. Kleijn D, Raemakers I (2008) A retrospective analysis of pollen host plant use by stable and declining bumble bee species. Ecology 89:1811–1823. doi:10.1890/07-1275.1
26. Kleijn D, Winfree R, Bartomeus I et al (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat Commun. doi:10.1038/ncomms8414
27. Lagerlöf J, Stark J, Svensson B (1992) Margins of agricultural fields as habitats for pollinating insects. AGEE 40:117–124. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(92)90087-R
28. Löken A (1973) Studies on scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Nor J Entomol 20:1–218
29. Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10:710–717. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
30. Mossberg B, Cederberg B (2012) Humlor i Sverige. 40 arter att älska och förundras över. Bonnier fakta, Sweden
31. Osborne JL et al (2008) Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. J Anim Ecol 77:406–415. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.x
32. Peat J, Tucker J, Goulson D (2005) Does intraspecific size variation in bumblebees allow colonies to efficiently exploit different flowers? Ecol Entomol 30:176–181. doi:10.1111/j.0307-6946.2005.00676.x
33. Pelletier L, McNeil JN (2003) The effect of food supplementation on reproductive success in bumblebee field colonies. Oikos 103:688–694. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12592.x
34. Persson AS, Smith HG (2013) Seasonal persistence of bumblebee populations is affected by landscape context. AGEE 165:201–209. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.008
35. Persson AS, Olsson O, Rundlöf M, Smith HG (2010) Land use intensity and landscape complexity-analysis of landscape characteristics in an agricultural region in Southern Sweden. AGEE 136:169–176. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.12.018
36. Prŷs-Jones OE, Corbet SA (1987) Naturalist’s handbooks 6. Bumble bees. Naturalists’ handbooks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Ricotta C, Moretti M (2011) CWM and Rao’s quadratic diversity: a unified framework for functional ecology. Oecologia 167:181–188. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1965-5
38. Roulston TAH, Goodell K (2010) The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annu Rev Entomol 56:293–312. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144802
39. Rundlöf M, Nilsson H, Smith HG (2008) Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumblebees. Biol Conserv 141:417–426. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.011
40. Rundlöf M, Persson AS, Smith HG, Bommarco R (2014) Late-season mass-flowering red clover increases bumble bee queen and male densities. Biol Conserv 172:138–145. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.02.027
41. Sladen FWL (1912) The humle-bee. MacMillan & CO., London
42. Stoate C, Boatman ND, Borralho RJ, Carvalho CR, Snoo GR, Eden P (2001) Ecological impacts of arable intensification in Europe. J Environ Manag 63:337–365. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0473
43. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 6:961–965. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x
44. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2006) Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 149:289–300. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6
45. Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distribution among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921. doi:10.1890/06-0269
46. Williams PH, Osborne J (2009) Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40:367–387. doi:10.1051/apido/2009025
47. Williams PH, Colla S, Xie Z (2009) Bumblebee vulnerability: common correlates of winners and losers across three continents. Conserv Biol 23:931–940. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01176.x
48. Williams NM, Crone EE, Roulston TH, Minckley RL, Packer L, Potts SG (2010) Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances. Biol Conserv 143:2280–2291. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.024
49. Williams NM, Regetz J, Kremen C (2012a) Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees. Ecology 93:1049–1058. doi:10.1890/11-1006.1
50. Williams PH et al (2012b) Unveiling cryptic species of the bumble bee subgenus Bombus s. str. worldwide with COI barcodes (Hymenoptera: Apidae). System Biodiv 10:21–56. doi:10.1080/14772000.2012.664574
51. Winfree R (2010) The conservation and restoration of wild bees. Ann NY Acad Sci 1195:169–197. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05449.x