Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles

The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 316-344

  Mayer, Richard E ^a   Pilegard, Celeste ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947485319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology,20(3), 287-298.
2. Boucheix, J., & Guignard, H. (2005). What animated illustrations conditions can improve technical document comprehension in young students? Format, signaling and control of the presentation. European Journal of Psychology of Education,20, 369-388.
3. Boucheix, J., & Schneider, E. (2009). Static and animated presentations in learning dynamic mechanical systems. Learning and Instruction,19(2), 112-127.
4. Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 53-62.
5. Brunken, R., Seifert, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Measuring cognitive load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory(pp. 181-202). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cheon, J., Crooks, S., & Chung, S. (2013). Does segmenting principle counteract modality principle in instructional animation? British Journal of Educational Technology. Online i rst publication.
7. Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The impact of sequencing and prior knowledge on learning mathematics through spreadsheet applications. Educational Technology Research and Development,53(3), 15-24.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2d ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 428-434.
10. Crooks, S. M., Cheon, J., Inan, F., Ari, F., & Flores, R. (2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior,28, 1063-1071.
11. DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology,100, 223-234.
12. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., & Schüler, A. (2013). How inspecting a picture affects processing of text in multimedia learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology,27, 451-461.
13. Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning and Instruction,16(2), 104-121.
15. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction,15, 313-332.
16. Harskamp, E. G., Mayer, R. E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms? Learning and Instruction,17, 465-477.
17. Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B., & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load, and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21, 713-729.
18. Hassanabadi, H., Robatjazi, E. S., & Savoji, A. P. (2011). Cognitive consequences of segmentation and modality methods in learning from instructional animations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,30, 1481-1487.
19. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
20. Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology,17, 329-343.
21. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology,13, 351-371.
22. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology,92, 126-136.
23. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004a). Timing of information presentation in learning statistics. Instructional Science,32, 233-252.
24. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004b). Information presentation and troubleshooting in electrical circuits. International Journal of Science Education,26, 239-256.
25. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Just-in-time information presentation: Improving learning a troubleshooting skill. Contemporary Educational Psychology,31, 167-185.
26. Kester, L., Lehnen, C., van Gerven, P. W. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Just-in-time, schematic supporting information presentation during cognitive skill acquisition. Computers in Human Behavior,22, 93-112.
27. Khacharem, A., Spanjers, I. A. E., Zoudji, B., Kalyuga, S., & Ripoll, H. (2013). Using segmentation to support the learning from animated soccer scenes: An effect of prior knowledge. Psychology of Sport and Exercise,14, 154-160.
28. Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Edelmann, J. (2011). The inl uence of text modality on learning with static and dynamic visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior,27(1), 29-35.
29. Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology,17, 401-418.
30. Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25(6), 943-951.
31. Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006). Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations. Journal of Educational Psychology,98, 902-913.
32. Lindow, S., Fuchs, H. M., Fürstenberg, A., Kleber, J., Schweppe, J., & Rummer, R. (2011). On the robustness of the modality effect: Attempting to replicate a basic i nding. Zeitschrift für P ä dagogische Psychologie,25(4), 231-243.
33. Lusk, D. L., Evans, A. D., Jeffrey, T. R., Palmer, K. R., Wikstrom, C. S., & Doolittle, P. E. (2009). Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation. British Journal of Educational Technology,40(4), 636-651.
34. Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Cognitive aids for guiding graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology,99, 640-652.
35. Mayer, R. E. (1983). Can you repeat that? Qualitative effects of repetition and advance organizers on learning from science prose. Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 40-49.
36. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2d ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology,93, 390-397.
38. Mayer, R. E., Dow, G., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 806-813.
39. Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,8, 147-154.
40. Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 171-185.
41. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology,90, 312-320.
42. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist,38, 43-52.
43. Mayrath, M. C., Nihalani, P. K., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Varying tutorial modality and interface restriction to maximize transfer in a complex simulation environment. Journal of Educational Psychology,103(2), 257-268.
44. McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes,48, 69-92.
45. Moreno, R. (2007). Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signaling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology,21, 765-781.
46. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999) Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology,91, 358-368.
47. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology,94, 598-610.
48. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction,19, 177-213.
49. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology,87, 319-334.
50. O’Neil, H. F., Mayer, R. E., Herl, H. E., Niemi, C., Olin, K., & Thurman, R. A. (2000). Instructional strategies for virtual aviation training environments. In H. F. O’Neil & D. H. Andrews (Eds.), Aircrew training and assessment(pp. 105-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Owens, P., & Sweller, J. (2008). Cognitive load theory and music instruction. Educational Psychology,28(1), 29-45.
52. Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior,27(1), 5-10.
53. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction,12, 61-86.
54. Reinwein, J. (2012). Does the modality effect exist? And if so, which modality effect? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,41, 1-32.
55. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010a). A closer look at split visual attention in system and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction,20, 100-110.
56. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010b). Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: New insights from investigating students’ viewing behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology,24, 226-237.
57. Schüler, A., Scheiter, K., & Gerjects, P. (2013). Is spoken text always better? Investigating the modality and redundancy effect with longer text presentation. Computers in Human Behavior,29, 1590-1601.
58. Schüler, A, Scheiter, K., Rummer, R., & Gerjets, P. (2012). Explaining the modality effect in multimedia learning: Is it due to a lack of temporal contiguity with written text and pictures? Learning and Instruction,22, 92-102.
59. Singh, A., Marcus, N., & Ayres, P. (2012). The transient information effect: Investigating the impact of segmentation on spoken and written text. Applied Cognitive Psychology,26, 848-853.
60. Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educational Psychology Review,22, 411-423.
61. Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). Segmentation of worked examples: Effects on cognitive load and learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology,26, 352-358.
62. Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., Wouters, P., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012). Explaining the segmentation effect in learning from animations: The role of pausing and temporal cueing. Computers & Education,59(2), 274-280.
63. Spanjers, I. A. E., Wouters, P., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior,27, 46-52.
64. Stiller, K. D., Freitag, A., Zinnbauer, P., & Freitag, C. (2009). How pacing of multimedia instructions can inl uence modality effects: A case of superiority of visual texts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,25(2), 184-203.
65. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
66. Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing. British Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 71-81.
67. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,3, 257-287.
68. Witteman, M. J., & Segers, E. (2010). The modality effect tested in children in a userpaced multimedia environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,26(2), 132-142.
69. Wong, A., Leahy, W., Marcus, N., & Sweller, J. (2012). Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction,22, 449-457.
70. Wong, D. M. (2010). The Wall Street Journal guide to information graphics. New York: Norton.
71. Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2009). Observational learning from animated models: Effects of modality and reflection on transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology,34(1), 1-8.