Women's preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program model: A randomized controlled trial

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1513-1522

  Andraos, Christine ^a   Arthur, Heather M ^b   Oh, Paul ^c   Chessex, Caroline ^c   Brister, Stephanie ^c   Grace, Sherry L ^a,c  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cardiac Care Facility; patient satisfaction; Rehabilitation; women's health

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEART REHABILITATION; HOME CARE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SEX; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLOTHING; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICE; HEART DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ONTARIO; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

AGED; CLOTHING; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; ONTARIO; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERCEPTION; SEX FACTORS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 84947445170     PISSN: 20474873     EISSN: 20474881     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2047487314559275     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mendis P, et al. Global atlast of cardiovascular disease prevention and control. Report, WHO, Geneva 2011. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). World Heal Organ Media Cent.
2. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) Fact Sheet No. 317, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/ (2011, accessed 25 September 2013).
3. World Health Organization. WHO Statistical Information System (WHOSIS), http://www.who.int/cardiovascular-diseases/resources/atlas/en/ (2014, accessed 9 August 2014).
4. American Heart Association. Women and heart disease, http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Advocate/IssuesandCampaigns/QualityCare/Women-and-Heart-Disease-UCM-430484-Article.jsp (2013, accessed 20 September 2013).
5. Piepoli MF, et al. Secondary prevention in the clinical management of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Core components, standards and outcome measures for referral and delivery. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012; 201-218.
6. Perk J, et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 1635-1701.
7. Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Canadian Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: translating knowledge into action. 3rd ed. Winnipeg, 2009.
8. Heran BS, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD001800.
9. Samayoa L, et al. Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: a meta-Analysis. Can J Cardiol 2013.
10. Mosca L, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women-2011 update: a guideline from the american heart association. Circulation 2011; 123: 1243-1262.
11. McCarthy MM, et al. Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in women with cardiovascular disease: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2011; 26: E1-E10.
12. Sanderson BK, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and women: what keeps them away? J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2010; 30: 12-21.
13. Benz-Scott L, et al. Why are women missing from outpatient cardiac. J Women's Heal 2002; 11: 773-791.
14. Rolfe DE, et al. Women's experiences accessing a women-centered cardiac rehabilitation program: a qualitative study. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2010; 25: 332-341.
15. Beckie TM, et al. Physiological and exercise capacity improvements in women completing cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2013; 33: 16-25.
16. Beckie TM, Beckstead JW,. The effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program tailored for women on their perceptions of health: a randomized clinical trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2011; 31: 25-34.
17. Beckie TM, Beckstead JW,. Predicting cardiac rehabilitation attendance in a gender-tailored randomized clinical trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2010; 30: 147-156.
18. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, et al. Gender-specific issues in cardiac rehabilitation: do women with ischaemic heart disease need specially tailored programmes? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 163-171.
19. Zwarenstein M, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008; 337: a2390-a2390.
20. Schwartz D, Lellouch J,. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chron Dis 1967; 20: 637-658.
21. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of disease of the heart and great vessels, 9th edn. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co., 1994.
22. Lucien C,. Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina pectoris. Circulation 1976; 54: 522-523.
23. IBM. SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0, NY, 2012.
24. Saladana J,. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2009.
25. Fernandez RS,. Validation of the revised cardiac rehabilitation preference form in patients with post-percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2007; 27: 390-394.
26. Jones MI, et al. Patients' experience of home and hospital based cardiac rehabilitation: a focus group study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2009; 8: 9-17.
27. Grace SL, et al. Patient preferences for home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2005; 25: 24-29.
28. Madden M, et al. Complexities of patient choice in cardiac rehabilitation: qualitative findings. J Adv Nurs 2011; 67: 540-549.
29. Moore SM,. Women's views of cardiac rehabilitation programs. Jounral Cardiopulm Rehabil 1996; 16: 123-129.
30. Dalal HM, et al. Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms-Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). Int J Cardiol 2007; 119: 202-211.
31. Evans, et al. Listening to patients: choice in cardiac rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 289-294.