Patient preferences for home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation

Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 24-29

  Grace, Sherry L ^a,c   McDonald, Jennifer ^b   Fishman, Doron ^a   Caruso, Veola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEART REHABILITATION; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; LIFESTYLE; LIPID BLOOD LEVEL; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; NUTRITION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SECONDARY PREVENTION;

EID: 14644399836     PISSN: 08839212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008483-200501000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Linden W, Stossel C, Maurice J. Psychosocial interventions for patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:745-752.
2. Maines TY, Lavie CJ, Milani RV, Cassidy MM, Gilliland YE, Murgo JP. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise programs on exercise capacity, coronary risk factors, behavior, and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. South Med J. 1997;90:43-49.
3. Brown A, Taylor R, Noorani H, Stone J, Skidmore B. Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs for Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Clinical and Economic Review. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment; 2003. Technology report No. 34.
4. Daly J, Sindone AP, Thompson DR, Hancock K, Chang E, Davidson P. Barriers to participation in and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: a critical literature review. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002;17:8-17.
5. Grace SL, Evindar A, Abramson BL, Stewart DE. Physician management preferences for cardiac patients: factors affecting referral to cardiac rehabilitation. Can J Cardiol. 2004;20(11): 1101-1107.
6. Grace SL, Abbey S, Shnek Z, Irvine J, France RL, Stewart DE. Cardiac rehabilitation, II: Referral and participation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2002;24:127-134.
7. Grace SL, Evindar A, Kung T, Scholey P, Stewart DE. Automatic referral to cardiac rehabilitation. Med Care. 2004;42:661-669.
8. Johnson JE, Weinert C, Richardson JK. Rural residents' use of cardiac rehabilitation programs. Public Health Nurs. 1998;15:288-296.
9. Froelicher V, Herbert W, Myers J, Ribisl P. How cardiac rehabilitation is being influenced by changes in health-care delivery. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:151-159.
10. Houston-Miller N, Warren D, Myers D. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation and lifestyle modification: the MULTIFIT model. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1996;11:76-87.
11. Kodis J, Smith KM, Arthur HM, Daniels C, Suskin N, McKelvie RS. Changes in exercise capacity and lipids after clinic versus home-based aerobic training in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21:31-36.
12. Ades PA, Pashkow FJ, Fletcher G, Pina IL, Zohman LR, Nestor JR. A controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation in the home setting using electrocardiographic and voice transtelephonic monitoring. Am Heart J. 2000;139:543-548.
13. Barr Taylor C, Houston-Miller N, Ahn D, Haskell W, DeBusk R. The effects of exercise training programs on psychosocial improvement in uncomplicated postmyocardial patients. J Psychosom Res. 1986;30:581-587.
14. DeBusk R, Haskell W, Houston-Miller N, Berra K, Barr Taylor C. Medically directed at-home rehabilitation soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: a new model for patient care. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:251-257.
15. Marchionni N, Fattirolli F, Funagalli S, et al. Improved exercise tolerance and quality of life with cardiac rehabilitation of older patients after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003;107:2201-2206.
16. Carlson JJ, Johnson JA, Franklin BA, VanderLaan RL. Program participation, exercise adherence, cardiovascular outcomes, and program cost of traditional versus modified cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:17-23.
17. Southard B, Southard D, Nuckolls J. Clinical trial of an Internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23:341-348.
18. Moore SM, Kramer FM. Women's and men's preferences for cardiac rehabilitation program features. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:163-168.
19. Filip J, McGillen C, Mosca L. Patient preferences for cardiac rehabilitation and desired program elements. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1999;19:339-343.
20. Warrington D, Cholowski K, Peters D. Effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation for special needs patients. J Adv Nuts. 2003;41:121-129.
21. Blackburn GG, Foody JM, Sprecher DL, Park E, Apperson-Hansen C, Pashkow FJ. Cardiac rehabilitation participation patterns in a large, tertiary care center: evidence for selection bias. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000;20:189-195.
22. McHugh Shuster P, Wright C, Tomich P. Gender differences in the outcomes of participants in home programs compared to those in structured cardiac rehabilitation programs. Rehabil Nurs. 1995;20:93-101.
23. Dalal H, Evans P. Achieving national service framework standards for cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention. BMJ. 2003;326:481-484.
24. American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 2000.
25. Stone JA, Cyr C, Friesen M, Kennedy-Symonds H, Stene R, Smilovitch M. Canadian guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and atherosclerotic heart disease prevention: a summary. Can J Cardiol. 2001;17(suppl B):3B-30B.
26. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
27. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651-654.
28. Tod A, Wadsworth E, Asif S, Gerrish K. Cardiac rehabilitation: the needs of South Asian cardiac patients. Br J Nurs. 2001;10:1028-1033.
29. Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. The Ontario cardiac rehabilitation pilot project: report and recommendations. 2002. Available at: http://www.ccn.on.ca/ rehabpublic/FinalReport_PDF_Sept30_02_ FINALpassword.pdf. Accessed January 3, 2004.
30. Bhopal R. Epidemic of cardiovascular disease in South Asians. BMJ. 2002;324:625-626.
31. Sheth T, Nair C, Nargundkar M, Anand S, Yusuf S. Cardiovascular and cancer mortality among Canadians of European, South Asian and Chinese origin from 1979-1993: an analysis of 1.2 million deaths. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;161:132-138.
32. Tofler GH, Stone PH, Muller JE, et al. Effects of gender and race on prognosis after myocardial infarction: adverse prognosis for women, particularly black women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:473-482.
33. Moore SM. Women's views of cardiac rehabilitation programs. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1996;16:123-129.