Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modeling

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Jäger, Lena A ^a   Engelmann, Felix ^a   Vasishth, Shravan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACT R; Chinese reflexives; computational modeling; content addressable memory; cue based retrieval; eye tracking; interference; ziji

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947265423     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00617     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Anderson J. R. Bothell D. Byrne M. D. Douglass S. Lebiere C. Qin Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol. Rev. 111, 1036–1060. 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.103615482072
2. Anderson J. R. Lebiere C. (1998). Atomic Components of Thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Ariel M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
4. Arnold D. (2007). Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. J. Linguist. 43, 271–309. 10.1017/S0022226707004586
5. Arnold J. E. (2001). The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference continuation. Discourse Process. 31, 137–162. 10.1207/S15326950DP3102_02
6. Badecker W. Straub K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. J. Exp. Psychol. 28, 748–769. 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.74812109766
7. Bates D. Maechler M. Bolker B. Walker S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6. Available online at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
8. Bonferroni C. E. (1936). Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze 8, 3–62.
9. Box G. E. P. Cox D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. 26, 211–234.
10. Brennan S. E. (1995). Centering attention in discourse. Lang. Cogn. Process. 10, 137–167. 7791600
11. Büring D. (2005). Binding Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics; Cambridge University Press.
12. Cai Q. Brysbaert M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE 5:e10729. 10.1371/journal.pone.001072920532192
13. Chafe W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view, in Subject and Topic, ed Li C. N. (New York, NY: Acedemic Press), 25–56.
14. Chen Z. Jäger L. Vasishth S. (2012). How structure-sensitive is the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese, in Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory: Studies of Meaning and Structure (Studies in Generative Grammar), eds Stolterfoht B. Featherston S. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), 43–62.
15. Clackson K. Felser C. Clahsen H. (2011). Children's processing of reflexives and pronouns in English: evidence from eye-movements during listening. J. Mem. Lang. 65, 128–144. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.007
16. Clackson K. Heyer V. (2014). Reflexive anaphor resolution in spoken language comprehension: structural constraints and beyond. Front. Psychol. 5:904. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0090425191290
17. Clifton C. J. Frazier L. Deevy P. (1999). Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension. Riv. Linguist. 11, 11–39. 18720277
18. Clifton C. J. Staub A. Rayner K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences, in Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain, Chapter 15, eds Van Gompel R. P. Fischer M. H. Murray W. S. Hill R. L. (Oxford: Elsevier), 341–372.
19. Cole P. Hermon G. Sung L. (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguist. Inq. 21, 1–22.
20. Cole P. Hermon G. Sung L.-M. (1993). Feature percolation. J. East Asian Linguist. 2, 91–118.
21. Cole P. Sung L.-M. (1994). Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguist. Inq. 25, 355–406.
22. Cole P. Wang C. (1996). Antecedents and blockers of long-distance reflexives: the case of Chinese ziji. Linguist. Inq. 27, 357–390.
23. Cousineau D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorial Quant. Methods Psychol. 1, 42–45.
24. Cowles H. W. Walenski M. Kluender R. (2007). Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: topic, contrastive focus and pronouns. Topoi 26, 3–18. 10.1007/s11245-006-9004-6
25. Cunnings I. Felser C. (2013). The role of working memory in the processing of reflexives. Lang. Cogn. Process. 28, 188–219. 10.1080/01690965.2010.548391
26. Cunnings I. Sturt P. (2014). Coargumenthood and the processing of reflexives. J. Mem. Lang. 75, 117–139. 10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.006
27. Diana R. A. Reder L. M. (2006). The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: word frequency affects processing demands. J. Exp. Psychol. 32, 1805–1815. 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.805
28. Dillon B. (2011). Structured Access in Sentence Comprehension. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
29. Dillon B. Chow W.-Y. Wagers M. Guo T. Liu F. Phillips C. (2014). The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Front. Psychol. 5:1025. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0102525309486
30. Dillon B. Clifton C. Sloggett S. Frazier L. (2015). Not all relative clauses interfere equally in filler-gap processing, in 28th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California), 281.
31. Dillon B. Mishler A. Sloggett S. Phillips C. (2013). Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: experimental and modeling evidence. J. Mem. Lang. 69, 85–103. 10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003
32. Du Bois J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 805–855.
33. Du Bois J. W. (2003). Argument structure: grammar in use, in Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, Vol. 14 of Studies in Discourse and Grammar, eds Du Bois J. W. Kumpf L. E. Ashby W. J. (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), 11–60.
34. Dunn J. O. (1959). Estimation of the medians for dependent variables. Ann. Math. Stat. 30, 192–197. 17304081
35. Dunn J. O. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56, 52–64.
36. Engelmann F. Jäger L. Vasishth S. (2015). Cue confusion and distractor prominence can explain inconsistent interference effects, in 28th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California), 168.
37. Felser C. Sato M. Bertenshaw N. (2009). The on-line application of Binding Principle A in English as a second language. Bilingualism 12, 485–502. 10.1017/S1366728909990228
38. Ferreira F. Ferraro V. Bailey K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 11–15. 10.1111/1467-8721.00158
39. Fukumura K. van Gompel R. P. G. (2011). The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression. Lang. Cogn. Process. 26, 1472–1504. 10.1080/01690965.2010.506444
40. Gao L. Liu Z. Huang Y. (2005). Ziji shi shei? Dui yueshu yuanze de shiyan yanjiu [Who is ziji? An experimental research on Binding Principles]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguist. Sci.] 4, 39–50.
41. Gelman A. Hill J. (2007). Data Analysis using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Gernsbacher M. A. Hargreaves D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention. J. Mem. Lang. 27, 699–717. 25520541
43. Givón T. (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44. Grosz B. J. Weinstein S. Joshi A. K. (1995). Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Comput. Linguist. 21, 203–225.
45. Gundel J. Hedberg N. Zacharski R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274–307.
46. Huang C.-T. J. (2002). Distributivity and reflexivity, in On the Formal Way to Chinese Languages, eds Tang S.-W. Liu C.-S. L. (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications), 21–44.
47. Huang C.-T. J. Huang Y.-H. Teng T.-H. Tiedeman R. (1984). Reflexives in Chinese and the teaching of Chinese, in Proceedings of the First World Conference on Chinese Language (Taipeih: World Chinese Language Association), 205–215.
48. Huang C.-T. J. Liu C.-S. L. (2001). Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface, in Long-Distance Reflexives, Vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics, eds Cole P. Hermon G. Huang C.-T. J. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 141–195.
49. Huang C.-T. J. Tang C.-C. J. (1989). The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese, in Proceedings of NELS 19 (Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications), 191–206.
50. Huang C.-T. J. Tang C.-C. J. (1991). The local nature of the long-distance reflexive in Chinese, in Long-Distance Anaphora, eds Koster J. Reuland E. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 263–282.
51. Huang Y.-H. (1984). Reflexives in Chinese. Stud. Eng. Lit. Linguist. 10, 163–188.
52. Ioannidis J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2:e124. 10.1371/journal.pmed.002012416060722
53. Kang B.-M. (1988). Unbounded reflexives. Linguist. Philos. 11, 415–456. 18774214
54. Keenan E. L. Comrie B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguist. Inq. 8, 63–99.
55. King J. Andrews C. Wagers M. (2012). Do reflexives always find a grammatical antecedent for themselves?, in 25th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (New York, NY: The CUNY Graduate Center), 67.
56. Kush D. Phillips C. (2014). Local anaphor licensing in an SOV language: implications for retrieval strategies. Front. Psychol. 5:1252. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.0125225414680
57. Lewis R. L. Vasishth S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cogn. Sci. 29, 375–419. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_2521702779
58. Li N. (1991). Perspective-Taking in Mandarin Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
59. Li X. Zhou X. (2010). Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension. Brain Res. 1331, 96–104. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.05020307507
60. Liu L. (2010). A pragmatic account of anaphora: the cases of the bare reflexive in Chinese. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 1, 796–806. 10.4304/jltr.1.6.796-806
61. Liu Z. (2009). The cognitive process of Chinese reflexive processing. J. Chin. Linguist. 37, 1–27.
62. Logačev P. Vasishth S. (2015). A multiple-channel model of task-dependent ambiguity resolution in sentence comprehension. Cogn. Sci. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/cogs.1222825823920
63. Manzini M. R. Wexler K. (1987). Parameters, binding theory, and learnability. Linguist. Inq. 18, 413–444. 8783140
64. Martin A. E. McElree B. (2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. J. Mem. Lang. 58, 879–906. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.01019686017
65. McElree B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 29, 111–123. 10.1023/A:100518470969510709178
66. McElree B. (2003). Accessing recent events. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 46, 155–200. 10.1016/S0079-7421(06)46005-9
67. McElree B. Dosher B. (1989). Serial position and set size in short-term memory: the time course of recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. 118, 346–373.
68. McElree B. Foraker S. Dyer L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 48, 67–91. 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00515-621702779
69. Morey R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial Quant. Methods Psychol. 4, 61–64.
70. Nicol J. Swinney D. (1989). The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 18, 5–19. 2647962
71. Pan H. (1995). Locality, Self-Ascription, Discourse Prominence, and Mandarin Reflexives. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
72. Pan H. (1997). Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
73. Pan H. (2000). Why the blocking effect?, in Long-Distance Reflexives, Vol. 33 of Syntax and Semantics, eds Cole P. Hermon G. Huang C.-T. J. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 279–316.
74. Parker D. Phillips C. (2014). Selective priority for structure in memory retrieval, in 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University), 100.
75. Phillips C. Wagers M. W. Lau E. F. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension, in Experiments at the Interfaces, Vol. 37 of Syntax and Semantics, ed Runner J. (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 147–180.
76. Pica P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivation circle, in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, eds McDonough J. Plunkett B. (Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications), 483–499.
77. Pollard C. Xue P. (1998). Chinese reflexive ziji: syntactic reflexives vs. nonsyntactic reflexives. J. East Asian Linguist. 7, 287–318.
78. Potts C. (2005). The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Reuland E. (2011). Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
80. Simmons J. P. Nelson L. D. Simonsohn U. (2011). False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1359–1366. 10.1177/095679761141763222006061
81. Sternberg S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science 153, 652–654. 5939936
82. Sternberg S. (1969). Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am. Sci. 57, 421–457. 5360276
83. Sturt P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. J. Mem. Lang. 48, 542–562. 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
84. Swets B. Desmet T. Clifton C. Ferreira F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: evidence from self-paced reading. Mem. Cogn. 36, 201–216. 10.3758/MC.36.1.20118323075
85. Tang C.-C. J. (1989). Chinese reflexives. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 7, 93–121.
86. Traxler M. J. (2007). Working memory contributions to relative clause attachment processing: a hierarchical linear modeling analysis. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1107–1121. 10.3758/BF0319348217910193
87. Van Dyke J. (2007). Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. J. Exp. Psychol. 33, 407–430. 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.40717352621
88. Van Dyke J. McElree B. (2006). Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 55, 157–166. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.00718209744
89. Van Dyke J. McElree B. (2011). Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. J. Mem. Lang. 65, 247–263. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.00221927535
90. Van Gompel R. P. Majid A. (2004). Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns. Cognition 90, 255–264. 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00161-614667697
91. von der Malsburg T. Vasishth S. (2012). Scanpaths reveal syntactic underspecification and reanalysis strategies. Lang. Cogn. Process. 28, 1–34. 10.1080/01690965.2012.728232
92. Wagers M. W. Lau E. F. Phillips C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: representations and processes. J. Mem. Lang. 61, 206–237. 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.00225914652
93. Xiang M. Dillon B. Phillips C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain Lang. 108, 40–55. 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.00219007980
94. Xue P. Pollard C. Sag I. (1994). A new perspective on Chinese ziji, in Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications), 432–447.
95. Yang D.-W. (1983). The extended binding theory of anaphora. Lang. Res. 19, 169–192.
96. Yu W. X. (1992). Challenging Chinese reflexive data. Linguist. Rev. 9, 285–294.
97. Yu X.-F. W. (1996). A Study of Chinese Reflexives. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, London, UK.