How structure-sensitive is the parser? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese

Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory: Studies in Meaning and Structure

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 43-62

  Chen, Zhong ^a   Jäger, Lena ^a   Vasishth, Shravan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906331081     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Badecker, W. & K. Straub 2002 The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28: 748-769
2. Bates, D. & D. Sarkar 2007 lme4: Linear mixed e ffects model using S4 classes
3. Chomsky, N. 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris
4. Cohen, J. 1988 Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
5. Cole, P. & L.-M. Sung 1994 Head movement and long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 355-406
6. Dillon, B., W.Y. Chow, M. Wagers, T. Guo, F. Liu & C. Phillips submitted The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese
7. Gelman, A. & J. Hill 2007 Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Hoenig, J.M. & D.M. Heisey 2001 The abuse of power. The American Statistician 55 (1): 19-24
9. Hofmeister, P. & I.A. Sag 2010 Cognitive Constraints on Syntactic Islands. Language 86: 366-415
10. Huang, C.-T.J. 1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531-574
11. Huang, C.-T. J. & C.-S. L. Liu 2001 Logophoricity, attitudes, and ziji at the interface. In: P. Cole, G. Hermon, and C.-T. J. Huang (eds.), Long-Distance Reflexives. New York: Academic Press, 141-195
12. Just, M.A., P.A. Carpenter & J.D. Woolley 1982 Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111 (2): 222-238
13. Kluender, R. 1998 On the distinction between weak and strong islands: A processing perspective. Syntax and Semantics 29: 241-280
14. Kluender, R. & M. Kutas 1993b. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 573-633
15. Li, X. & X. Zhou 2010 Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension. Brain Research 1331: 96-104
16. Mitchell, D. C. 1984 An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods of investigating immediate processes in reading. In: D. E. Kieras and M.A. Just (eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
17. Pan, H. 1997 Constraints on reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. New York: Garland Publishing Inc
18. Patil, U., S. Vasishth & R.L. Lewis 2011 Early retrieval inteference in syntax-guided antecedent-search? Talk presented at the 24th CUNY Sentence Processing Conference, Stanford, CA
19. Phillips, C., M. Wagers & E. Lau 2011 Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces, Syntax and Semantics 37, 153-186. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications
20. Sag, I., P. Hofmeister & N. Snider 2007 Processing complexity in subjacency violations: The complex noun phrase constraint. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 43 (1): 215-229
21. Sturt, P. 2003 The time course of the application of binding constraints. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 542-562
22. Van Dyke, J. A. 2007 Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 (2): 407-430
23. Xiang, M., B. Dillon & C. Phillips 2009 Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain and Language 108 (1): 40-55