Dynamic membrane formation in anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactors: Role of extracellular polymeric substances

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Yu, Hongguang ^a   Wang, Zhiwei ^a   Wu, Zhichao ^a   Zhu, Chaowei ^b  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHINESE RESEARCH ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE; POLYMER; POLYSACCHARIDE; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIC DYNAMIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; BIOREACTOR; CAKE FILTRATION MODEL; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; DYNAMIC MEMBRANE FORMATION; EXTRACTION; FILTRATION; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; INTERACTION ENERGY ANALYSIS; MEMBRANE BIOLOGY; MEMBRANE FORMATION; MODEL; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POROSITY; SHORT TERM FILTRATION TEST; SIMULATION; SLUDGE; TRANS MEMBRANE PRESSURE; ZETA POTENTIAL; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; SEWAGE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOREACTORS; FILTRATION; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; POLYMERS; SEWAGE;

EID: 84947250188     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139703     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. McCarty PL. The development of anaerobic treatment and its future. Water Sci Technol. 2001; 44 (8):149-56. WOS:000172510100020.
2. Ersahin ME, Ozgun H, Dereli RK, Ozturk I, Roest K, van Lier JB. A review on dynamic membrane filtration: Materials, applications and future perspectives. Bioresource Technol. 2012; 122:196-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.086.
3. Kuberkar VT, Davis RH. Modeling of fouling reduction by secondary membranes. J Membrane Sci. 2000; 168(1-2):243-58. doi: 10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00324-5. WOS:000085998800024.
4. Zhang XY, Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Lu FH, Tong J, Zang LL. Formation of dynamic membrane in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2010; 165(1):175-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.09.013. WOS:000285278900022.
5. Yu HG, Wang QY, Wang ZW, Sahinkaya E, Li YL, Ma JX, et al. Start-Up of an Anaerobic Dynamic Membrane Digester for Waste Activated Sludge Digestion: Temporal Variations in Microbial Communities. Plos One. 2014; 9(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093710. WOS:000334103000109.
6. Xie Z, Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhu C, Wu Z. An anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for landfill leachate treatment: Performance and microbial community identification. Bioresource Technol. 2014; 161(0):29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.014.
7. Fan B, Huang X. Characteristics of a self-forming dynamic membrane coupled with a bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(23):5245-51. doi: 10.1021/Es025789n. WOS:000179685000045.
8. Chu L, Li S. Filtration capability and operational characteristics of dynamic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol. 2006; 51(2):173-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. seppur.2006.01.009.
9. Kiso Y, Jung Y-J, Park M-S, Wang W, Shimase M, Yamada T, et al. Coupling of sequencing batch reactor and mesh filtration: Operational parameters and wastewater treatment performance. Water Res. 2005; 39(20):4887-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.025.
10. Chu H, Cao D, Jin W, Dong B. Characteristics of bio-diatomite dynamic membrane process for municipal wastewater treatment. J Membrane Sci. 2008; 325(1):271-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci. 2008.07.040.
11. Yu H, Wang Z, Wang Q, Wu Z, Ma J. Disintegration and acidification of MBR sludge under alkaline conditions. Chem Eng J. 2013; 231:206-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.012.
12. Liu XM, Sheng GP, Luo HW, Zhang F, Yuan SJ, Xu J, et al. Contribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) to the Sludge Aggregation. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(11):4355-60. doi: 10.1021/Es9016766. WOS:000278003500052.
13. Nagaoka H, Ueda S, Miya A. Influence of bacterial extracellular polymers on the membrane separation activated sludge process. Water Sci Technol. 1996; 34(9):165-72. doi: 10.1016/s0273-1223(96) 00800-1. WOS:A1996VY66100022.
14. Wang ZW, Wu ZC, Tang SJ. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2009; 43(9):2504-12. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.026. ISI:000266468500017.
15. Menniti A, Kang S, Elimelech M, Morgenroth E. Influence of shear on the production of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 2009; 43(17):4305-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.052. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.052
16. Geng Z, Hall ER. A comparative study of fouling-related properties of sludge from conventional and membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes. Water Res. 2007; 41(19):4329-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.007.
17. Zhang X, Wang Z, Wu Z, Wei T, Lu F, Tong J, et al. Membrane fouling in an anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for municipal wastewater treatment: Characteristics of membrane foulants and bulk sludge. Process Biochem. 2011; 46(8):1538-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2011.04.002.
18. Liang S, Qu L, Meng F, Han X, Zhang J. Effect of sludge properties on the filtration characteristics of self-forming dynamic membranes (SFDMs) in aerobic bioreactors: Formation time, filtration resistance, and fouling propensity. J Membrane Sci. 2013; 436(0):186-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci. 2013.02.021.
19. Wang ZW, Wu ZC. A Review of Membrane Fouling in MBRs: Characteristics and Role of Sludge Cake Formed on Membrane Surfaces. Separation Science and Technology. 2009; 44(15):3571-96. doi: 10.1080/01496390903182578. WOS:000274347700005.
20. Li WW, Sheng GP, Wang YK, Liu XW, Xu J, Yu HQ. Filtration behaviors and biocake formation mechanism of mesh filters used in membrane bioreactors. Sep Purif Technol. 2011; 81(3):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.026. WOS:000296003200026.
21. APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed. Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation; 2012.
22. Gaudy AF. Colorimetric determination of protein and carbohydrate. Industrial Water Wastes. 1962; 7:17-22.
23. Frolund B, Griebe T, Nielsen PH. Enzymatic-Activity in the Activated-Sludge Floc Matrix. Appl Microbiol Biot. 1995; 43(4):755-61. ISI:A1995RT23200028.
24. Hermia J. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws-Application to power law non-Newtonian fluids. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers. 1982; 60:183-7.
25. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook. USA: Technomic Publishing Co.; 1996.
26. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2000.
27. Wang J, Guan J, Santiwong SR, Waite TD. Characterization of floc size and structure under different monomer and polymer coagulants on microfiltration membrane fouling. J Membrane Sci. 2008; 321 (2):132-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.008.
28. Mikkelsen LH, Keiding K. Physico-chemical characteristics of full scale sewage sludges with implications to dewatering. Water Res. 2002; 36(10):2451-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01) 00477-8.
29. Liu XM, Sheng GP, Yu HQ. DLVO approach to the flocculability of a photosynthetic H-2-producing bacterium, Rhodopseudomonas acidophila. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(13):4620-5. doi: 10.1021/es070107n. WOS:000247782500030.
30. Chen MY, Lee DJ, Tay JH, Show KY. Staining of extracellular polymeric substances and cells in bioaggregates. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2007; 75(2):467-74. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0816-5. WOS:000246842500025.
31. Hwang K-J, Liao C-Y, Tung K-L. Analysis of particle fouling during microfiltration by use of blocking models. J Membrane Sci. 2007; 287(2):287-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.004.
32. Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu Z, Ma J, Jiang Z. Insights into membrane fouling of submerged membrane bioreactors by characterizing different fouling layers formed on membrane surfaces. Chem Eng J. 2012; 179:169-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.074.
33. Yu GH, He PJ, Shao LM. Breakage and Regrowth of Sludge Flocs by Removal and Readdition of Extracellular Polymeric Substances Fractions. Environmental Engineering Science. 2009; 26(10):1533-40. doi: 10.1089/ees.2009.0001. WOS:000270822200009.
34. Lee SA, Fane AG, Waite TD. Impact of Natural Organic Matter on Floc Size and Structure Effects in Membrane Filtration. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39(17):6477-86. doi: 10.1021/es050148o
35. Redman JA, Walker SL, Elimelech M. Bacterial adhesion and transport in porous media: Role of the secondary energy minimum. Environ Sci Technol. 2004; 38(6):1777-85. WOS:000220193900028.
36. Wingender J, Neu TR, Flemming HC. Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Characterization, Structures and Function. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1999.
37. Laspidou CS, Rittmann BE. A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002; 36(11):2711-20. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354 (01)00413-4
38. Sheng GP, Yu HQ. Formation of extracellular polymeric substances from acidogenic sludge in H2-producing process. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2007; 74(1):208-14. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0634-9
39. Meng F, Chae S-R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H-S, Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 2009; 43(6):1489-512. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044